linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Chandan Babu R <chandanbabu@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, axboe@kernel.dk,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, dchinner@fromorbit.com
Subject: Re: [BUG REPORT] next-20231102: generic/311 fails on XFS with external log
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 09:35:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231103-igelstachel-signal-2503859a730a@brauner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231103081405.GC16854@lst.de>

On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 09:14:05AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 03:54:48PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > So you'll see EBUSY because the superblock was already frozen when the
> > main block device was frozen. I was somewhat expecting that we may run
> > into such issues.
> > 
> > I think we just need to figure out what we want to do in cases the
> > superblock is frozen via multiple devices. It would probably be correct
> > to keep it frozen as long as any of the devices is frozen?
> 
> As dave pointed out I think we need to bring back / keep the freeze
> count.

The freeze count never want away. IOW, for each block device we still
have bd_fsfreeze_count otherwise we couldn't nest per-block device. What
we need is a freeze counter in sb_writers so we can nest superblock
freezes. IOW, we need to count the number of block devices that
requested/caused the superblock to be frozen. I think we're all in
agreement though. All of our suggestions should be the same.
I'm currently testing:

From c1849037227e5801f0b5e8acfa05aa5d90f4c9e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 08:38:49 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [DRAFT] fs: handle freezing from multiple devices

Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
---
 fs/super.c         | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 include/linux/fs.h |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
index 176c55abd9de..882c79366c70 100644
--- a/fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/super.c
@@ -1476,9 +1476,11 @@ static int fs_bdev_freeze(struct block_device *bdev)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (sb->s_op->freeze_super)
-		error = sb->s_op->freeze_super(sb, FREEZE_HOLDER_USERSPACE);
+		error = sb->s_op->freeze_super(sb,
+				FREEZE_HOLDER_BLOCK | FREEZE_HOLDER_USERSPACE);
 	else
-		error = freeze_super(sb, FREEZE_HOLDER_USERSPACE);
+		error = freeze_super(sb,
+				FREEZE_HOLDER_BLOCK | FREEZE_HOLDER_USERSPACE);
 	if (!error)
 		error = sync_blockdev(bdev);
 	deactivate_super(sb);
@@ -1497,9 +1499,11 @@ static int fs_bdev_thaw(struct block_device *bdev)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (sb->s_op->thaw_super)
-		error = sb->s_op->thaw_super(sb, FREEZE_HOLDER_USERSPACE);
+		error = sb->s_op->thaw_super(sb,
+				FREEZE_HOLDER_BLOCK | FREEZE_HOLDER_USERSPACE);
 	else
-		error = thaw_super(sb, FREEZE_HOLDER_USERSPACE);
+		error = thaw_super(sb,
+				FREEZE_HOLDER_BLOCK | FREEZE_HOLDER_USERSPACE);
 	deactivate_super(sb);
 	return error;
 }
@@ -1923,6 +1927,7 @@ static int wait_for_partially_frozen(struct super_block *sb)
  * @who should be:
  * * %FREEZE_HOLDER_USERSPACE if userspace wants to freeze the fs;
  * * %FREEZE_HOLDER_KERNEL if the kernel wants to freeze the fs.
+ * * %FREEZE_HOLDER_BLOCK if freeze originated from the block layer.
  *
  * The @who argument distinguishes between the kernel and userspace trying to
  * freeze the filesystem.  Although there cannot be multiple kernel freezes or
@@ -1958,18 +1963,33 @@ static int wait_for_partially_frozen(struct super_block *sb)
 int freeze_super(struct super_block *sb, enum freeze_holder who)
 {
 	int ret;
+	bool bdev_initiated;
 
 	if (!super_lock_excl(sb)) {
 		WARN_ON_ONCE("Dying superblock while freezing!");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 	atomic_inc(&sb->s_active);
+	bdev_initiated = (who & FREEZE_HOLDER_BLOCK);
+	who &= ~FREEZE_HOLDER_BLOCK;
 
 retry:
 	if (sb->s_writers.frozen == SB_FREEZE_COMPLETE) {
+		ret = -EBUSY;
+
+		/*
+		 * This is a freeze request from another block device
+		 * associated with the same superblock.
+		 */
+		if (bdev_initiated) {
+			sb->s_writers.bdev_count++;
+			pr_info("Freeze initiated from %d block devices\n", sb->s_writers.bdev_count);
+			ret = 0;
+		}
+
 		if (sb->s_writers.freeze_holders & who) {
 			deactivate_locked_super(sb);
-			return -EBUSY;
+			return ret;
 		}
 
