linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Chandan Babu R <chandanbabu@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] fs: handle freezing from multiple devices
Date: Fri,  3 Nov 2023 14:52:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231103-vfs-multi-device-freeze-v1-1-fe922b30bfb6@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bkccnwxc.fsf@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64>

Before [1] freezing a filesystems through the block layer only worked
for the main block device as the owning superblock of additional block
devices could not be found. Any filesystem that made use of multiple
block devices would only be freezable via it's main block device.

For example, consider xfs over device mapper with /dev/dm-0 as main
block device and /dev/dm-1 as external log device. Two freeze requests
before [1]:

(1) dmsetup suspend /dev/dm-0 on the main block device

    bdev_freeze(dm-0)
    -> dm-0->bd_fsfreeze_count++
    -> freeze_super(xfs-sb)

    The owning superblock is found and the filesystem gets frozen.
    Returns 0.

(2) dmsetup suspend /dev/dm-1 on the log device

    bdev_freeze(dm-1)
    -> dm-1->bd_fsfreeze_count++

    The owning superblock isn't found and only the block device freeze
    count is incremented. Returns 0.

Two freeze requests after [1]:

(1') dmsetup suspend /dev/dm-0 on the main block device

    bdev_freeze(dm-0)
    -> dm-0->bd_fsfreeze_count++
    -> freeze_super(xfs-sb)

    The owning superblock is found and the filesystem gets frozen.
    Returns 0.

(2') dmsetup suspend /dev/dm-1 on the log device

    bdev_freeze(dm-0)
    -> dm-0->bd_fsfreeze_count++
    -> freeze_super(xfs-sb)

    The owning superblock is found and the filesystem gets frozen.
    Returns -EBUSY.

When (2') is called we initiate a freeze from another block device of
the same superblock. So we increment the bd_fsfreeze_count for that
additional block device. But we now also find the owning superblock for
additional block devices and call freeze_super() again which reports
-EBUSY.

This can be reproduced through xfstests via:

    mkfs.xfs -f -m crc=1,reflink=1,rmapbt=1, -i sparse=1 -lsize=1g,logdev=/dev/nvme1n1p4 /dev/nvme1n1p3
    mkfs.xfs -f -m crc=1,reflink=1,rmapbt=1, -i sparse=1 -lsize=1g,logdev=/dev/nvme1n1p6 /dev/nvme1n1p5

    FSTYP=xfs
    export TEST_DEV=/dev/nvme1n1p3
    export TEST_DIR=/mnt/test
    export TEST_LOGDEV=/dev/nvme1n1p4
    export SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/nvme1n1p5
    export SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt/scratch
    export SCRATCH_LOGDEV=/dev/nvme1n1p6
    export USE_EXTERNAL=yes

    sudo ./check generic/311

Fix this by counting the number of block devices that requested the
filesystem to be frozen in @bdev_count in struct sb_writers and only
unfreeze once the @bdev_count hits zero. Survives fstests and blktests
and makes the reproducer succeed.

