From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, nd@arm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
joey.gouly@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
shuah@kernel.org, will@kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 09/20] arm64: define VM_PKEY_BIT* for arm64
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2023 19:57:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202309301944.jGh1qzvm-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230927140123.5283-10-joey.gouly@arm.com>
Hi Joey,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on arm64/for-next/core]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.6-rc3 next-20230929]
[cannot apply to akpm-mm/mm-everything kvmarm/next]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Joey-Gouly/arm64-sysreg-add-system-register-POR_EL-0-1/20230927-221459
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-next/core
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230927140123.5283-10-joey.gouly%40arm.com
patch subject: [PATCH v1 09/20] arm64: define VM_PKEY_BIT* for arm64
config: arm64-randconfig-001-20230930 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230930/202309301944.jGh1qzvm-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230930/202309301944.jGh1qzvm-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309301944.jGh1qzvm-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from fs/proc/meminfo.c:5:
arch/arm64/include/asm/mman.h: In function 'arch_calc_vm_prot_bits':
>> include/linux/mm.h:346:25: error: 'VM_HIGH_ARCH_2' undeclared (first use in this function)
346 | # define VM_PKEY_BIT0 VM_HIGH_ARCH_2 /* A protection key is a 3-bit value on arm64 */
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/arm64/include/asm/mman.h:20:29: note: in expansion of macro 'VM_PKEY_BIT0'
20 | ret |= pkey & 0x1 ? VM_PKEY_BIT0 : 0;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/mm.h:346:25: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
346 | # define VM_PKEY_BIT0 VM_HIGH_ARCH_2 /* A protection key is a 3-bit value on arm64 */
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/arm64/include/asm/mman.h:20:29: note: in expansion of macro 'VM_PKEY_BIT0'
20 | ret |= pkey & 0x1 ? VM_PKEY_BIT0 : 0;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/mm.h:347:25: error: 'VM_HIGH_ARCH_3' undeclared (first use in this function)
347 | # define VM_PKEY_BIT1 VM_HIGH_ARCH_3
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/arm64/include/asm/mman.h:21:29: note: in expansion of macro 'VM_PKEY_BIT1'
21 | ret |= pkey & 0x2 ? VM_PKEY_BIT1 : 0;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/mm.h:348:25: error: 'VM_HIGH_ARCH_4' undeclared (first use in this function)
348 | # define VM_PKEY_BIT2 VM_HIGH_ARCH_4
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/arm64/include/asm/mman.h:22:29: note: in expansion of macro 'VM_PKEY_BIT2'
22 | ret |= pkey & 0x4 ? VM_PKEY_BIT2 : 0;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +/VM_HIGH_ARCH_2 +346 include/linux/mm.h
343
344 #if defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
345 # define VM_PKEY_SHIFT VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_2
> 346 # define VM_PKEY_BIT0 VM_HIGH_ARCH_2 /* A protection key is a 3-bit value on arm64 */
> 347 # define VM_PKEY_BIT1 VM_HIGH_ARCH_3
> 348 # define VM_PKEY_BIT2 VM_HIGH_ARCH_4
349 # define VM_PKEY_BIT3 0
350 # define VM_PKEY_BIT4 0
351 #endif
352
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-30 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-27 14:01 [PATCH v1 00/20] Permission Overlay Extension Joey Gouly
2023-09-27 14:01 ` [PATCH v1 01/20] arm64/sysreg: add system register POR_EL{0,1} Joey Gouly
2023-10-05 14:03 ` Mark Brown
2023-09-27 14:01 ` [PATCH v1 02/20] arm64/sysreg: update CPACR_EL1 register Joey Gouly
2023-10-05 14:02 ` Mark Brown
2023-09-27 14:01 ` [PATCH v1 03/20] arm64: cpufeature: add Permission Overlay Extension cpucap Joey Gouly
2023-09-27 14:01 ` [PATCH v1 04/20] arm64: disable trapping of POR_EL0 to EL2 Joey Gouly
2023-09-27 14:01 ` [PATCH v1 05/20] arm64: context switch POR_EL0 register Joey Gouly
2023-10-04 16:49 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-05 14:14 ` Mark Brown
2023-10-10 9:54 ` Joey Gouly
2023-10-10 11:47 ` Mark Brown
2023-09-27 14:01 ` [PATCH v1 06/20] KVM: arm64: Save/restore POE registers Joey Gouly
2023-09-28 16:47 ` Oliver Upton
2023-09-27 14:01 ` [PATCH v1 07/20] arm64: enable the Permission Overlay Extension for EL0 Joey Gouly
2023-10-05 14:17 ` Mark Brown
2023-10-05 14:19 ` Mark Brown
2023-09-27 14:01 ` [PATCH v1 08/20] arm64: add POIndex defines Joey Gouly
2023-09-27 14:01 ` [PATCH v1 09/20] arm64: define VM_PKEY_BIT* for arm64 Joey Gouly
2023-09-30 11:57 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2023-10-03 16:51 ` Dave Hansen
2023-09-27 14:01 ` [PATCH v1 10/20] arm64: mask out POIndex when modifying a PTE Joey Gouly
2023-09-27 14:01 ` [PATCH v1 11/20] arm64: enable ARCH_HAS_PKEYS on arm64 Joey Gouly
2023-09-30 13:05 ` kernel test robot
2023-09-27 14:01 ` [PATCH v1 12/20] arm64: handle PKEY/POE faults Joey Gouly
2023-09-27 14:01 ` [PATCH v1 13/20] arm64: stop using generic mm_hooks.h Joey Gouly
2023-09-27 14:01 ` [PATCH v1 14/20] arm64: implement PKEYS support Joey Gouly
2023-09-27 14:01 ` [PATCH v1 15/20] arm64: add POE signal support Joey Gouly
2023-10-05 14:34 ` Mark Brown
2023-10-09 14:49 ` Mark Brown
2023-10-10 9:58 ` Joey Gouly
2023-10-10 11:48 ` Mark Brown
2023-10-10 9:57 ` Joey Gouly
2023-10-10 11:56 ` Mark Brown
2023-09-27 14:01 ` [PATCH v1 16/20] arm64: enable PKEY support for CPUs with S1POE Joey Gouly
2023-09-27 14:01 ` [PATCH v1 17/20] arm64: enable POE and PIE to coexist Joey Gouly
2023-09-27 14:01 ` [PATCH v1 18/20] kselftest/arm64: move get_header() Joey Gouly
2023-09-27 14:01 ` [PATCH v1 19/20] selftests: mm: move fpregs printing Joey Gouly
2023-10-03 16:46 ` Dave Hansen
2023-09-27 14:01 ` [PATCH v1 20/20] selftests: mm: make protection_keys test work on arm64 Joey Gouly
2023-10-03 16:46 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202309301944.jGh1qzvm-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).