From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADAFD2031D for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2023 17:12:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=none Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EF3983; Tue, 31 Oct 2023 10:12:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 3654A67373; Tue, 31 Oct 2023 18:12:31 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 18:12:30 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Chandan Babu R , catherine.hoang@oracle.com, cheng.lin130@zte.com.cn, dan.j.williams@intel.com, dchinner@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, osandov@fb.com, ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfs-linux: for-next updated to 22c2699cb068 Message-ID: <20231031171230.GA31580@lst.de> References: <87fs1s3bk6.fsf@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64> <20231031090242.GA25889@lst.de> <20231031164359.GA1041814@frogsfrogsfrogs> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231031164359.GA1041814@frogsfrogsfrogs> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 09:43:59AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > If by 'big stuff' you mean the MF_MEM_PRE_REMOVE patch, then yes, I > agree that it's too late to be changing code outside xfs. Bumping that > to 6.8 will disappoint Shiyang, regrettably. > > The patchsets for realtime units refactoring and typechecked rt-helpers > (except for the xfs_rtalloc_args thing) I'd prefer to land in 6.7 for a > few reasons. First, the blast radii are contained to the rtalloc > subsystem of xfs. Second, I've been testing them for nearly a year now, > I think they're ready from a QA perspective. I mean both of them. And yes, I was hoping to see the RT work in 6.7 as well, but for that it needs to be in linux-next before the release of 6.6.