From: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, rookxu <brookxu.cn@gmail.com>,
Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/8] ext4: Refactor code in ext4_mb_normalize_request() and ext4_mb_use_preallocated()
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 13:32:11 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230116080216.249195-4-ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230116080216.249195-1-ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Change some variable names to be more consistent and
refactor some of the code to make it easier to read.
There are no functional changes in this patch
Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index a5f2803aff93..f4e699bce99f 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -3999,7 +3999,8 @@ ext4_mb_normalize_request(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
loff_t orig_size __maybe_unused;
ext4_lblk_t start;
struct ext4_inode_info *ei = EXT4_I(ac->ac_inode);
- struct ext4_prealloc_space *pa;
+ struct ext4_prealloc_space *tmp_pa;
+ ext4_lblk_t tmp_pa_start, tmp_pa_end;
/* do normalize only data requests, metadata requests
do not need preallocation */
@@ -4102,56 +4103,53 @@ ext4_mb_normalize_request(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
/* check we don't cross already preallocated blocks */
rcu_read_lock();
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(pa, &ei->i_prealloc_list, pa_inode_list) {
- ext4_lblk_t pa_end;
-
- if (pa->pa_deleted)
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(tmp_pa, &ei->i_prealloc_list, pa_inode_list) {
+ if (tmp_pa->pa_deleted)
continue;
- spin_lock(&pa->pa_lock);
- if (pa->pa_deleted) {
- spin_unlock(&pa->pa_lock);
+ spin_lock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
+ if (tmp_pa->pa_deleted) {
+ spin_unlock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
continue;
}
- pa_end = pa->pa_lstart + EXT4_C2B(EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb),
- pa->pa_len);
+ tmp_pa_start = tmp_pa->pa_lstart;
+ tmp_pa_end = tmp_pa->pa_lstart + EXT4_C2B(sbi, tmp_pa->pa_len);
/* PA must not overlap original request */
- BUG_ON(!(ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical >= pa_end ||
- ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical < pa->pa_lstart));
+ BUG_ON(!(ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical >= tmp_pa_end ||
+ ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical < tmp_pa_start));
/* skip PAs this normalized request doesn't overlap with */
- if (pa->pa_lstart >= end || pa_end <= start) {
- spin_unlock(&pa->pa_lock);
+ if (tmp_pa_start >= end || tmp_pa_end <= start) {
+ spin_unlock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
continue;
}
- BUG_ON(pa->pa_lstart <= start && pa_end >= end);
+ BUG_ON(tmp_pa_start <= start && tmp_pa_end >= end);
/* adjust start or end to be adjacent to this pa */
- if (pa_end <= ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical) {
- BUG_ON(pa_end < start);
- start = pa_end;
- } else if (pa->pa_lstart > ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical) {
- BUG_ON(pa->pa_lstart > end);
- end = pa->pa_lstart;
+ if (tmp_pa_end <= ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical) {
+ BUG_ON(tmp_pa_end < start);
+ start = tmp_pa_end;
+ } else if (tmp_pa_start > ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical) {
+ BUG_ON(tmp_pa_start > end);
+ end = tmp_pa_start;
}
- spin_unlock(&pa->pa_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
}
rcu_read_unlock();
size = end - start;
/* XXX: extra loop to check we really don't overlap preallocations */
rcu_read_lock();
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(pa, &ei->i_prealloc_list, pa_inode_list) {
- ext4_lblk_t pa_end;
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(tmp_pa, &ei->i_prealloc_list, pa_inode_list) {
+ spin_lock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
+ if (tmp_pa->pa_deleted == 0) {
+ tmp_pa_start = tmp_pa->pa_lstart;
+ tmp_pa_end = tmp_pa->pa_lstart + EXT4_C2B(sbi, tmp_pa->pa_len);
- spin_lock(&pa->pa_lock);
- if (pa->pa_deleted == 0) {
- pa_end = pa->pa_lstart + EXT4_C2B(EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb),
- pa->pa_len);
- BUG_ON(!(start >= pa_end || end <= pa->pa_lstart));
+ BUG_ON(!(start >= tmp_pa_end || end <= tmp_pa_start));
}
- spin_unlock(&pa->pa_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
}
rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -4361,7 +4359,8 @@ ext4_mb_use_preallocated(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
int order, i;
struct ext4_inode_info *ei = EXT4_I(ac->ac_inode);
struct ext4_locality_group *lg;
- struct ext4_prealloc_space *pa, *cpa = NULL;
+ struct ext4_prealloc_space *tmp_pa, *cpa = NULL;
+ ext4_lblk_t tmp_pa_start, tmp_pa_end;
ext4_fsblk_t goal_block;
/* only data can be preallocated */
@@ -4370,18 +4369,20 @@ ext4_mb_use_preallocated(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
/* first, try per-file preallocation */
