From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] block: introduce holder ops
Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 15:56:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230518-erdkruste-unteilbar-cb91c62511c9@brauner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230518131216.GA32076@lst.de>
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 03:12:16PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 10:13:04AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > Fwiw, I didn't mean to have a special device handler for an O_PATH fd.
> > I really just tried to figure out whether it would make sense to have an
> > fd-based block device lookup function because right now we only have
> > blkdev_get_by_path() and we'd be passing blkdev fds through the mount
> > api. But I understand now how I'd likely do it. So now just finding time
> > to actually implement it.
>
> What's wrong with blkdev_get_by_dev(file_inode(file)->i_rdev) after
> the sanity checks from lookup_bdev (S_ISBLK and may_open_dev)?
Yeah, that's what I realized could work fine. I just need to check all
fses how they currently do this and how to do this cleanly.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-18 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-05 17:51 introduce bdev holder ops and a file system shutdown method Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-05 17:51 ` [PATCH 1/9] block: consolidate the shutdown logic in blk_mark_disk_dead and del_gendisk Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-07 19:08 ` Jan Kara
2023-05-09 13:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-05 17:51 ` [PATCH 2/9] block: avoid repeated work in blk_mark_disk_dead Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-07 19:05 ` Jan Kara
2023-05-16 16:29 ` Christian Brauner
2023-05-05 17:51 ` [PATCH 3/9] block: factor out a bd_end_claim helper from blkdev_put Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-07 19:08 ` Jan Kara
2023-05-16 16:29 ` Christian Brauner
2023-05-05 17:51 ` [PATCH 4/9] block: turn bdev_lock into a mutex Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-07 19:09 ` Jan Kara
2023-05-16 16:24 ` Christian Brauner
2023-05-05 17:51 ` [PATCH 5/9] block: introduce holder ops Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-05 18:51 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-05-09 13:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-09 22:19 ` Dave Chinner
2023-05-10 1:38 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-05-10 15:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-07 19:12 ` Jan Kara
2023-05-16 11:02 ` Ming Lei
2023-05-16 14:36 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-05-17 7:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-16 16:00 ` Christian Brauner
2023-05-17 7:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-17 7:57 ` Christian Brauner
2023-05-17 8:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-17 8:42 ` Christian Brauner
2023-05-17 12:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-17 13:14 ` Christian Brauner
2023-05-17 14:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-18 8:13 ` Christian Brauner
2023-05-18 13:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-18 13:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-18 13:56 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2023-05-05 17:51 ` [PATCH 6/9] block: add a mark_dead holder operation Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-05 18:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-05-09 13:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-07 19:19 ` Jan Kara
2023-05-09 13:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-16 16:17 ` Christian Brauner
2023-05-05 17:51 ` [PATCH 7/9] fs: add a method to shut down the file system Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-05 18:39 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-05-07 19:20 ` Jan Kara
2023-05-16 16:20 ` Christian Brauner
2023-05-17 7:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-05 17:51 ` [PATCH 8/9] xfs: wire up sops->shutdown Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-05 18:23 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-05-09 13:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-05 17:51 ` [PATCH 9/9] xfs: wire up the ->mark_dead holder operation for log and RT devices Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-05 18:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-05-08 15:20 ` introduce bdev holder ops and a file system shutdown method Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230518-erdkruste-unteilbar-cb91c62511c9@brauner \
--to=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).