From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] block: introduce holder ops
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 15:14:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230517-holzfiguren-anbot-490e5a7f74fe@brauner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230517120259.GA16915@lst.de>
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 02:02:59PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 10:42:01AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > So with an O_PATH fd the device wouldn't really be opened at all we'd
> > just hold a reference to a struct file with f->f_op set to empty_fops.
> > (See the FMODE_PATH code in fs/open.c:do_dentry_open().)
> >
> > So blkdev_open() is never called for O_PATH fds. Consequently an O_PATH
> > fd to a block device would only be useful if the intention is to later
> > lookup the block device based on inode->i_rdev.
>
> Yes. That's pretty much the definition of O_PATH..
>
> > So my earlier question should have been why there's no method to lookup
> > a block device purely by non-O_PATH fd since that way you do actually
> > pin the block device which is probably what you almost always want to do.
>
> Why would we want to pin it? That just means the device is open and
> you're have a non-O_PATH mount.
I think we're talking past each other. Both an O_PATH fd and a regular
fd would work. But its often desirable to pass a regular fd. If
userspace uses an O_PATH fd then the block device could be looked up
later during mounting via blkdev_open().
But when you use a regular fd blkdev_open() will be called and the
device resolved right at open time and we'll hold a reference to it.
So that way userspace can immediately know whether the device can be
opened/found. That's usually preferable. That's all I meant to say.
>
> > I'm asking because it would be nice if we could allow callers to specify
> > the source of a filesystem mount as an fd and not just as a string as
> > the mount api currently does. That's probably not super straightforward
> > but might be really worth it.
>
> What you seem to want is a way to convert an O_PATH fs into a non-O_PATH
> one. Which seems generally useful, but isn't really anything block
> device specific.
That already exists, indirectly. You can reopen an O_PATH fd via
/proc/$pid/$nr. And Aleksa is working on O_EMPTYPATH to make this a
first class API including restrictions for how an O_PATH fd can be
reopened. We discussed that during LSFMM.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-17 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-05 17:51 introduce bdev holder ops and a file system shutdown method Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-05 17:51 ` [PATCH 1/9] block: consolidate the shutdown logic in blk_mark_disk_dead and del_gendisk Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-07 19:08 ` Jan Kara
2023-05-09 13:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-05 17:51 ` [PATCH 2/9] block: avoid repeated work in blk_mark_disk_dead Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-07 19:05 ` Jan Kara
2023-05-16 16:29 ` Christian Brauner
2023-05-05 17:51 ` [PATCH 3/9] block: factor out a bd_end_claim helper from blkdev_put Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-07 19:08 ` Jan Kara
2023-05-16 16:29 ` Christian Brauner
2023-05-05 17:51 ` [PATCH 4/9] block: turn bdev_lock into a mutex Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-07 19:09 ` Jan Kara
2023-05-16 16:24 ` Christian Brauner
2023-05-05 17:51 ` [PATCH 5/9] block: introduce holder ops Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-05 18:51 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-05-09 13:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-09 22:19 ` Dave Chinner
2023-05-10 1:38 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-05-10 15:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-07 19:12 ` Jan Kara
2023-05-16 11:02 ` Ming Lei
2023-05-16 14:36 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-05-17 7:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-16 16:00 ` Christian Brauner
2023-05-17 7:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-17 7:57 ` Christian Brauner
2023-05-17 8:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-17 8:42 ` Christian Brauner
2023-05-17 12:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-17 13:14 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2023-05-17 14:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-18 8:13 ` Christian Brauner
2023-05-18 13:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-18 13:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-18 13:56 ` Christian Brauner
2023-05-05 17:51 ` [PATCH 6/9] block: add a mark_dead holder operation Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-05 18:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-05-09 13:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-07 19:19 ` Jan Kara
2023-05-09 13:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-16 16:17 ` Christian Brauner
2023-05-05 17:51 ` [PATCH 7/9] fs: add a method to shut down the file system Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-05 18:39 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-05-07 19:20 ` Jan Kara
2023-05-16 16:20 ` Christian Brauner
2023-05-17 7:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-05 17:51 ` [PATCH 8/9] xfs: wire up sops->shutdown Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-05 18:23 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-05-09 13:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-05 17:51 ` [PATCH 9/9] xfs: wire up the ->mark_dead holder operation for log and RT devices Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-05 18:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-05-08 15:20 ` introduce bdev holder ops and a file system shutdown method Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230517-holzfiguren-anbot-490e5a7f74fe@brauner \
--to=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).