From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] porting: document block device freeze and thaw changes
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 15:21:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230927-vfs-super-freeze-v1-7-ecc36d9ab4d9@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230927-vfs-super-freeze-v1-0-ecc36d9ab4d9@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
---
Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst
index 4d05b9862451..fef97a2e6729 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst
@@ -1045,3 +1045,28 @@ filesystem type is now moved to a later point when the devices are closed:
As this is a VFS level change it has no practical consequences for filesystems
other than that all of them must use one of the provided kill_litter_super(),
kill_anon_super(), or kill_block_super() helpers.
+
+---
+
+**mandatory**
+
+Block device freezing and thawing have been moved to holder operations. As we
+can now go straight from block devcie to superblock the get_active_super()
+and bd_fsfreeze_sb members in struct block_device are gone.
+
+The bd_fsfreeze_mutex is gone as well since we can rely on the bd_holder_lock
+to protect against concurrent freeze and thaw.
+
+Before this change, get_active_super() would only be able to find the
+superblock of the main block device, i.e., the one stored in sb->s_bdev. Block
+device freezing now works for any block device owned by a given superblock, not
+just the main block device.
+
+When thawing we now grab an active reference so we can hold bd_holder_lock
+across thaw without the risk of deadlocks (because the superblock goes away
+which would require us to take bd_holder_lock). That allows us to get rid of
+bd_fsfreeze_mutex. Currently we just reacquire s_umount after thaw_super() and
+drop the active reference we took before. This someone could grab an active
+reference before we dropped the last one. This shouldn't be an issue. If it
+turns out to be one we can reshuffle the code to simply hold s_umount when
+thaw_super() returns and drop the reference.
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-27 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-27 13:21 [PATCH 0/7] Implement freeze and thaw as holder operations Christian Brauner
2023-09-27 13:21 ` [PATCH 1/7] bdev: rename freeze and thaw helpers Christian Brauner
2023-09-27 14:35 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-10-02 6:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-02 11:28 ` Jan Kara
2023-09-27 13:21 ` [PATCH 2/7] bdev: add freeze and thaw holder operations Christian Brauner
2023-09-27 14:38 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-10-02 6:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-02 16:32 ` Jan Kara
2023-09-27 13:21 ` [PATCH 3/7] bdev: implement " Christian Brauner
2023-09-27 14:53 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-09-27 15:15 ` Christian Brauner
2023-09-27 16:01 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-10-02 6:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-02 7:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-09-27 13:21 ` [PATCH 4/7] fs: remove get_active_super() Christian Brauner
2023-09-27 14:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-10-02 7:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-02 16:22 ` Jan Kara
2023-09-27 13:21 ` [PATCH 5/7] super: remove bd_fsfreeze_{mutex,sb} Christian Brauner
2023-09-27 15:11 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-09-27 15:18 ` Christian Brauner
2023-10-02 7:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-02 16:24 ` Jan Kara
2023-09-27 13:21 ` [PATCH 6/7] fs: remove unused helper Christian Brauner
2023-09-27 15:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-10-02 7:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-02 16:26 ` Jan Kara
2023-09-27 13:21 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2023-09-27 15:19 ` [PATCH 7/7] porting: document block device freeze and thaw changes Darrick J. Wong
2023-10-02 16:45 ` Jan Kara
2023-10-05 6:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230927-vfs-super-freeze-v1-7-ecc36d9ab4d9@kernel.org \
--to=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).