linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	yebin10@huawei.com
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] pcpcntr: remove percpu_counter_sum_all()
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 19:49:38 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230315084938.2544737-5-david@fromorbit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230315084938.2544737-1-david@fromorbit.com>

From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

percpu_counter_sum_all() is now redundant as the race condition it
was invented to handle is now dealt with by percpu_counter_sum()
directly and all users of percpu_counter_sum_all() have been
removed.

Remove it.

This effectively reverts the changes made in f689054aace2
("percpu_counter: add percpu_counter_sum_all interface") except for
the cpumask iteration that fixes percpu_counter_sum() made earlier
in this series.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/percpu_counter.h |  6 -----
 lib/percpu_counter.c           | 40 ++++++++++------------------------
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/percpu_counter.h b/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
index 521a733e21a9..75b73c83bc9d 100644
--- a/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
+++ b/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
@@ -45,7 +45,6 @@ void percpu_counter_set(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount);
 void percpu_counter_add_batch(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount,
 			      s32 batch);
 s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc);
-s64 percpu_counter_sum_all(struct percpu_counter *fbc);
 int __percpu_counter_compare(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 rhs, s32 batch);
 void percpu_counter_sync(struct percpu_counter *fbc);
 
@@ -196,11 +195,6 @@ static inline s64 percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
 	return percpu_counter_read(fbc);
 }
 
-static inline s64 percpu_counter_sum_all(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
-{
-	return percpu_counter_read(fbc);
-}
-
 static inline bool percpu_counter_initialized(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
 {
 	return true;
diff --git a/lib/percpu_counter.c b/lib/percpu_counter.c
index 0e096311e0c0..5004463c4f9f 100644
--- a/lib/percpu_counter.c
+++ b/lib/percpu_counter.c
@@ -122,23 +122,6 @@ void percpu_counter_sync(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(percpu_counter_sync);
 
-static s64 __percpu_counter_sum_mask(struct percpu_counter *fbc,
-			      const struct cpumask *cpu_mask)
-{
-	s64 ret;
-	int cpu;
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&fbc->lock, flags);
-	ret = fbc->count;
-	for_each_cpu_or(cpu, cpu_online_mask, cpu_mask) {
-		s32 *pcount = per_cpu_ptr(fbc->counters, cpu);
-		ret += *pcount;
-	}
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fbc->lock, flags);
-	return ret;
-}
-
 /*
  * Add up all the per-cpu counts, return the result.  This is a more accurate
  * but much slower version of percpu_counter_read_positive().
@@ -153,22 +136,21 @@ static s64 __percpu_counter_sum_mask(struct percpu_counter *fbc,
  */
 s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
 {
+	s64 ret;
+	int cpu;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
-	return __percpu_counter_sum_mask(fbc, cpu_dying_mask);
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&fbc->lock, flags);
+	ret = fbc->count;
+	for_each_cpu_or(cpu, cpu_online_mask, cpu_dying_mask) {
+		s32 *pcount = per_cpu_ptr(fbc->counters, cpu);
+		ret += *pcount;
+	}
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fbc->lock, flags);
+	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__percpu_counter_sum);
 
-/*
- * This is slower version of percpu_counter_sum as it traverses all possible
- * cpus. Use this only in the cases where accurate data is needed in the
- * presense of CPUs getting offlined.
- */
-s64 percpu_counter_sum_all(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
-{
-	return __percpu_counter_sum_mask(fbc, cpu_possible_mask);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(percpu_counter_sum_all);
-
 int __percpu_counter_init(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount, gfp_t gfp,
 			  struct lock_class_key *key)
 {
-- 
2.39.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-15  8:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-15  8:49 [PATCH 0/4] pcpctr: fix percpu_counter_sum vs cpu offline race Dave Chinner
2023-03-15  8:49 ` [PATCH 1/4] cpumask: introduce for_each_cpu_or Dave Chinner
2023-03-15  8:49 ` [PATCH 2/4] pcpcntrs: fix dying cpu summation race Dave Chinner
2023-03-15  8:49 ` [PATCH 3/4] fork: remove use of percpu_counter_sum_all Dave Chinner
2023-03-15  8:49 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2023-03-15 19:22   ` [PATCH 4/4] pcpcntr: remove percpu_counter_sum_all() kernel test robot
2023-03-15 20:55     ` Dave Chinner
2023-03-17  2:22       ` Yujie Liu
2023-03-15 20:14   ` kernel test robot
2023-03-15 21:21     ` Darrick J. Wong
     [not found] ` <20230315233618.2168-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2023-03-18  0:37   ` [PATCH 2/4] pcpcntrs: fix dying cpu summation race Dave Chinner
2023-03-18  0:41 ` [PATCH 0/4] pcpctr: fix percpu_counter_sum vs cpu offline race Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230315084938.2544737-5-david@fromorbit.com \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yebin10@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).