From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D109D328A6 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 22:43:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linux.org.uk header.i=@linux.org.uk header.b="KdwJiWvh" Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [IPv6:2a03:a000:7:0:5054:ff:fe1c:15ff]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 959D195 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 15:43:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.org.uk; s=zeniv-20220401; h=Sender:In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=omD9ln1E5+fKJwEQjo6x1zEyoxhYRXPhqjkRl53Qz20=; b=KdwJiWvhPu6Ol1d1Di8D3XSCBy HTwZ8g0d+ztloctebGqitsoJuGVLBXoin/e+DO2WrpKWh8hUn0RV6xqBebH7m82RFVPjEmLpKQO0L Xo80v+1TX2NBBoLeFaJRCieqZJoeFpE9KkstE7M5Gng2snck7irdG7cUDF6FppEtAWUcjJjdpMpzV QuYr35wYaMsSIBuRoNG21057PFjFeCFOmRtdBDf3pdbZy2qsY4gxiqKCT+7bxjjKfgiF+s30aKqJg quOnv6LX9aBPGHcqzUR36eL5KaWph6lJgICBnGhmdSqJnxY7a9L40f1BtsHjyYJoO+K/2Kkpki7lA MDCazOfQ==; Received: from viro by zeniv.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qsWIp-001s7J-2M; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 22:43:11 +0000 Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 23:43:11 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Cc: Christian Brauner , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH] chardev: Simplify usage of try_module_get() Message-ID: <20231016224311.GI800259@ZenIV> References: <20231013132441.1406200-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20231013132441.1406200-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Sender: Al Viro X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 03:24:42PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > try_module_get(NULL) is true, so there is no need to check owner being > NULL. > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König > --- > fs/char_dev.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/char_dev.c b/fs/char_dev.c > index 950b6919fb87..6ba032442b39 100644 > --- a/fs/char_dev.c > +++ b/fs/char_dev.c > @@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ static struct kobject *cdev_get(struct cdev *p) > struct module *owner = p->owner; > struct kobject *kobj; > > - if (owner && !try_module_get(owner)) > + if (!try_module_get(owner)) > return NULL; > kobj = kobject_get_unless_zero(&p->kobj); > if (!kobj) I wouldn't mind that, if that logics in try_module_get() was inlined. It isn't...