From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11B3AC71153 for ; Tue, 29 Aug 2023 14:11:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236816AbjH2OKb (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Aug 2023 10:10:31 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37646 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236801AbjH2OKA (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Aug 2023 10:10:00 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26068C0 for ; Tue, 29 Aug 2023 07:09:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 009A668B05; Tue, 29 Aug 2023 16:09:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 16:09:53 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Christian Brauner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jan Kara , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: mtd Message-ID: <20230829140953.GA31558@lst.de> References: <20230829-weitab-lauwarm-49c40fc85863@brauner> <20230829125118.GA24767@lst.de> <20230829-erzeugen-verruf-6c06640844b0@brauner> <20230829-abkassieren-pizzen-c34ca3731a5c@brauner> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230829-abkassieren-pizzen-c34ca3731a5c@brauner> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 03:41:04PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 02:57:02PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 02:51:18PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 01:46:20PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > > > > Something like the following might already be enough (IT'S A DRAFT, AND > > > > UNTESTED, AND PROBABLY BROKEN)? > > > > > > It's probably the right thing conceptually, but it will also need > > > the SB_I_RETIRED from test_bdev_super_fc or even just reuse > > > test_bdev_super_fc after that's been renamed to be more generic. > > > > I'll rename it and use it. Let me send a patch. > > Hmkay, how does that look? I think this is a fairly acceptable change > and looks better than the mtd special-test/set-sauce we currently have: Looks sensibe to me, but please run it past the MTD maintainers.