linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] simplifying fast_dput(), dentry_kill() et.al.
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 06:12:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231031061226.GC1957730@ZenIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231031015351.GA1957730@ZenIV>

On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 01:53:51AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:

> Carving that series up will be interesting, though...

I think I have a sane carve-up; will post if it survives testing.

Cumulative diff follows:

diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
index 9f471fdb768b..213026d5b033 100644
--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -625,8 +625,6 @@ static void __dentry_kill(struct dentry *dentry)
 static struct dentry *__lock_parent(struct dentry *dentry)
 {
 	struct dentry *parent;
-	rcu_read_lock();
-	spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
 again:
 	parent = READ_ONCE(dentry->d_parent);
 	spin_lock(&parent->d_lock);
@@ -642,7 +640,6 @@ static struct dentry *__lock_parent(struct dentry *dentry)
 		spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
 		goto again;
 	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 	if (parent != dentry)
 		spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
 	else
@@ -657,7 +654,64 @@ static inline struct dentry *lock_parent(struct dentry *dentry)
 		return NULL;
 	if (likely(spin_trylock(&parent->d_lock)))
 		return parent;
-	return __lock_parent(dentry);
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
+	parent = __lock_parent(dentry);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	return parent;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Lock a dentry for feeding it to __dentry_kill().
+ * Called under rcu_read_lock() and dentry->d_lock; the former
+ * guarantees that nothing we access will be freed under us.
+ * Note that dentry is *not* protected from concurrent dentry_kill(),
+ * d_delete(), etc.
+ *
+ * Return false if dentry is busy.  Otherwise, return true and have
+ * that dentry's inode and parent both locked.
+ */
+
+static bool lock_for_kill(struct dentry *dentry)
+{
+	struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
+	struct dentry *parent = dentry->d_parent;
+
+	if (unlikely(dentry->d_lockref.count))
+		return false;
+
+	if (inode && unlikely(!spin_trylock(&inode->i_lock)))
+		goto slow;
+	if (dentry == parent)
+		return true;
+	if (likely(spin_trylock(&parent->d_lock)))
+		return true;
+
+	if (inode)
+		spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+slow:
+	spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
+
+	for (;;) {
+		if (inode)
+			spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
+		parent = __lock_parent(dentry);
+		if (likely(inode == dentry->d_inode))
+			break;
+		if (inode)
+			spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+		inode = dentry->d_inode;
+		spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
+		if (parent)
+			spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
+	}
+	if (likely(!dentry->d_lockref.count))
+		return true;
+	if (inode)
+		spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+	if (parent)
+		spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
+	return false;
 }
 
 static inline bool retain_dentry(struct dentry *dentry)
@@ -680,7 +734,6 @@ static inline bool retain_dentry(struct dentry *dentry)
 		return false;
 
 	/* retain; LRU fodder */
-	dentry->d_lockref.count--;
 	if (unlikely(!(dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_LRU_LIST)))
 		d_lru_add(dentry);
 	else if (unlikely(!(dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_REFERENCED)))
@@ -703,61 +756,12 @@ void d_mark_dontcache(struct inode *inode)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(d_mark_dontcache);
 
-/*
- * Finish off a dentry we've decided to kill.
- * dentry->d_lock must be held, returns with it unlocked.
- * Returns dentry requiring refcount drop, or NULL if we're done.
- */
-static struct dentry *dentry_kill(struct dentry *dentry)
-	__releases(dentry->d_lock)
-{
-	struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
-	struct dentry *parent = NULL;
-
-	if (inode && unlikely(!spin_trylock(&inode->i_lock)))
-		goto slow_positive;
-
-	if (!IS_ROOT(dentry)) {
-		parent = dentry->d_parent;
-		if (unlikely(!spin_trylock(&parent->d_lock))) {
-			parent = __lock_parent(dentry);
-			if (likely(inode || !dentry->d_inode))
-				goto got_locks;
-			/* negative that became positive */
-			if (parent)
-				spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
-			inode = dentry->d_inode;
-			goto slow_positive;
-		}
-	}
-	__dentry_kill(dentry);
-	return parent;
-
-slow_positive:
-	spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
-	spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
-	spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
-	parent = lock_parent(dentry);
-got_locks:
-	if (unlikely(dentry->d_lockref.count != 1)) {
-		dentry->d_lockref.count--;
-	} else if (likely(!retain_dentry(dentry))) {
-		__dentry_kill(dentry);
-		return parent;
-	}
-	/* we are keeping it, after all */
-	if (inode)
-		spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
-	if (parent)
-		spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
-	spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
-	return NULL;
-}
-
 /*
  * Try to do a lockless dput(), and return whether that was successful.
  *
  * If unsuccessful, we return false, having already taken the dentry lock.
+ * In that case refcount is guaranteed to be zero and we have already
+ * decided that it's not worth keeping around.
  *
  * The caller needs to hold the RCU read lock, so that the dentry is
  * guaranteed to stay around even if the refcount goes down to zero!
@@ -768,15 +772,7 @@ static inline bool fast_dput(struct dentry *dentry)
 	unsigned int d_flags;
 
