From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Jesse Hathaway <jesse@mbuki-mvuki.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] attr: block mode changes of symlinks
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 20:40:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2023101819-satisfied-drool-49bb@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANSNSoUYMdPPLuZhofOW6DaKzCF47WhZ+T9BnL8sA37M7b4F+g@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 01:34:13PM -0500, Jesse Hathaway wrote:
> > If this holds up without regressions than all LTSes. That's what Amir
> > and Leah did for some other work. I can add that to the comment for
> > clarity.
>
> Unfortunately, this has not held up in LTSes without causing
> regressions, specifically in crun:
>
> Crun issue and patch
> 1. https://github.com/containers/crun/issues/1308
> 2. https://github.com/containers/crun/pull/1309
So thre's a fix already for this, they agree that symlinks shouldn't
have modes, so what's the issue?
> Debian bug report
> 1. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1053821
Same report.
> I think it should be reverted in LTSes and possibly in upstream.
It needs to reverted in Linus's tree first, otherwise you will hit the
same problem when moving to a new kernel.
> P.S. apologies for not having the correct threading headers. I am not on
> the list.
You can always grab the mail on lore.kernel.org and respond to it there,
you are trying to dig up a months old email and we don't really have any
context at all (I had to go to lore to figure it out...)
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-18 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-18 18:34 [PATCH] attr: block mode changes of symlinks Jesse Hathaway
2023-10-18 18:40 ` Greg KH [this message]
2023-10-18 18:49 ` Jesse Hathaway
2023-10-18 19:09 ` Greg KH
2023-10-20 8:34 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-10-20 11:01 ` Christian Brauner
2023-10-20 13:26 ` Giuseppe Scrivano
2023-10-20 14:25 ` Greg KH
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-07-12 9:56 Christian Brauner
2023-07-12 16:21 ` Greg KH
2023-07-12 17:58 ` Christian Brauner
2023-07-12 16:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-07-12 17:56 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2023101819-satisfied-drool-49bb@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=cyphar@cyphar.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jesse@mbuki-mvuki.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).