From: Hyesoo Yu <hyesoo.yu@samsung.com>
To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
maz@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
yuzenghui@huawei.com, arnd@arndb.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com, mhiramat@kernel.org,
rppt@kernel.org, hughd@google.com, pcc@google.com,
steven.price@arm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, david@redhat.com, eugenis@google.com,
kcc@google.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 11/27] arm64: mte: Reserve tag storage memory
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 17:44:24 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231129084424.GA2988384@tiffany> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231119165721.9849-12-alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 13238 bytes --]
Hello.
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 04:57:05PM +0000, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> Allow the kernel to get the size and location of the MTE tag storage
> regions from the DTB. This memory is marked as reserved for now.
>
> The DTB node for the tag storage region is defined as:
>
> tags0: tag-storage@8f8000000 {
> compatible = "arm,mte-tag-storage";
> reg = <0x08 0xf8000000 0x00 0x4000000>;
> block-size = <0x1000>;
> memory = <&memory0>; // Associated tagged memory node
> };
>
How about using compatible = "shared-dma-pool" like below ?
&reserved_memory {
tags0: tag0@8f8000000 {
compatible = "arm,mte-tag-storage";
reg = <0x08 0xf8000000 0x00 0x4000000>;
};
}
tag-storage {
compatible = "arm,mte-tag-storage";
memory-region = <&tag>;
memory = <&memory0>;
block-size = <0x1000>;
}
And then, the activation of CMA would be performed in the CMA code.
We just can get the region information from memory-region and allocate it directly
like alloc_contig_range, take_page_off_buddy. It seems like we can remove a lots of code.
> The tag storage region represents the largest contiguous memory region that
> holds all the tags for the associated contiguous memory region which can be
> tagged. For example, for a 32GB contiguous tagged memory the corresponding
> tag storage region is 1GB of contiguous memory, not two adjacent 512M of
> tag storage memory.
>
> "block-size" represents the minimum multiple of 4K of tag storage where all
> the tags stored in the block correspond to a contiguous memory region. This
> is needed for platforms where the memory controller interleaves tag writes
> to memory. For example, if the memory controller interleaves tag writes for
> 256KB of contiguous memory across 8K of tag storage (2-way interleave),
> then the correct value for "block-size" is 0x2000. This value is a hardware
> property, independent of the selected kernel page size.
>
Is it considered for kernel page size like 16K page, 64K page ? The comment says
it should be a multiple of 4K, but it should be a multiple of the "page size" more accurately.
Please let me know if there's anything I misunderstood. :-)
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 12 ++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/mte_tag_storage.h | 15 ++
> arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/arm64/kernel/mte_tag_storage.c | 256 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 7 +
> 5 files changed, 291 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/mte_tag_storage.h
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/mte_tag_storage.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index 7b071a00425d..fe8276fdc7a8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -2062,6 +2062,18 @@ config ARM64_MTE
>
> Documentation/arch/arm64/memory-tagging-extension.rst.
>
> +if ARM64_MTE
> +config ARM64_MTE_TAG_STORAGE
> + bool "Dynamic MTE tag storage management"
> + help
> + Adds support for dynamic management of the memory used by the hardware
> + for storing MTE tags. This memory, unlike normal memory, cannot be
> + tagged. When it is used to store tags for another memory location it
> + cannot be used for any type of allocation.
> +
> + If unsure, say N
> +endif # ARM64_MTE
> +
> endmenu # "ARMv8.5 architectural features"
>
> menu "ARMv8.7 architectural features"
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mte_tag_storage.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mte_tag_storage.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..8f86c4f9a7c3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mte_tag_storage.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2023 ARM Ltd.
