linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] remap_range: move file_start_write() to after permission hook
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 16:10:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231121-datum-computer-93e188fe5469@brauner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231114153321.1716028-8-amir73il@gmail.com>

On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 05:33:13PM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> In vfs code, file_start_write() is usually called after the permission
> hook in rw_verify_area().  vfs_dedupe_file_range_one() is an exception
> to this rule.
> 
> In vfs_dedupe_file_range_one(), move file_start_write() to after the
> the rw_verify_area() checks to make them "start-write-safe".
> 
> This is needed for fanotify "pre content" events.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
> ---
>  fs/remap_range.c | 32 +++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/remap_range.c b/fs/remap_range.c
> index 42f79cb2b1b1..de4b09d0ba1d 100644
> --- a/fs/remap_range.c
> +++ b/fs/remap_range.c
> @@ -445,46 +445,40 @@ loff_t vfs_dedupe_file_range_one(struct file *src_file, loff_t src_pos,
>  	WARN_ON_ONCE(remap_flags & ~(REMAP_FILE_DEDUP |
>  				     REMAP_FILE_CAN_SHORTEN));
>  
> -	ret = mnt_want_write_file(dst_file);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * This is redundant if called from vfs_dedupe_file_range(), but other
>  	 * callers need it and it's not performance sesitive...
>  	 */
>  	ret = remap_verify_area(src_file, src_pos, len, false);
>  	if (ret)
> -		goto out_drop_write;
> +		return ret;
>  
>  	ret = remap_verify_area(dst_file, dst_pos, len, true);
>  	if (ret)
> -		goto out_drop_write;
> +		return ret;
>  
> -	ret = -EPERM;
>  	if (!allow_file_dedupe(dst_file))
> -		goto out_drop_write;
> +		return -EPERM;

So that check specifically should come after mnt_want_write_file()
because it calls inode_permission() which takes the mount's idmapping
into account. And before you hold mnt_want_write_file() the idmapping of
the mount can still change. Once you've gotten write access though we
tell the anyone trying to change the mount's write-relevant properties
to go away.

With your changes that check might succeed now but fail later. So please
move that check below mnt_want_write_file(). That shouldn't be a
problem.

Fwiw, for security_file_permission() it doesn't matter because the LSMs
don't care about DAC permission - at least not the ones that currently
implement the hook. I verified that years ago and just rechecked. If
they start caring - which I sincerely hope they don't - then we have to
do a bunch of rework anyway to make that work reliably. But I doubt
that'll happen or we'll let that happen.

While at it, please rename allow_file_dedupe() to may_dedupe_file() so
it mirrors our helpers in fs/namei.c.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-21 15:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-14 15:33 [PATCH 00/15] Tidy up file permission hooks Amir Goldstein
2023-11-14 15:33 ` [PATCH 01/15] ovl: add permission hooks outside of do_splice_direct() Amir Goldstein
2023-11-14 15:33 ` [PATCH 02/15] splice: remove permission hook from do_splice_direct() Amir Goldstein
2023-11-14 15:33 ` [PATCH 03/15] splice: move permission hook out of splice_direct_to_actor() Amir Goldstein
2023-11-14 15:33 ` [PATCH 04/15] splice: move permission hook out of splice_file_to_pipe() Amir Goldstein
2023-11-14 15:33 ` [PATCH 05/15] splice: remove permission hook from iter_file_splice_write() Amir Goldstein
2023-11-21 14:56   ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-21 15:18     ` Amir Goldstein
2023-11-14 15:33 ` [PATCH 06/15] remap_range: move permission hooks out of do_clone_file_range() Amir Goldstein
2023-11-14 15:33 ` [PATCH 07/15] remap_range: move file_start_write() to after permission hook Amir Goldstein
2023-11-21 15:10   ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2023-11-21 15:47     ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-21 18:39     ` Amir Goldstein
2023-11-14 15:33 ` [PATCH 08/15] btrfs: " Amir Goldstein
2023-11-14 15:33 ` [PATCH 09/15] fs: move file_start_write() into vfs_iter_write() Amir Goldstein
2023-11-14 15:33 ` [PATCH 10/15] fs: move permission hook out of do_iter_write() Amir Goldstein
2023-11-21 15:34   ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-14 15:33 ` [PATCH 11/15] fs: move permission hook out of do_iter_read() Amir Goldstein
2023-11-21 15:28   ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-21 17:46     ` Amir Goldstein
2023-11-21 15:35   ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-14 15:33 ` [PATCH 12/15] fs: move kiocb_start_write() into vfs_iocb_iter_write() Amir Goldstein
2023-11-14 15:33 ` [PATCH 13/15] fs: create __sb_write_started() helper Amir Goldstein
2023-11-14 15:33 ` [PATCH 14/15] fs: create file_write_started() helper Amir Goldstein
2023-11-14 15:33 ` [PATCH 15/15] fs: create {sb,file}_write_not_started() helpers Amir Goldstein

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231121-datum-computer-93e188fe5469@brauner \
    --to=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).