From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DD52E7D271 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 10:08:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234327AbjIZKI4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Sep 2023 06:08:56 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48532 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229674AbjIZKIz (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Sep 2023 06:08:55 -0400 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65BD497 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 03:08:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 881B3C433C7; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 10:08:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1695722928; bh=zykksIGqZoBdbMss/bnZGnUX9BMIwBK5x+gpg5W14as=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=rRaakjMgpEzIU6gDUxwG76Bi5f2HsTL0XZeNI102ywyROvfzBjtpc4k2HZWBFyT4L FzXDLZYEEGXnlz7m/uWijbHp6+LPAFHvSm6eeX2MJjA1yRZzuwJpK/gR0VFO8JT47j pRo+iE9U/2JJzL9vu0fAA59mObN5WNU24L8Azja1XQxW2MNLp40MEwUpxvCC35QDlt p2oGqCnXMAe72rOqTEVqPLotw2zHcJOwLHZnVKKlet02oo9P+0CglrUmZZM7TUJeRd tYmjjvFbUR4JLamFpMyZ5dLyPZtN2X9JyeuxVDJ9rVfJf0qQJXhcsFvj5nJjx0+UCK ykkDFeoibXl0w== Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:08:43 +0200 From: Christian Brauner To: Amir Goldstein Cc: Reuben Hawkins , Matthew Wilcox , kernel test robot , Cyril Hrubis , mszeredi@redhat.com, lkp@intel.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, ltp@lists.linux.it, Jan Kara Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] vfs: fix readahead(2) on block devices Message-ID: <20230926-leinen-kaltlassen-b5cef5a1e877@brauner> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org > What you are saying makes sense. > And if we are being honest, I think that the right thing to do from the > beginning was to separate the bug fix commit from the UAPI change. > > The minimal bug fix is S_ISREG || S_ISBLK, which > mentions the Fixes commit and will be picked for stable kernels. > > Following up with another one or two patches that change > the behavior of posix_fadvise on socket and readahead on > socket and pipe. > > The UAPI change is not something that has to go to stable > and it should be easily revertable independently of the bug fix. > Doing it otherwise would make our lives much harder if regressions > turn up from the UAPI change. > > Christian, Matthew, > > Do you agree? Fine by me.