 	/*
-	 * If we have a d_op->d_delete() operation, we sould not
-	 * let the dentry count go to zero, so use "put_or_lock".
-	 */
-	if (unlikely(dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_OP_DELETE))
-		return lockref_put_or_lock(&dentry->d_lockref);
-
-	/*
-	 * .. otherwise, we can try to just decrement the
-	 * lockref optimistically.
+	 * try to decrement the lockref optimistically.
 	 */
 	ret = lockref_put_return(&dentry->d_lockref);
 
@@ -787,12 +783,12 @@ static inline bool fast_dput(struct dentry *dentry)
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
 		spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
-		if (dentry->d_lockref.count > 1) {
-			dentry->d_lockref.count--;
+		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(dentry->d_lockref.count <= 0)) {
 			spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
 			return true;
 		}
-		return false;
+		dentry->d_lockref.count--;
+		goto locked;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -830,7 +826,7 @@ static inline bool fast_dput(struct dentry *dentry)
 	 */
 	smp_rmb();
 	d_flags = READ_ONCE(dentry->d_flags);
-	d_flags &= DCACHE_REFERENCED | DCACHE_LRU_LIST |
+	d_flags &= DCACHE_REFERENCED | DCACHE_LRU_LIST | DCACHE_OP_DELETE |
 			DCACHE_DISCONNECTED | DCACHE_DONTCACHE;
 
 	/* Nothing to do? Dropping the reference was all we needed? */
@@ -850,17 +846,11 @@ static inline bool fast_dput(struct dentry *dentry)
 	 * else could have killed it and marked it dead. Either way, we
 	 * don't need to do anything else.
 	 */
-	if (dentry->d_lockref.count) {
+locked:
+	if (dentry->d_lockref.count || retain_dentry(dentry)) {
 		spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
 		return true;
 	}
-
-	/*
-	 * Re-get the reference we optimistically dropped. We hold the
-	 * lock, and we just tested that it was zero, so we can just
-	 * set it to 1.
-	 */
-	dentry->d_lockref.count = 1;
 	return false;
 }
 
@@ -903,29 +893,29 @@ void dput(struct dentry *dentry)
 		}
 
 		/* Slow case: now with the dentry lock held */
-		rcu_read_unlock();
-
-		if (likely(retain_dentry(dentry))) {
+		if (likely(lock_for_kill(dentry))) {
+			struct dentry *parent = dentry->d_parent;
+			rcu_read_unlock();
+			__dentry_kill(dentry);
+			if (dentry == parent)
+				return;
+			dentry = parent;
+		} else {
+			rcu_read_unlock();
 			spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
 			return;
 		}
-
-		dentry = dentry_kill(dentry);
 	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(dput);
 
-static void __dput_to_list(struct dentry *dentry, struct list_head *list)
+static void to_shrink_list(struct dentry *dentry, struct list_head *list)
 __must_hold(&dentry->d_lock)
 {
-	if (dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_SHRINK_LIST) {
-		/* let the owner of the list it's on deal with it */
-		--dentry->d_lockref.count;
-	} else {
+	if (!(dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_SHRINK_LIST)) {
 		if (dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_LRU_LIST)
 			d_lru_del(dentry);
-		if (!--dentry->d_lockref.count)
-			d_shrink_add(dentry, list);
+		d_shrink_add(dentry, list);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -937,8 +927,7 @@ void dput_to_list(struct dentry *dentry, struct list_head *list)
 		return;
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();
-	if (!retain_dentry(dentry))
-		__dput_to_list(dentry, list);
+	to_shrink_list(dentry, list);
 	spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
 }
 
