linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] fs: don't update the atime if existing atime is newer than "now"
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2023 12:33:48 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230907-ctime-fixes-v1-2-3b74c970d934@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230907-ctime-fixes-v1-0-3b74c970d934@kernel.org>

It's possible for the atime to be updated with a fine-grained timestamp
and then later get an update that uses a coarse-grained timestamp which
makes the atime appear to go backward.

Fix this by only updating the atime if "now" is later than the current
value.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202309071017.a64aca5e-oliver.sang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
---
 fs/inode.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index 54237f4242ff..cf4726b7f4b5 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -1905,7 +1905,7 @@ int inode_update_timestamps(struct inode *inode, int flags)
 	}
 
 	if (flags & S_ATIME) {
-		if (!timespec64_equal(&now, &inode->i_atime)) {
+		if (timespec64_compare(&inode->i_atime, &now) < 0) {
 			inode->i_atime = now;
 			updated |= S_ATIME;
 		}
@@ -1991,7 +1991,7 @@ bool atime_needs_update(const struct path *path, struct inode *inode)
 	if (!relatime_need_update(mnt, inode, now))
 		return false;
 
-	if (timespec64_equal(&inode->i_atime, &now))
+	if (timespec64_compare(&inode->i_atime, &now) >= 0)
 		return false;
 
 	return true;

-- 
2.41.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-09-07 17:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-07 16:33 [PATCH 0/2] fs: fixes for multigrain ctime code Jeff Layton
2023-09-07 16:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] fs: initialize inode->__i_ctime to the epoch Jeff Layton
2023-09-08 10:42   ` Jan Kara
2023-09-08 11:41     ` Jeff Layton
2023-09-08 12:10       ` Jan Kara
2023-09-07 16:33 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2023-09-08 12:11   ` [PATCH 2/2] fs: don't update the atime if existing atime is newer than "now" Jan Kara
2023-09-08 12:10 ` [PATCH 0/2] fs: fixes for multigrain ctime code Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230907-ctime-fixes-v1-2-3b74c970d934@kernel.org \
    --to=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).