From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DE26C7EE29
	for <linux-fsdevel@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu,  8 Jun 2023 09:05:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S235102AbjFHJEw (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 8 Jun 2023 05:04:52 -0400
Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53600 "EHLO
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S231359AbjFHJEu (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 8 Jun 2023 05:04:50 -0400
Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211])
        by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 565DB1721;
        Thu,  8 Jun 2023 02:04:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407)
        id A178768AA6; Thu,  8 Jun 2023 11:04:44 +0200 (CEST)
Date:   Thu, 8 Jun 2023 11:04:44 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To:     Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
        Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
        "Md. Haris Iqbal" <haris.iqbal@ionos.com>,
        Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@ionos.com>, Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
        Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, dm-devel@redhat.com,
        linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
        linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/31] cdrom: remove the unused mode argument to
 cdrom_release
Message-ID: <20230608090444.GA15075@lst.de>
References: <20230606073950.225178-1-hch@lst.de> <20230606073950.225178-7-hch@lst.de> <ZH+6qd1W75G49P7p@equinox> <20230608084129.GA14689@lst.de> <ZIGVn9E9ME26V0Gn@equinox>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZIGVn9E9ME26V0Gn@equinox>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 09:47:27AM +0100, Phillip Potter wrote:
> Yes indeed - I was under the impression it was appropriate for a
> maintainer to signal their approval of a patch to maintained code using
> a Signed-off-by tag due to their involvement in the submission process?
> Apologies if I've got this wrong, happy to send Reviewed-bys by all
> means.

Signed-off-by is for the chain that the patches pass through.  You add
it when you apply or forward the patch.  Just give me a Reviewed-by
tag and say it shold apply to patches 1 to 6 and I'll add it.