From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D16128DAD for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 14:50:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="rE7oATpe" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75B28C433C7; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 14:50:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1699282256; bh=PrPL5yxS0XHR88fAG6CPc6WPfIQAznLRMTKPqNE0Xjs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=rE7oATpe1ZgWfXcIoEEYTKuDO2oyjiZolXVeLIPumiw25dIWXVc3fhdbRCYyTsa1+ a3qHcvLQ3yPKfm9y4yFqhEYVmpUZMBlBgG8DrbKm/+JkGfs+eG+EClGCKFCl+bY0gt 2LSz4dlsQrVCCzaQBJXNcxW402GnJMy2GHaJNQX4+Xph7yOyHBVIa3yDcBlCiWhMf0 ajGM/77GJy0kUF3VP1S068yabBhLX0AG1XWKxx1UHBGLcEVMFEOMZ8DAVrEzb7zKWr 67LMJ6vwibIagt+HyiOeI+IJh6XgyCkX+emCBddz3rWw/43wTWtOz97ccPJgs19jFV wl4j8poomrivA== Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 15:50:46 +0100 From: Christian Brauner To: Ian Kent Cc: David Howells , Linus Torvalds , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bill O'Donnell Subject: Re: [GIT PULL for v6.7] autofs updates Message-ID: <20231106-aufleben-umfeld-25a2cd86e521@brauner> References: <20231027-vfs-autofs-018bbf11ed67@brauner> <43ea4439-8cb9-8b0d-5e04-3bd5e85530f4@themaw.net> <61f26d16-36e9-9a3c-ad08-9ed2c8baa748@themaw.net> <83a889bd-3f9e-edce-78ff-0afa01990197@themaw.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83a889bd-3f9e-edce-78ff-0afa01990197@themaw.net> > Christian, David's original conversion patch for devpts looks like it's > > still relevant, it also looks fairly small to the point that I'm wondering > > if it's worth breaking it down into smaller patches. I vaguely remember that patch and no, for simple fses like devpts breaking this into smaller chunks is probably not worth it. These conversions patches often aren't easy to split nicely anyway. > Would you be ok with me just doing a straight patch apply, detailed review > > and some testing before posting it? Sure.