linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	Ted Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Locking issue with directory renames
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 19:41:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230118184141.pppaeg7wcj3ierae@quack3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y8gejpDqxV6Uo/xY@ZenIV>

On Wed 18-01-23 16:30:06, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 10:10:36AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Yes, we can lock the source inode in ->rename() if we need it. The snag is
> > that if 'target' exists, it is already locked so when locking 'source' we
> > are possibly not following the VFS lock ordering of i_rwsem by inode
> > address (I don't think it can cause any real dealock but still it looks
> > suspicious). Also we'll have to lock with I_MUTEX_NONDIR2 lockdep class to
> > make lockdep happy but that's just a minor annoyance. Finally, we'll have
> > to check for RENAME_EXCHANGE because in that case, both source and target
> > will be already locked. Thus if we do the additional locking in the
> > filesystem, we will leak quite some details about rename locking into the
> > filesystem which seems undesirable to me.
> 
> Rules for inode locks are simple:
> 	* directories before non-directories
> 	* ancestors before descendents
> 	* for non-directories the ordering is by in-core inode address
> 
> So the instances that need that extra lock would do that when source is
> a directory and non RENAME_EXCHANGE is given.  Having the target already
> locked is irrelevant - if it exists, it's already checked to be a directory
> as well, and had it been a descendent of source, we would have already
> found that and failed with -ELOOP.
> 
> If A and B are both directories, there's no ordering between them unless
> one is an ancestor of another - such can be locked in any order.
> However, one of the following must be true:
> 	* C is locked and both A and B had been observed to be children of C
> after the lock on C had been acquired, or
> 	* ->s_vfs_rename_mutex is held for the filesystem containing both
> A and B.
> 
> Note that ->s_vfs_rename_mutex is there to stabilize the tree topology and
> make "is A an ancestor of B?" possible to check for more than "A is locked,
> B is a child of A, so A will remain its ancestor until unlocked"...

OK, fair enough. I'll fix things inside UDF and ext4.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-18 18:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-17 12:37 Locking issue with directory renames Jan Kara
2023-01-17 16:57 ` Al Viro
2023-01-18  9:10   ` Jan Kara
2023-01-18 16:30     ` Al Viro
2023-01-18 18:41       ` Jan Kara [this message]
2023-01-17 21:44 ` Dave Chinner
2023-01-18  8:56   ` Jan Kara
2023-02-24  0:19   ` Kent Overstreet
2023-02-25  3:46   ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-02-28  1:58     ` Dave Chinner
2023-03-01 12:36       ` Jan Kara
2023-03-02  0:30         ` Dave Chinner
2023-03-02  9:21           ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230118184141.pppaeg7wcj3ierae@quack3 \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).