> + */
> +#ifndef __ASM_MTE_TAG_STORAGE_H
> +#define __ASM_MTE_TAG_STORAGE_H
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_MTE_TAG_STORAGE
> +void mte_tag_storage_init(void);
> +#else
> +static inline void mte_tag_storage_init(void)
> +{
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_MTE_TAG_STORAGE */
> +#endif /* __ASM_MTE_TAG_STORAGE_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
> index d95b3d6b471a..5f031bf9f8f1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CRASH_CORE) += crash_core.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_SDE_INTERFACE) += sdei.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH) += pointer_auth.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64_MTE) += mte.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64_MTE_TAG_STORAGE) += mte_tag_storage.o
> obj-y += vdso-wrap.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO) += vdso32-wrap.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_UNWIND_PATCH_PAC_INTO_SCS) += patch-scs.o
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/mte_tag_storage.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/mte_tag_storage.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..fa6267ef8392
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/mte_tag_storage.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,256 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * Support for dynamic tag storage.
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2023 ARM Ltd.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/memblock.h>
> +#include <linux/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/of_fdt.h>
> +#include <linux/range.h>
> +#include <linux/string.h>
> +#include <linux/xarray.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/mte_tag_storage.h>
> +
> +struct tag_region {
> + struct range mem_range; /* Memory associated with the tag storage, in PFNs. */
> + struct range tag_range; /* Tag storage memory, in PFNs. */
> + u32 block_size; /* Tag block size, in pages. */
> +};
> +
> +#define MAX_TAG_REGIONS 32
> +
> +static struct tag_region tag_regions[MAX_TAG_REGIONS];
> +static int num_tag_regions;
> +
> +static int __init tag_storage_of_flat_get_range(unsigned long node, const __be32 *reg,
> + int reg_len, struct range *range)
> +{
> + int addr_cells = dt_root_addr_cells;
> + int size_cells = dt_root_size_cells;
> + u64 size;
> +
> + if (reg_len / 4 > addr_cells + size_cells)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + range->start = PHYS_PFN(of_read_number(reg, addr_cells));
> + size = PHYS_PFN(of_read_number(reg + addr_cells, size_cells));
> + if (size == 0) {
> + pr_err("Invalid node");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + range->end = range->start + size - 1;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __init tag_storage_of_flat_get_tag_range(unsigned long node,
> + struct range *tag_range)
> +{
> + const __be32 *reg;
> + int reg_len;
> +
> + reg = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "reg", ®_len);
> + if (reg == NULL) {
> + pr_err("Invalid metadata node");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return tag_storage_of_flat_get_range(node, reg, reg_len, tag_range);
> +}
> +
> +static int __init tag_storage_of_flat_get_memory_range(unsigned long node, struct range *mem)
> +{
> + const __be32 *reg;
> + int reg_len;
> +
> + reg = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "linux,usable-memory", ®_len);
> + if (reg == NULL)
> + reg = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "reg", ®_len);
> +
> + if (reg == NULL) {
> + pr_err("Invalid memory node");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return tag_storage_of_flat_get_range(node, reg, reg_len, mem);
> +}
> +
> +struct find_memory_node_arg {
> + unsigned long node;
> + u32 phandle;
> +};
> +
> +static int __init fdt_find_memory_node(unsigned long node, const char *uname,
> + int depth, void *data)
> +{
> + const char *type = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "device_type", NULL);
> + struct find_memory_node_arg *arg = data;
> +
> + if (depth != 1 || !type || strcmp(type, "memory") != 0)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (of_get_flat_dt_phandle(node) == arg->phandle) {
> + arg->node = node;
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __init tag_storage_get_memory_node(unsigned long tag_node, unsigned long *mem_node)
> +{
> + struct find_memory_node_arg arg = { 0 };
> + const __be32 *memory_prop;
> + u32 mem_phandle;
> + int ret, reg_len;
> +