rcu_read_lock();
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(pa, &ei->i_prealloc_list, pa_inode_list) {
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(tmp_pa, &ei->i_prealloc_list, pa_inode_list) {
/* all fields in this condition don't change,
* so we can skip locking for them */
- if (ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical < pa->pa_lstart ||
- ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical >= (pa->pa_lstart +
- EXT4_C2B(sbi, pa->pa_len)))
+ tmp_pa_start = tmp_pa->pa_lstart;
+ tmp_pa_end = tmp_pa->pa_lstart + EXT4_C2B(sbi, tmp_pa->pa_len);
+
+ if (ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical < tmp_pa_start ||
+ ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical >= tmp_pa_end)
continue;
/* non-extent files can't have physical blocks past 2^32 */
if (!(ext4_test_inode_flag(ac->ac_inode, EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS)) &&
- (pa->pa_pstart + EXT4_C2B(sbi, pa->pa_len) >
+ (tmp_pa->pa_pstart + EXT4_C2B(sbi, tmp_pa->pa_len) >
EXT4_MAX_BLOCK_FILE_PHYS)) {
/*
* Since PAs don't overlap, we won't find any
@@ -4391,16 +4392,16 @@ ext4_mb_use_preallocated(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
}
/* found preallocated blocks, use them */
- spin_lock(&pa->pa_lock);
- if (pa->pa_deleted == 0 && pa->pa_free) {
- atomic_inc(&pa->pa_count);
- ext4_mb_use_inode_pa(ac, pa);
- spin_unlock(&pa->pa_lock);
+ spin_lock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
+ if (tmp_pa->pa_deleted == 0 && tmp_pa->pa_free) {
+ atomic_inc(&tmp_pa->pa_count);
+ ext4_mb_use_inode_pa(ac, tmp_pa);
+ spin_unlock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
ac->ac_criteria = 10;
rcu_read_unlock();
return true;
}
- spin_unlock(&pa->pa_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
}
rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -4424,16 +4425,16 @@ ext4_mb_use_preallocated(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
*/
for (i = order; i < PREALLOC_TB_SIZE; i++) {
rcu_read_lock();
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(pa, &lg->lg_prealloc_list[i],
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(tmp_pa, &lg->lg_prealloc_list[i],
pa_inode_list) {
- spin_lock(&pa->pa_lock);
- if (pa->pa_deleted == 0 &&
- pa->pa_free >= ac->ac_o_ex.fe_len) {
+ spin_lock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
+ if (tmp_pa->pa_deleted == 0 &&
+ tmp_pa->pa_free >= ac->ac_o_ex.fe_len) {
cpa = ext4_mb_check_group_pa(goal_block,
- pa, cpa);
+ tmp_pa, cpa);
}
- spin_unlock(&pa->pa_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
}
rcu_read_unlock();
}
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-16 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-16 8:02 [PATCH v3 0/8] ext4: Convert inode preallocation list to an rbtree Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-01-16 8:02 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] ext4: Stop searching if PA doesn't satisfy non-extent file Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-01-16 8:02 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] ext4: Refactor code related to freeing PAs Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-01-16 8:02 ` Ojaswin Mujoo [this message]
2023-01-16 8:02 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] ext4: Move overlap assert logic into a separate function Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-01-16 8:02 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] ext4: Abstract out overlap fix/check logic in ext4_mb_normalize_request() Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-01-16 8:02 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] ext4: Convert pa->pa_inode_list and pa->pa_obj_lock into a union Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-01-16 8:02 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] ext4: Use rbtrees to manage PAs instead of inode i_prealloc_list Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-01-16 12:23 ` Jan Kara
2023-01-17 10:30 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-01-17 11:03 ` Jan Kara
2023-01-19 6:27 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-01-27 14:43 ` Jan Kara
2023-02-03 8:36 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-02-08 11:25 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-02-09 10:54 ` Jan Kara
2023-02-09 17:54 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-02-10 14:37 ` Jan Kara
2023-02-13 17:58 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-02-14 8:50 ` Jan Kara
2023-02-16 17:07 ` Andreas Dilger
2023-03-17 12:40 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-01-16 8:02 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] ext4: Remove the logic to trim inode PAs Ojaswin Mujoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230116080216.249195-4-ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--to=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=brookxu.cn@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).