linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Mo Zou <lostzoumo@gmail.com>
Cc: brauner@kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: fs: fix directory locking proofs
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 20:06:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231011190638.GV800259@ZenIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHfrynPiUWiB0Vg3-pTi_yC6cER0wYMmCo_V8HZyWAD5Q_m+jQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 10:11:42PM +0800, Mo Zou wrote:
> 
> Consider directories objects A, B, C. The pointer orders are that A < B
> and C < A. And B is ancestor to C, so B < C. Thus we have A < B < C
> < A!
> 
> A concrete deadlock  example can be constructed as follows. Suppose
> the tree has following edges /A and /B/C and A < B and C < A. There are
> three operations forming a deadlock.
> 
> rename(/A, /B) executes: lock /; lock A; (about to lock B)
> unlink(/B/C) executes: lock B; (about to lock C)
> rename(/A/x, /C/y) executes: lock C; (about to lock A)

Nope - your C in line 2 is not C in line 3.

There *IS* a deadlock, but it's more subtle than that.
Look:
# address(/X/A) < address(C) < address(X)
T_1: rename /C/D /X/A/B
T_2: exchange /X /C
T_3: rmdir /X/A
T_1:	looked up /X/A and /C (all in dcache)
T_2:	looked up /
T_3:	looked up /X
T_1:	grabbed ->s_vfs_rename_mutex
T_1:	grabbed /X/A
T_2:	grabbed /
T_2:	grabbed /C
T_3:	grabbed /X
T_2:	tries to grab /X
T_3:	tries to grab /X/A
T_1:	tries to grab /C

      reply	other threads:[~2023-10-11 19:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-11  5:28 [PATCH] Documentation: fs: fix directory locking proofs Mo Zou
2023-10-11  6:46 ` Al Viro
2023-10-11 14:11   ` Mo Zou
2023-10-11 19:06     ` Al Viro [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231011190638.GV800259@ZenIV \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lostzoumo@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).