@@ -1117,58 +1106,6 @@ void d_prune_aliases(struct inode *inode)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(d_prune_aliases);
 
-/*
- * Lock a dentry from shrink list.
- * Called under rcu_read_lock() and dentry->d_lock; the former
- * guarantees that nothing we access will be freed under us.
- * Note that dentry is *not* protected from concurrent dentry_kill(),
- * d_delete(), etc.
- *
- * Return false if dentry has been disrupted or grabbed, leaving
- * the caller to kick it off-list.  Otherwise, return true and have
- * that dentry's inode and parent both locked.
- */
-static bool shrink_lock_dentry(struct dentry *dentry)
-{
-	struct inode *inode;
-	struct dentry *parent;
-
-	if (dentry->d_lockref.count)
-		return false;
-
-	inode = dentry->d_inode;
-	if (inode && unlikely(!spin_trylock(&inode->i_lock))) {
-		spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
-		spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
-		spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
-		if (unlikely(dentry->d_lockref.count))
-			goto out;
-		/* changed inode means that somebody had grabbed it */
-		if (unlikely(inode != dentry->d_inode))
-			goto out;
-	}
-
-	parent = dentry->d_parent;
-	if (IS_ROOT(dentry) || likely(spin_trylock(&parent->d_lock)))
-		return true;
-
-	spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
-	spin_lock(&parent->d_lock);
-	if (unlikely(parent != dentry->d_parent)) {
-		spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
-		spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
-		goto out;
-	}
-	spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
-	if (likely(!dentry->d_lockref.count))
-		return true;
-	spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
-out:
-	if (inode)
-		spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
-	return false;
-}
-
 void shrink_dentry_list(struct list_head *list)
 {
 	while (!list_empty(list)) {
@@ -1177,12 +1114,11 @@ void shrink_dentry_list(struct list_head *list)
 		dentry = list_entry(list->prev, struct dentry, d_lru);
 		spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
 		rcu_read_lock();
-		if (!shrink_lock_dentry(dentry)) {
+		if (!lock_for_kill(dentry)) {
 			bool can_free = false;
 			rcu_read_unlock();
 			d_shrink_del(dentry);
-			if (dentry->d_lockref.count < 0)
-				can_free = dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_MAY_FREE;
+			can_free = dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_MAY_FREE;
 			spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
 			if (can_free)
 				dentry_free(dentry);
@@ -1191,8 +1127,8 @@ void shrink_dentry_list(struct list_head *list)
 		rcu_read_unlock();
 		d_shrink_del(dentry);
 		parent = dentry->d_parent;
-		if (parent != dentry)
-			__dput_to_list(parent, list);
+		if (parent != dentry && !--parent->d_lockref.count)
+			to_shrink_list(parent, list);
 		__dentry_kill(dentry);
 	}
 }
@@ -1632,14 +1568,15 @@ void shrink_dcache_parent(struct dentry *parent)
 		if (data.victim) {
 			struct dentry *parent;
 			spin_lock(&data.victim->d_lock);
-			if (!shrink_lock_dentry(data.victim)) {
+			if (!lock_for_kill(data.victim)) {
 				spin_unlock(&data.victim->d_lock);
 				rcu_read_unlock();
 			} else {
 				rcu_read_unlock();
 				parent = data.victim->d_parent;
-				if (parent != data.victim)
-					__dput_to_list(parent, &data.dispose);
+				if (parent != data.victim &&
+				    !--parent->d_lockref.count)
+					to_shrink_list(parent, &data.dispose);
 				__dentry_kill(data.victim);
 			}
 		}