Reported-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanbabu@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/87bkccnwxc.fsf@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64
Fixes: [1]: bfac4176f2c4 ("bdev: implement freeze and thaw holder operations") # no backport needed
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
---
 fs/super.c         | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 include/linux/fs.h |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
index 176c55abd9de..c51eb669ed0b 100644
--- a/fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/super.c
@@ -1476,9 +1476,11 @@ static int fs_bdev_freeze(struct block_device *bdev)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (sb->s_op->freeze_super)
-		error = sb->s_op->freeze_super(sb, FREEZE_HOLDER_USERSPACE);
+		error = sb->s_op->freeze_super(sb,
+				FREEZE_HOLDER_BDEV | FREEZE_HOLDER_USERSPACE);
 	else
-		error = freeze_super(sb, FREEZE_HOLDER_USERSPACE);
+		error = freeze_super(sb,
+				FREEZE_HOLDER_BDEV | FREEZE_HOLDER_USERSPACE);
 	if (!error)
 		error = sync_blockdev(bdev);
 	deactivate_super(sb);
@@ -1497,9 +1499,11 @@ static int fs_bdev_thaw(struct block_device *bdev)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (sb->s_op->thaw_super)
-		error = sb->s_op->thaw_super(sb, FREEZE_HOLDER_USERSPACE);
+		error = sb->s_op->thaw_super(sb,
+				FREEZE_HOLDER_BDEV | FREEZE_HOLDER_USERSPACE);
 	else
-		error = thaw_super(sb, FREEZE_HOLDER_USERSPACE);
+		error = thaw_super(sb,
+				FREEZE_HOLDER_BDEV | FREEZE_HOLDER_USERSPACE);
 	deactivate_super(sb);
 	return error;
 }
@@ -1923,6 +1927,7 @@ static int wait_for_partially_frozen(struct super_block *sb)
  * @who should be:
  * * %FREEZE_HOLDER_USERSPACE if userspace wants to freeze the fs;
  * * %FREEZE_HOLDER_KERNEL if the kernel wants to freeze the fs.
+ * * %FREEZE_HOLDER_BDEV if freeze originated from a block device.
  *
  * The @who argument distinguishes between the kernel and userspace trying to
  * freeze the filesystem.  Although there cannot be multiple kernel freezes or
@@ -1930,6 +1935,12 @@ static int wait_for_partially_frozen(struct super_block *sb)
  * userspace can both hold a filesystem frozen.  The filesystem remains frozen
  * until there are no kernel or userspace freezes in effect.
  *
+ * A filesystem may hold multiple devices and thus a filesystems may be
+ * frozen through the block layer via multiple block devices. In this
+ * case the request is as originating from the block layer by raising
+ * %FREEZE_HOLDER_BDEV. We count the number of block devices that
+ * requested a freeze in @bdev_count.
+ *
  * During this function, sb->s_writers.frozen goes through these values:
  *
  * SB_UNFROZEN: File system is normal, all writes progress as usual.
@@ -1958,18 +1969,29 @@ static int wait_for_partially_frozen(struct super_block *sb)
 int freeze_super(struct super_block *sb, enum freeze_holder who)
 {
 	int ret;
+	bool bdev_initiated;
 
 	if (!super_lock_excl(sb)) {
 		WARN_ON_ONCE("Dying superblock while freezing!");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 	atomic_inc(&sb->s_active);
+	bdev_initiated = (who & FREEZE_HOLDER_BDEV);
+	who &= ~FREEZE_HOLDER_BDEV;
 
 retry:
 	if (sb->s_writers.frozen == SB_FREEZE_COMPLETE) {
+		ret = -EBUSY;
+
+		if (bdev_initiated) {
+			sb->s_writers.bdev_count++;
+			pr_info("VFS: Freeze initiated from %d block devices\n", sb->s_writers.bdev_count);
+			ret = 0;
+		}
+
 		if (sb->s_writers.freeze_holders & who) {
 			deactivate_locked_super(sb);
-			return -EBUSY;
+			return ret;
 		}
 
 		WARN_ON(sb->s_writers.freeze_holders == 0);
@@ -2002,6 +2024,8 @@ int freeze_super(struct super_block *sb, enum freeze_holder who)
 		/* Nothing to do really... */
 		sb->s_writers.freeze_holders |= who;
 		sb->s_writers.frozen = SB_FREEZE_COMPLETE;
+		if (bdev_initiated)
+			sb->s_writers.bdev_count++;
 		wake_up_var(&sb->s_writers.frozen);
 		super_unlock_excl(sb);
 		return 0;
@@ -2052,6 +2076,8 @@ int freeze_super(struct super_block *sb, enum freeze_holder who)
 	 */
 	sb->s_writers.freeze_holders |= who;
 	sb->s_writers.frozen = SB_FREEZE_COMPLETE;
+	if (bdev_initiated)
+		sb->s_writers.bdev_count++;
 	wake_up_var(&sb->s_writers.frozen);
 	lockdep_sb_freeze_release(sb);
 	super_unlock_excl(sb);
@@ -2068,12 +2094,22 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(freeze_super);
 static int thaw_super_locked(struct super_block *sb, enum freeze_holder who)
 {
 	int error = -EINVAL;
+	bool bdev_initiated = (who & FREEZE_HOLDER_BDEV);
+	who &= ~FREEZE_HOLDER_BDEV;
 
 	if (sb->s_writers.frozen != SB_FREEZE_COMPLETE)
 		goto out_unlock;
 	if (!(sb->s_writers.freeze_holders & who))
 		goto out_unlock;
 
