From: Imran Khan <imran.f.khan@oracle.com>
To: tj@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
joe.jin@oracle.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] kernfs: Introduce separate rwsem to protect inode
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 15:32:00 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230302043203.1695051-1-imran.f.khan@oracle.com> (raw)
This change set is consolidating the changes discussed and/or mentioned
in [1] and [2]. I have not received any feedback about any of the
patches included in this change set, so I am rebasing them on current
linux-next tip and bringing them all in one place.
As mentioned in [1], since changing per-fs kernfs_rwsem into a hashed
rwsem is not working for all scenarios, PATCH-1 here tries to address
the same issue with the help of another newly introduced per-fs rwsem.
PATCH-2 and PATCH-3 are basically resend of PATCH-1 and PATCH-2
respectively in [2].
It would be really helpful if I could get some feedback about this
changeset so that we can reduce the kernfs_rwsem contention and make
sysfs access more scalable for large-scale systems.
The patches in this change set are as follows:
PATCH-1: kernfs: Introduce separate rwsem to protect inode attributes.
PATCH-2: kernfs: Use a per-fs rwsem to protect per-fs list of
kernfs_super_info.
PATCH-3: kernfs: change kernfs_rename_lock into a read-write lock.
Imran Khan (3):
kernfs: Introduce separate rwsem to protect inode attributes.
Use a per-fs rwsem to protect per-fs list of kernfs_super_info.
kernfs: change kernfs_rename_lock into a read-write lock.
fs/kernfs/dir.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
fs/kernfs/file.c | 2 ++
fs/kernfs/inode.c | 16 ++++++++--------
fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h | 2 ++
fs/kernfs/mount.c | 8 ++++----
5 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
base-commit: 7f7a8831520f12a3cf894b0627641fad33971221
[1]:https://lore.kernel.org/all/74969b22-e0b6-30bd-a1f0-132f4b8485cf@oracle.com/
[2]:https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220810111017.2267160-1-imran.f.khan@oracle.com/
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-03-02 4:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-02 4:32 Imran Khan [this message]
2023-03-02 4:32 ` [PATCH 1/3] kernfs: Introduce separate rwsem to protect inode attributes Imran Khan
2023-03-02 16:14 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-03-02 20:32 ` Imran Khan
2023-03-02 4:32 ` [PATCH 2/3] kernfs: Use a per-fs rwsem to protect per-fs list of kernfs_super_info Imran Khan
2023-03-02 16:08 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-03-02 21:28 ` Imran Khan
2023-03-02 4:32 ` [PATCH 3/3] kernfs: change kernfs_rename_lock into a read-write lock Imran Khan
2023-03-02 18:49 ` Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230302043203.1695051-1-imran.f.khan@oracle.com \
--to=imran.f.khan@oracle.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=joe.jin@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).