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-31  6:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 119+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-30  0:37 [RFC] simplifying fast_dput(), dentry_kill() et.al Al Viro
2023-10-30 21:53 ` Al Viro
2023-10-30 22:18   ` Linus Torvalds
2023-10-31  0:18     ` Al Viro
2023-10-31  1:53       ` Al Viro
2023-10-31  6:12         ` Al Viro [this message]
2023-11-01  6:18           ` Al Viro
2023-11-01  6:20           ` [PATCH 01/15] fast_dput(): having ->d_delete() is not reason to delay refcount decrement Al Viro
2023-11-01  6:20             ` [PATCH 02/15] fast_dput(): handle underflows gracefully Al Viro
2023-11-01  6:20             ` [PATCH 03/15] fast_dput(): new rules for refcount Al Viro
2023-11-01  6:20             ` [PATCH 04/15] __dput_to_list(): do decrement of refcount in the caller Al Viro
2023-11-01  6:20             ` [PATCH 05/15] retain_dentry(): lift decrement of ->d_count into callers Al Viro
2023-11-01  6:20             ` [PATCH 06/15] __dentry_kill(): get consistent rules for ->d_count Al Viro
2023-11-01  6:20             ` [PATCH 07/15] dentry_kill(): don't bother with retain_dentry() on slow path Al Viro
2023-11-01  6:20             ` [PATCH 08/15] Call retain_dentry() with refcount 0 Al Viro
2023-11-01  6:20             ` [PATCH 09/15] fold the call of retain_dentry() into fast_dput() Al Viro
2023-11-01  8:45               ` Al Viro
2023-11-01 17:30                 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-11-01 18:19                   ` Al Viro
2023-11-10  4:20                     ` lockless case of retain_dentry() (was Re: [PATCH 09/15] fold the call of retain_dentry() into fast_dput()) Al Viro
2023-11-10  5:57                       ` Linus Torvalds
2023-11-10  6:22                         ` Linus Torvalds
2023-11-22  6:29                           ` Guo Ren
2023-11-10  8:19                         ` Al Viro
2023-11-22  7:19                         ` Guo Ren
2023-11-22 17:20                           ` Linus Torvalds
2023-11-22 17:52                             ` Linus Torvalds
2023-11-22 18:05                               ` Linus Torvalds
2023-11-22 19:11                               ` Linus Torvalds
2023-11-29  7:14                                 ` Guo Ren
2023-11-29 12:25                                 ` Guo Ren
2023-11-29 14:42                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2023-11-26 16:39                             ` Guo Ren
2023-11-26 16:51                               ` Linus Torvalds
2023-11-30 10:00                                 ` Guo Ren
2023-12-01  1:09                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2023-12-01  3:36                                     ` Guo Ren
2023-12-01  5:15                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2023-12-01  7:31                                         ` Guo Ren
2023-11-26 16:51                               ` Guo Ren
2023-11-26 17:06                               ` Linus Torvalds
2023-11-26 17:59                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-11-29  9:52                                 ` Guo Ren
2023-11-01  6:20             ` [PATCH 10/15] don't try to cut corners in shrink_lock_dentry() Al Viro
2023-11-01  6:21             ` [PATCH 11/15] fold dentry_kill() into dput() Al Viro
2023-11-01  6:21             ` [PATCH 12/15] get rid of __dget() Al Viro
2023-11-01  6:21             ` [PATCH 13/15] shrink_dentry_list(): no need to check that dentry refcount is marked dead Al Viro
2023-11-01  6:21             ` [PATCH 14/15] to_shrink_list(): call only if refcount is 0 Al Viro
2023-11-01  6:21             ` [PATCH 15/15] switch select_collect{,2}() to use of to_shrink_list() Al Viro
2023-11-01  2:22       ` [RFC] simplifying fast_dput(), dentry_kill() et.al Al Viro
2023-11-01 14:29         ` Benjamin Coddington
2023-11-05 19:54       ` Al Viro
2023-11-05 21:59         ` Al Viro
2023-11-06  5:53         ` Al Viro
2023-11-07  2:08           ` Al Viro
2023-11-09  6:19             ` [RFC][PATCHSET v2] " Al Viro
2023-11-09  6:20               ` [PATCH 01/22] struct dentry: get rid of randomize_layout idiocy Al Viro
2023-11-09  6:20                 ` [PATCH 02/22] switch nfsd_client_rmdir() to use of simple_recursive_removal() Al Viro
2023-11-09 13:42                   ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-09 14:01                   ` Chuck Lever
2023-11-09 18:47                     ` Al Viro
2023-11-09 18:50                       ` Chuck Lever III
2023-11-09  6:20                 ` [PATCH 03/22] coda_flag_children(): cope with dentries turning negative Al Viro
