From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] binfmt_elf: dynamically allocate note.data in parse_elf_properties
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 14:19:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202306071417.79F70AC@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230607144227.8956-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 04:42:27PM +0200, Christian Marangi wrote:
> Dynamically allocate note.data in parse_elf_properties to fix
> compilation warning on some arch.
I'd rather avoid dynamic allocation as much as possible in the exec
path, but we can balance it against how much it may happen.
> On some arch note.data exceed the stack limit for a single function and
> this cause the following compilation warning:
> fs/binfmt_elf.c: In function 'parse_elf_properties.isra':
> fs/binfmt_elf.c:821:1: error: the frame size of 1040 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]
> 821 | }
> | ^
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Which architectures see this warning?
> Fix this by dynamically allocating the array.
> Update the sizeof of the union to the biggest element allocated.
How common are these notes? I assume they're very common; I see them
even in /bin/true:
$ readelf -lW /bin/true | grep PROP
GNU_PROPERTY 0x000338 0x0000000000000338 0x0000000000000338 0x000030 0x000030 R 0x8
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-07 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-07 14:42 [PATCH] binfmt_elf: dynamically allocate note.data in parse_elf_properties Christian Marangi
2023-06-07 21:19 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2023-06-07 18:31 ` Christian Marangi
2023-06-07 23:37 ` Kees Cook
2023-06-12 8:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202306071417.79F70AC@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).