linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3][RESEND] fs: add infrastructure for opportunistic high-res ctime/mtime updates
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 17:07:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230411-unwesen-prunk-cb7de3cc6cc8@brauner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230411143702.64495-2-jlayton@kernel.org>

On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 10:37:00AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> The VFS always uses coarse-grained timestamp updates for filling out the
> ctime and mtime after a change. This has the benefit of allowing
> filesystems to optimize away metadata updates.
> 
> Unfortunately, this has always been an issue when we're exporting via
> NFSv3, which relies on timestamps to validate caches. Even with NFSv4, a
> lot of exported filesystems don't properly support a change attribute
> and are subject to the same problem of timestamp granularity. Other
> applications have similar issues (e.g backup applications).
> 
> Switching to always using high resolution timestamps would improve the
> situation for NFS, but that becomes rather expensive, as we'd have to
> log a lot more metadata updates.
> 
> This patch grabs a new i_state bit to use as a flag that filesystems can
> set in their getattr routine to indicate that the mtime or ctime was
> queried since it was last updated.
> 
> It then adds a new current_cmtime function that acts like the
> current_time helper, but will conditionally grab high-res timestamps
> when the i_state flag is set in the inode.
> 
> This allows NFS and other applications to reap the benefits of high-res
> ctime and mtime timestamps, but at a substantially lower cost than
> fetching them every time.
> 
> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> ---
>  fs/inode.c         | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  fs/stat.c          | 10 ++++++++++
>  include/linux/fs.h |  5 ++++-
>  3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
> index 4558dc2f1355..3630f67fd042 100644
> --- a/fs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/inode.c
> @@ -2062,6 +2062,42 @@ static int __file_update_time(struct file *file, struct timespec64 *now,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * current_cmtime - Return FS time (possibly high-res)
> + * @inode: inode.
> + *
> + * Return the current time truncated to the time granularity supported by
> + * the fs, as suitable for a ctime or mtime change. If something recently
> + * fetched the ctime or mtime out of the inode via getattr, then get a
> + * high-resolution timestamp.
> + *
> + * Note that inode and inode->sb cannot be NULL.
> + * Otherwise, the function warns and returns coarse time without truncation.
> + */
> +struct timespec64 current_cmtime(struct inode *inode)
> +{
> +	struct timespec64 now;
> +
> +	if (unlikely(!inode->i_sb)) {
> +		WARN(1, "%s() called with uninitialized super_block in the inode", __func__);

How would this happen? Seems weird to even bother checking this.

> +		ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64(&now);
> +		return now;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Do a lockless check for the flag before taking the spinlock */
> +	if (READ_ONCE(inode->i_state) & I_CMTIME_QUERIED) {
> +		ktime_get_real_ts64(&now);
> +		spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> +		inode->i_state &= ~I_CMTIME_QUERIED;
> +		spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> +	} else {
> +		ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64(&now);
> +	}
> +
> +	return timestamp_truncate(now, inode);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(current_cmtime);
> +
>  /**
>   * file_update_time - update mtime and ctime time
>   * @file: file accessed
> @@ -2080,7 +2116,7 @@ int file_update_time(struct file *file)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  	struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
> -	struct timespec64 now = current_time(inode);
> +	struct timespec64 now = current_cmtime(inode);
>  
>  	ret = inode_needs_update_time(inode, &now);
>  	if (ret <= 0)
> @@ -2109,7 +2145,7 @@ static int file_modified_flags(struct file *file, int flags)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  	struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
> -	struct timespec64 now = current_time(inode);
> +	struct timespec64 now = current_cmtime(inode);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Clear the security bits if the process is not being run by root.
> diff --git a/fs/stat.c b/fs/stat.c
> index 7c238da22ef0..d8b80a2e36b7 100644
> --- a/fs/stat.c
> +++ b/fs/stat.c
> @@ -64,6 +64,16 @@ void generic_fillattr(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct inode *inode,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(generic_fillattr);
>  
> +void fill_cmtime_and_mark(struct inode *inode, struct kstat *stat)
> +{
> +	spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> +	inode->i_state |= I_CMTIME_QUERIED;
> +	stat->ctime = inode->i_ctime;
> +	stat->mtime = inode->i_mtime;
> +	spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(fill_cmtime_and_mark);

So that means that each stat call would mark an inode for a
high-resolution update. There's some performance concerns here. Calling
stat() is super common and it would potentially make the next iop more
expensive. Recursively changing ownership in the container use-case come
to mind which are already expensive.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-11 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-11 14:36 [RFC PATCH 0/3][RESEND] fs: opportunistic high-res file timestamps Jeff Layton
2023-04-11 14:37 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3][RESEND] fs: add infrastructure for opportunistic high-res ctime/mtime updates Jeff Layton
2023-04-11 14:42   ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-04-11 14:54     ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-11 15:07   ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2023-04-11 16:04     ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-21 10:23       ` Jan Kara
2023-04-11 14:37 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3][RESEND] shmem: mark for high-res timestamps on next update after getattr Jeff Layton
2023-04-24  7:20   ` kernel test robot
2023-04-11 14:37 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3][RESEND] xfs: mark the inode for high-res timestamp update in getattr Jeff Layton
2023-04-11 14:54   ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-04-11 15:15     ` Christian Brauner
2023-04-11 16:05       ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-11 15:58     ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-21  2:04   ` kernel test robot
2023-04-11 23:13 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3][RESEND] fs: opportunistic high-res file timestamps Dave Chinner
2023-04-15 11:35 ` Amir Goldstein
2023-04-15 12:13   ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-15 16:19   ` [RFC PATCH 0/3][RESEND] " Chuck Lever III

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230411-unwesen-prunk-cb7de3cc6cc8@brauner \
    --to=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).