 		WARN_ON(sb->s_writers.freeze_holders == 0);
@@ -2002,6 +2022,8 @@ int freeze_super(struct super_block *sb, enum freeze_holder who)
 		/* Nothing to do really... */
 		sb->s_writers.freeze_holders |= who;
 		sb->s_writers.frozen = SB_FREEZE_COMPLETE;
+		if (bdev_initiated)
+			sb->s_writers.bdev_count++;
 		wake_up_var(&sb->s_writers.frozen);
 		super_unlock_excl(sb);
 		return 0;
@@ -2052,6 +2074,8 @@ int freeze_super(struct super_block *sb, enum freeze_holder who)
 	 */
 	sb->s_writers.freeze_holders |= who;
 	sb->s_writers.frozen = SB_FREEZE_COMPLETE;
+	if (bdev_initiated)
+		sb->s_writers.bdev_count++;
 	wake_up_var(&sb->s_writers.frozen);
 	lockdep_sb_freeze_release(sb);
 	super_unlock_excl(sb);
@@ -2068,12 +2092,22 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(freeze_super);
 static int thaw_super_locked(struct super_block *sb, enum freeze_holder who)
 {
 	int error = -EINVAL;
+	bool bdev_initiated = (who & FREEZE_HOLDER_BLOCK);
+	who &= ~FREEZE_HOLDER_BLOCK;
 
 	if (sb->s_writers.frozen != SB_FREEZE_COMPLETE)
 		goto out_unlock;
 	if (!(sb->s_writers.freeze_holders & who))
 		goto out_unlock;
 
+	if (bdev_initiated)
+		sb->s_writers.bdev_count--;
+	if (sb->s_writers.bdev_count) {
+		pr_info("Filesystems held frozen by %d block devices\n", sb->s_writers.bdev_count);
+		error = 0;
+		goto out_unlock;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * Freeze is shared with someone else.  Release our hold and drop the
 	 * active ref that freeze_super assigned to the freezer.
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 63ff88d20e46..edc9c071c199 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1186,6 +1186,7 @@ enum {
 struct sb_writers {
 	unsigned short			frozen;		/* Is sb frozen? */
 	unsigned short			freeze_holders;	/* Who froze fs? */
+	int				bdev_count;
 	struct percpu_rw_semaphore	rw_sem[SB_FREEZE_LEVELS];
 };
 
@@ -2054,6 +2055,7 @@ extern loff_t vfs_dedupe_file_range_one(struct file *src_file, loff_t src_pos,
 enum freeze_holder {
 	FREEZE_HOLDER_KERNEL	= (1U << 0),
 	FREEZE_HOLDER_USERSPACE	= (1U << 1),
+	FREEZE_HOLDER_BLOCK	= (1U << 2),
 };
 
 struct super_operations {
-- 
2.34.1


  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-03  8:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-02 12:36 [BUG REPORT] next-20231102: generic/311 fails on XFS with external log Chandan Babu R
2023-11-02 14:54 ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-02 20:48   ` Dave Chinner
2023-11-03  8:14   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-03  8:35     ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2023-11-03 13:52 ` [PATCH] fs: handle freezing from multiple devices Christian Brauner
2023-11-03 14:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-03 15:10     ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-03 15:43       ` Jan Kara
2023-11-03 16:49         ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-06  7:21           ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-04 14:00 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Handle multi device freezing Christian Brauner
2023-11-06  8:21   ` Chandan Babu R
2023-11-04 14:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] fs: remove dead check Christian Brauner
2023-11-06  7:29   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-06 10:39   ` Jan Kara
2023-11-06 12:49   ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Handle multi device freezing Christian Brauner
2023-11-04 14:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] fs: handle freezing from multiple devices Christian Brauner
2023-11-06  7:30   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-06 11:30   ` Jan Kara
2023-11-06 12:44     ` Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231103-igelstachel-signal-2503859a730a@brauner \
    --to=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=chandanbabu@kernel.org \
    --cc=dchinner@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).