2023-11-09 13:43                   ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-09  6:20                 ` [PATCH 04/22] dentry: switch the lists of children to hlist Al Viro
2023-11-09 13:48                   ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-09 19:32                     ` Al Viro
2023-11-09  6:20                 ` [PATCH 05/22] centralize killing dentry from shrink list Al Viro
2023-11-09 13:49                   ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-09  6:20                 ` [PATCH 06/22] get rid of __dget() Al Viro
2023-11-09 13:50                   ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-09  6:20                 ` [PATCH 07/22] shrink_dentry_list(): no need to check that dentry refcount is marked dead Al Viro
2023-11-09 13:53                   ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-09 20:28                     ` Al Viro
2023-11-09  6:20                 ` [PATCH 08/22] fast_dput(): having ->d_delete() is not reason to delay refcount decrement Al Viro
2023-11-09 13:58                   ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-09  6:20                 ` [PATCH 09/22] fast_dput(): handle underflows gracefully Al Viro
2023-11-09 14:46                   ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-09 20:39                     ` Al Viro
2023-11-09  6:20                 ` [PATCH 10/22] fast_dput(): new rules for refcount Al Viro
2023-11-09 14:54                   ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-09 20:52                     ` Al Viro
2023-11-09  6:20                 ` [PATCH 11/22] __dput_to_list(): do decrement of refcount in the callers Al Viro
2023-11-09 15:21                   ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-09  6:20                 ` [PATCH 12/22] Make retain_dentry() neutral with respect to refcounting Al Viro
2023-11-09 15:22                   ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-09  6:20                 ` [PATCH 13/22] __dentry_kill(): get consistent rules for victim's refcount Al Viro
2023-11-09 15:27                   ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-09  6:20                 ` [PATCH 14/22] dentry_kill(): don't bother with retain_dentry() on slow path Al Viro
2023-11-09 15:53                   ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-09 21:29                     ` Al Viro
2023-11-09  6:20                 ` [PATCH 15/22] Call retain_dentry() with refcount 0 Al Viro
2023-11-09 16:09                   ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-09  6:20                 ` [PATCH 16/22] fold the call of retain_dentry() into fast_dput() Al Viro
2023-11-09 16:17                   ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-09  6:20                 ` [PATCH 17/22] don't try to cut corners in shrink_lock_dentry() Al Viro
2023-11-09 17:20                   ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-09 21:45                     ` Al Viro
2023-11-10  9:07                       ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-09 17:39                   ` Linus Torvalds
2023-11-09 18:11                     ` Linus Torvalds
2023-11-09 18:20                     ` Al Viro
2023-11-09  6:20                 ` [PATCH 18/22] fold dentry_kill() into dput() Al Viro
2023-11-09 17:22                   ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-09  6:20                 ` [PATCH 19/22] to_shrink_list(): call only if refcount is 0 Al Viro
2023-11-09 17:29                   ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-09  6:20                 ` [PATCH 20/22] switch select_collect{,2}() to use of to_shrink_list() Al Viro
2023-11-09 17:31                   ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-09  6:20                 ` [PATCH 21/22] d_prune_aliases(): use a shrink list Al Viro
2023-11-09 17:33                   ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-09  6:20                 ` [PATCH 22/22] __dentry_kill(): new locking scheme Al Viro
2023-11-10 13:34                   ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-09 13:33                 ` [PATCH 01/22] struct dentry: get rid of randomize_layout idiocy Christian Brauner
2023-10-31  2:25     ` [RFC] simplifying fast_dput(), dentry_kill() et.al Gao Xiang
2023-10-31  2:29       ` Gao Xiang
2023-10-31  3:02       ` Linus Torvalds
2023-10-31  3:13         ` Gao Xiang
2023-10-31  3:26         ` Al Viro
2023-10-31  3:41           ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231031061226.GC1957730@ZenIV \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).