From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 01/11] ext4: mballoc: Remove useless setting of ac_criteria
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 12:36:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230309113643.tlyyo3ssv7braw7a@quack3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <08aadf4fd475d87020c60792d81276a28d7176c1.1674822311.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
On Fri 27-01-23 18:07:28, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> There will be changes coming in future patches which will introduce a new
> criteria for block allocation. This removes the useless setting of ac_criteria.
> AFAIU, this might be only used to differentiate between whether a preallocated
> blocks was allocated or was regular allocator called for allocating blocks.
> Hence this also adds the debug prints to identify what type of block allocation
> was done in ext4_mb_show_ac().
>
> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Looks good. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> index 5b2ae37a8b80..572e79a698d4 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> @@ -4391,7 +4391,6 @@ ext4_mb_use_preallocated(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
> atomic_inc(&pa->pa_count);
> ext4_mb_use_inode_pa(ac, pa);
> spin_unlock(&pa->pa_lock);
> - ac->ac_criteria = 10;
> rcu_read_unlock();
> return true;
> }
> @@ -4434,7 +4433,6 @@ ext4_mb_use_preallocated(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
> }
> if (cpa) {
> ext4_mb_use_group_pa(ac, cpa);
> - ac->ac_criteria = 20;
> return true;
> }
> return false;
> @@ -5131,6 +5129,10 @@ static void ext4_mb_show_ac(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
> (unsigned long)ac->ac_b_ex.fe_logical,
> (int)ac->ac_criteria);
> mb_debug(sb, "%u found", ac->ac_found);
> + mb_debug(sb, "used pa: %s, ", ac->ac_pa ? "yes" : "no");
> + if (ac->ac_pa)
> + mb_debug(sb, "pa_type %s\n", ac->ac_pa->pa_type == MB_GROUP_PA ?
> + "group pa" : "inode pa");
> ext4_mb_show_pa(sb);
> }
> #else
> --
> 2.31.1
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-09 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-27 12:37 [RFC 00/11] multiblock allocator improvements Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-01-27 12:37 ` [RFC 01/11] ext4: mballoc: Remove useless setting of ac_criteria Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-09 11:36 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2023-01-27 12:37 ` [RFC 02/11] ext4: Remove unused extern variables declaration Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-09 11:37 ` Jan Kara
2023-01-27 12:37 ` [RFC 03/11] ext4: mballoc: Fix getting the right group desc in ext4_mb_prefetch_fini Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-09 11:42 ` Jan Kara
2023-01-27 12:37 ` [RFC 04/11] ext4: Convert mballoc cr (criteria) to enum Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-09 12:11 ` Jan Kara
2023-03-17 10:26 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-23 10:55 ` Jan Kara
2023-03-25 14:42 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-04-20 6:32 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-04-20 14:58 ` Jan Kara
2023-01-27 12:37 ` [RFC 05/11] ext4: Add per CR extent scanned counter Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-09 12:14 ` Jan Kara
2023-01-27 12:37 ` [RFC 06/11] ext4: Add counter to track successful allocation of goal length Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-09 12:17 ` Jan Kara
2023-01-27 12:37 ` [RFC 07/11] ext4: Avoid scanning smaller extents in BG during CR1 Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-09 12:20 ` Jan Kara
2023-01-27 12:37 ` [RFC 08/11] ext4: Don't skip prefetching BLOCK_UNINIT groups Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-09 14:14 ` Jan Kara
2023-03-17 10:55 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-23 10:57 ` Jan Kara
2023-03-25 14:43 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-26 3:54 ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-01-27 12:37 ` [RFC 09/11] ext4: Ensure ext4_mb_prefetch_fini() is called for all prefetched BGs Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-09 14:23 ` Jan Kara
2023-01-27 12:37 ` [RFC 10/11] ext4: Abstract out logic to search average fragment list Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-09 14:25 ` Jan Kara
2023-01-27 12:37 ` [RFC 11/11] ext4: Add allocation criteria 1.5 (CR1_5) Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-09 15:06 ` Jan Kara
2023-03-17 11:37 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-23 11:05 ` Jan Kara
2023-03-25 14:46 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230309113643.tlyyo3ssv7braw7a@quack3 \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).