linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org,
	syzbot <syzbot+0ad741797f4565e7e2d2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
	syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] nilfs2: fix general protection fault in nilfs_lookup_dirty_data_buffers()
Date: Sat,  5 Aug 2023 22:20:38 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230805132038.6435-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0000000000002930a705fc32b231@google.com>

A syzbot stress test reported that create_empty_buffers() called from
nilfs_lookup_dirty_data_buffers() can cause a general protection fault.

Analysis using its reproducer revealed that the back reference "mapping"
from a page/folio has been changed to NULL after dirty page/folio gang
lookup in nilfs_lookup_dirty_data_buffers().

Fix this issue by excluding pages/folios from being collected if, after
acquiring a lock on each page/folio, its back reference "mapping"
differs from the pointer to the address space struct that held the
page/folio.

Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+0ad741797f4565e7e2d2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/0000000000002930a705fc32b231@google.com
Tested-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
---
 fs/nilfs2/segment.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c b/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
index 581691e4be49..7ec16879756e 100644
--- a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
+++ b/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
@@ -725,6 +725,11 @@ static size_t nilfs_lookup_dirty_data_buffers(struct inode *inode,
 		struct folio *folio = fbatch.folios[i];
 
 		folio_lock(folio);
+		if (unlikely(folio->mapping != mapping)) {
+			/* Exclude folios removed from the address space */
+			folio_unlock(folio);
+			continue;
+		}
 		head = folio_buffers(folio);
 		if (!head) {
 			create_empty_buffers(&folio->page, i_blocksize(inode), 0);
-- 
2.34.1


      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-05 13:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-21 11:45 [syzbot] [nilfs?] general protection fault in folio_create_empty_buffers syzbot
2023-08-04 15:41 ` syzbot
2023-08-05 13:20 ` Ryusuke Konishi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230805132038.6435-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com \
    --to=konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+0ad741797f4565e7e2d2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).