+	if (bdev_initiated)
+		sb->s_writers.bdev_count--;
+	if (sb->s_writers.bdev_count) {
+		pr_info("VFS: Filesystems held frozen by %d block devices\n", sb->s_writers.bdev_count);
+		error = 0;
+		goto out_unlock;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * Freeze is shared with someone else.  Release our hold and drop the
 	 * active ref that freeze_super assigned to the freezer.
@@ -2098,6 +2134,8 @@ static int thaw_super_locked(struct super_block *sb, enum freeze_holder who)
 		if (error) {
 			printk(KERN_ERR "VFS:Filesystem thaw failed\n");
 			lockdep_sb_freeze_release(sb);
+			if (bdev_initiated)
+				sb->s_writers.bdev_count++;
 			goto out_unlock;
 		}
 	}
@@ -2126,6 +2164,13 @@ static int thaw_super_locked(struct super_block *sb, enum freeze_holder who)
  * @who should be:
  * * %FREEZE_HOLDER_USERSPACE if userspace wants to thaw the fs;
  * * %FREEZE_HOLDER_KERNEL if the kernel wants to thaw the fs.
+ * * %FREEZE_HOLDER_BDEV if freeze originated from a block device.
+ *
+ * A filesystem may hold multiple devices and thus a filesystems may
+ * have been frozen through the block layer via multiple block devices.
+ * In this case the number of block devices that requested the
+ * filesystem to be frozen is stored in @bdev_count. We only unfreeze if
+ * @bdev_count is zero
  */
 int thaw_super(struct super_block *sb, enum freeze_holder who)
 {
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 63ff88d20e46..dda7942e1f3e 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1186,6 +1186,7 @@ enum {
 struct sb_writers {
 	unsigned short			frozen;		/* Is sb frozen? */
 	unsigned short			freeze_holders;	/* Who froze fs? */
+	int				bdev_count;	/* How many devices froze it? */
 	struct percpu_rw_semaphore	rw_sem[SB_FREEZE_LEVELS];
 };
 
@@ -2054,6 +2055,7 @@ extern loff_t vfs_dedupe_file_range_one(struct file *src_file, loff_t src_pos,
 enum freeze_holder {
 	FREEZE_HOLDER_KERNEL	= (1U << 0),
 	FREEZE_HOLDER_USERSPACE	= (1U << 1),
+	FREEZE_HOLDER_BDEV	= (1U << 2),
 };
 
 struct super_operations {

---
base-commit: c6a4738de282fc95752e1f1c5573ab7b4020b55e
change-id: 20231103-vfs-multi-device-freeze-506e2c010473


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-11-03 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-02 12:36 [BUG REPORT] next-20231102: generic/311 fails on XFS with external log Chandan Babu R
2023-11-02 14:54 ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-02 20:48   ` Dave Chinner
2023-11-03  8:14   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-03  8:35     ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-03 13:52 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2023-11-03 14:19   ` [PATCH] fs: handle freezing from multiple devices Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-03 15:10     ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-03 15:43       ` Jan Kara
2023-11-03 16:49         ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-06  7:21           ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-04 14:00 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Handle multi device freezing Christian Brauner
2023-11-06  8:21   ` Chandan Babu R
2023-11-04 14:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] fs: remove dead check Christian Brauner
2023-11-06  7:29   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-06 10:39   ` Jan Kara
2023-11-06 12:49   ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Handle multi device freezing Christian Brauner
2023-11-04 14:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] fs: handle freezing from multiple devices Christian Brauner
2023-11-06  7:30   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-06 11:30   ` Jan Kara
2023-11-06 12:44     ` Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231103-vfs-multi-device-freeze-v1-1-fe922b30bfb6@kernel.org \
    --to=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=chandanbabu@kernel.org \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).