linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com, ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, teigland@redhat.com,
	rpeterso@redhat.com, agruenba@redhat.com,
	trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com, anna@kernel.org,
	chuck.lever@oracle.com, jlayton@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] lockd: fix race in async lock request handling
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 17:33:48 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230823213352.1971009-4-aahringo@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230823213352.1971009-1-aahringo@redhat.com>

This patch fixes a race in async lock request handling between adding
the relevant struct nlm_block to nlm_blocked list after the request was
sent by vfs_lock_file() and nlmsvc_grant_deferred() does a lookup of the
nlm_block in the nlm_blocked list. It could be that the async request is
completed before the nlm_block was added to the list. This would end
in a -ENOENT and a kernel log message of "lockd: grant for unknown
block".

To solve this issue we add the nlm_block before the vfs_lock_file() call
to be sure it has been added when a possible nlmsvc_grant_deferred() is
called. If the vfs_lock_file() results in an case when it wouldn't be
added to nlm_blocked list, the nlm_block struct will be removed from
this list again.

The introducing of the new B_PENDING_CALLBACK nlm_block flag will handle
async lock requests on a pending lock requests as a retry on the caller
level to hit the -EAGAIN case.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
---
 fs/lockd/svclock.c | 11 ++++++++---
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/lockd/svclock.c b/fs/lockd/svclock.c
index aa4174fbaf5b..3b158446203b 100644
--- a/fs/lockd/svclock.c
+++ b/fs/lockd/svclock.c
@@ -546,6 +546,9 @@ nlmsvc_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_file *file,
 		ret = nlm_lck_blocked;
 		goto out;
 	}
+
+	/* Append to list of blocked */
+	nlmsvc_insert_block_locked(block, NLM_NEVER);
 	spin_unlock(&nlm_blocked_lock);
 
 	if (!wait)
@@ -557,9 +560,12 @@ nlmsvc_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_file *file,
 	dprintk("lockd: vfs_lock_file returned %d\n", error);
 	switch (error) {
 		case 0:
+			nlmsvc_remove_block(block);
 			ret = nlm_granted;
 			goto out;
 		case -EAGAIN:
+			if (!wait)
+				nlmsvc_remove_block(block);
 			ret = async_block ? nlm_lck_blocked : nlm_lck_denied;
 			goto out;
 		case FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED:
@@ -570,17 +576,16 @@ nlmsvc_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_file *file,
 			ret = nlmsvc_defer_lock_rqst(rqstp, block);
 			goto out;
 		case -EDEADLK:
+			nlmsvc_remove_block(block);
 			ret = nlm_deadlock;
 			goto out;
 		default:			/* includes ENOLCK */
+			nlmsvc_remove_block(block);
 			ret = nlm_lck_denied_nolocks;
 			goto out;
 	}
 
 	ret = nlm_lck_blocked;
-
-	/* Append to list of blocked */
-	nlmsvc_insert_block(block, NLM_NEVER);
 out:
 	mutex_unlock(&file->f_mutex);
 	nlmsvc_release_block(block);
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-23 21:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-23 21:33 [PATCH 0/7] lockd: dlm: async lock request changes Alexander Aring
2023-08-23 21:33 ` [PATCH 1/7] lockd: introduce safe async lock op Alexander Aring
2023-08-25 17:21   ` Chuck Lever
2023-08-30 12:32     ` Alexander Aring
2023-08-30 13:45       ` Chuck Lever
2023-08-25 18:14   ` Jeff Layton
2024-09-10 14:18   ` Benjamin Coddington
2024-09-10 15:45     ` Jeff Layton
2024-09-10 16:56       ` Benjamin Coddington
2024-09-10 17:17         ` Alexander Aring
2024-09-11 13:24         ` Jeff Layton
2024-09-11 14:35           ` Benjamin Coddington
2024-09-10 17:13       ` Alexander Aring
2023-08-23 21:33 ` [PATCH 2/7] lockd: don't call vfs_lock_file() for pending requests Alexander Aring
2023-08-25 18:10   ` Jeff Layton
2023-08-30 12:15     ` Alexander Aring
2023-08-23 21:33 ` Alexander Aring [this message]
2023-08-25 17:35   ` [PATCH 3/7] lockd: fix race in async lock request handling Chuck Lever
2023-08-25 18:16   ` Jeff Layton
2023-08-23 21:33 ` [PATCH 4/7] lockd: add doc to enable EXPORT_OP_SAFE_ASYNC_LOCK Alexander Aring
2023-08-25 18:17   ` Jeff Layton
2023-08-23 21:33 ` [PATCH 5/7] dlm: use fl_owner from lockd Alexander Aring
2023-08-23 21:33 ` [PATCH 6/7] dlm: use FL_SLEEP to determine blocking vs non-blocking Alexander Aring
2023-08-25 18:18   ` Jeff Layton
2023-08-30 12:38     ` Alexander Aring
2023-08-30 13:46       ` Jeff Layton
2023-08-23 21:33 ` [PATCH 7/7] dlm: implement EXPORT_OP_SAFE_ASYNC_LOCK Alexander Aring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230823213352.1971009-4-aahringo@redhat.com \
    --to=aahringo@redhat.com \
    --cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
    --cc=anna@kernel.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=rpeterso@redhat.com \
    --cc=teigland@redhat.com \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).