From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] super: wait until we passed kill super
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 12:47:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230817-vfs-super-fixes-v3-v1-3-06ddeca7059b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230817-vfs-super-fixes-v3-v1-0-06ddeca7059b@kernel.org>
Recent rework moved block device closing out of sb->put_super() and into
sb->kill_sb() to avoid deadlocks as s_umount is held in put_super() and
blkdev_put() can end up taking s_umount again.
That means we need to move the removal of the superblock from @fs_supers
out of generic_shutdown_super() and into deactivate_locked_super() to
ensure that concurrent mounters don't fail to open block devices that
are still in use because blkdev_put() in sb->kill_sb() hasn't been
called yet.
We can now do this as we can make iterators through @fs_super and
@super_blocks wait without holding s_umount. Concurrent mounts will wait
until a dying superblock is fully dead so until sb->kill_sb() has been
called and SB_DEAD been set. Concurrent iterators can already discard
any SB_DYING superblock.
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
---
fs/super.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
include/linux/fs.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
index 55bf495763d9..710448078c07 100644
--- a/fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/super.c
@@ -98,6 +98,18 @@ static inline bool wait_born(struct super_block *sb)
return flags & (SB_BORN | SB_DYING);
}
+static inline bool wait_dead(struct super_block *sb)
+{
+ unsigned int flags;
+
+ /*
+ * Pairs with smp_store_release() in super_wake() and ensure
+ * that we see SB_DEAD after we're woken.
+ */
+ flags = smp_load_acquire(&sb->s_flags);
+ return flags & SB_DEAD;
+}
+
/**
* super_wait - wait for superblock to become ready
* @sb: superblock to wait for
@@ -144,6 +156,19 @@ static bool super_wait(struct super_block *sb, bool excl)
goto relock;
}
+static bool super_wait_dead(struct super_block *sb)
+{
+ if (super_wait(sb, true))
+ return true;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&sb->s_umount);
+ super_unlock_write(sb);
+ /* If superblock is dying, wait for everything to be shutdown. */
+ wait_var_event(&sb->s_flags, wait_dead(sb));
+ super_lock_write(sb);
+ return false;
+}
+
/* wait and acquire read-side of @sb->s_umount */
static inline bool super_wait_read(struct super_block *sb)
{
@@ -169,6 +194,22 @@ static void super_wake(struct super_block *sb, unsigned int flag)
wake_up_var(&sb->s_flags);
}
+static int grab_super_wait_dead(struct super_block *s) __releases(sb_lock)
+{
+ bool born;
+
+ s->s_count++;
+ spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
+ born = super_wait_dead(s);
+ if (born && atomic_inc_not_zero(&s->s_active)) {
+ put_super(s);
+ return 1;
+ }
+ up_write(&s->s_umount);
+ put_super(s);
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* One thing we have to be careful of with a per-sb shrinker is that we don't
* drop the last active reference to the superblock from within the shrinker.
@@ -456,6 +497,25 @@ void deactivate_locked_super(struct super_block *s)
list_lru_destroy(&s->s_dentry_lru);
list_lru_destroy(&s->s_inode_lru);
+ /*
+ * Remove it from @fs_supers so it isn't found by new
+ * sget{_fc}() walkers anymore. Any concurrent mounter still
+ * managing to grab a temporary reference is guaranteed to
+ * already see SB_DYING and will wait until we notify them about
+ * SB_DEAD.
+ */
+ spin_lock(&sb_lock);
+ hlist_del_init(&s->s_instances);
+ spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
+
+ /*
+ * Let concurrent mounts know that this thing is really dead.
+ * We don't need @sb->s_umount here as every concurrent caller
+ * will see SB_DYING and either discard the superblock or wait
+ * for SB_DEAD.
+ */
+ super_wake(s, SB_DEAD);
+
put_filesystem(fs);
put_super(s);
} else {
@@ -638,15 +698,14 @@ void generic_shutdown_super(struct super_block *sb)
spin_unlock(&sb->s_inode_list_lock);
}
}
- spin_lock(&sb_lock);
- /* should be initialized for __put_super_and_need_restart() */
- hlist_del_init(&sb->s_instances);
- spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
/*
* Broadcast to everyone that grabbed a temporary reference to this
* superblock before we removed it from @fs_supers that the superblock
* is dying. Every walker of @fs_supers outside of sget{_fc}() will now
* discard this superblock and treat it as dead.
+ *
+ * We leave the superblock on @fs_supers so it can be found by
+ * sget{_fc}() until we passed sb->kill_sb().
*/
super_wake(sb, SB_DYING);
super_unlock_write(sb);
@@ -741,7 +800,7 @@ struct super_block *sget_fc(struct fs_context *fc,
destroy_unused_super(s);
return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
}
- if (!grab_super(old))
+ if (!grab_super_wait_dead(old))
goto retry;
destroy_unused_super(s);
return old;
@@ -785,7 +844,7 @@ struct super_block *sget(struct file_system_type *type,
destroy_unused_super(s);
return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
}
- if (!grab_super(old))
+ if (!grab_super_wait_dead(old))
goto retry;
destroy_unused_super(s);
return old;
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 173672645156..34ac792c4b19 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1095,6 +1095,7 @@ extern int send_sigurg(struct fown_struct *fown);
#define SB_LAZYTIME BIT(25) /* Update the on-disk [acm]times lazily */
/* These sb flags are internal to the kernel */
+#define SB_DEAD BIT(21)
#define SB_DYING BIT(24)
#define SB_SUBMOUNT BIT(26)
#define SB_FORCE BIT(27)
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-17 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-17 10:47 [PATCH 0/3] super: allow waiting without s_umount held Christian Brauner
2023-08-17 10:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] super: use super_{lock,unlock}() Christian Brauner
2023-08-17 11:39 ` Jan Kara
2023-08-17 10:47 ` [PATCH 2/3] super: wait for nascent superblocks Christian Brauner
2023-08-17 12:50 ` Jan Kara
2023-08-17 13:24 ` Christian Brauner
2023-08-17 13:41 ` Christian Brauner
2023-08-17 14:16 ` Jan Kara
2023-08-17 14:30 ` Christian Brauner
2023-08-17 20:53 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-18 10:56 ` Christian Brauner
2023-08-17 10:47 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2023-08-17 14:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] super: wait until we passed kill super Jan Kara
2023-08-17 14:54 ` Christian Brauner
2023-08-17 16:27 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230817-vfs-super-fixes-v3-v1-3-06ddeca7059b@kernel.org \
--to=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).