> + memory_prop = of_get_flat_dt_prop(tag_node, "memory", ®_len);
> + if (!memory_prop) {
> + pr_err("Missing 'memory' property in the tag storage node");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + mem_phandle = be32_to_cpup(memory_prop);
> + arg.phandle = mem_phandle;
> +
> + ret = of_scan_flat_dt(fdt_find_memory_node, &arg);
> + if (ret != 1) {
> + pr_err("Associated memory node not found");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + *mem_node = arg.node;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __init tag_storage_of_flat_read_u32(unsigned long node, const char *propname,
> + u32 *retval)
> +{
> + const __be32 *reg;
> +
> + reg = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, propname, NULL);
> + if (!reg)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + *retval = be32_to_cpup(reg);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static u32 __init get_block_size_pages(u32 block_size_bytes)
> +{
> + u32 a = PAGE_SIZE;
> + u32 b = block_size_bytes;
> + u32 r;
> +
> + /* Find greatest common divisor using the Euclidian algorithm. */
> + do {
> + r = a % b;
> + a = b;
> + b = r;
> + } while (b != 0);
> +
> + return PHYS_PFN(PAGE_SIZE * block_size_bytes / a);
> +}
> +
> +static int __init fdt_init_tag_storage(unsigned long node, const char *uname,
> + int depth, void *data)
> +{
> + struct tag_region *region;
> + unsigned long mem_node;
> + struct range *mem_range;
> + struct range *tag_range;
> + u32 block_size_bytes;
> + u32 nid = 0;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (depth != 1 || !strstr(uname, "tag-storage"))
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (!of_flat_dt_is_compatible(node, "arm,mte-tag-storage"))
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (num_tag_regions == MAX_TAG_REGIONS) {
> + pr_err("Maximum number of tag storage regions exceeded");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + region = &tag_regions[num_tag_regions];
> + mem_range = ®ion->mem_range;
> + tag_range = ®ion->tag_range;
> +
> + ret = tag_storage_of_flat_get_tag_range(node, tag_range);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("Invalid tag storage node");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = tag_storage_get_memory_node(node, &mem_node);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = tag_storage_of_flat_get_memory_range(mem_node, mem_range);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("Invalid address for associated data memory node");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + /* The tag region must exactly match the corresponding memory. */
> + if (range_len(tag_range) * 32 != range_len(mem_range)) {
> + pr_err("Tag storage region 0x%llx-0x%llx does not cover the memory region 0x%llx-0x%llx",
> + PFN_PHYS(tag_range->start), PFN_PHYS(tag_range->end),
> + PFN_PHYS(mem_range->start), PFN_PHYS(mem_range->end));
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + ret = tag_storage_of_flat_read_u32(node, "block-size", &block_size_bytes);
> + if (ret || block_size_bytes == 0) {
> + pr_err("Invalid or missing 'block-size' property");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + region->block_size = get_block_size_pages(block_size_bytes);
> + if (range_len(tag_range) % region->block_size != 0) {
> + pr_err("Tag storage region size 0x%llx is not a multiple of block size %u",
> + PFN_PHYS(range_len(tag_range)), region->block_size);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
I was confused about the variable "block_size", The block size declared in the device tree is
in bytes, but the actual block size used is in pages. I think the term "block_size" can cause
confusion as it might be interpreted as bytes. If possible, I suggest changing the term "block_size"
to something more readable, such as "block_nr_pages" (This is just a example!)
Thanks,
Regards.
> + ret = tag_storage_of_flat_read_u32(mem_node, "numa-node-id", &nid);
> + if (ret)
> + nid = numa_node_id();
> +
> + ret = memblock_add_node(PFN_PHYS(tag_range->start), PFN_PHYS(range_len(tag_range)),
> + nid, MEMBLOCK_NONE);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("Error adding tag memblock (%d)", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + memblock_reserve(PFN_PHYS(tag_range->start), PFN_PHYS(range_len(tag_range)));
> +
> + pr_info("Found tag storage region 0x%llx-0x%llx, block size %u pages",
> + PFN_PHYS(tag_range->start), PFN_PHYS(tag_range->end), region->block_size);
> +
> + num_tag_regions++;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void __init mte_tag_storage_init(void)
> +{
> + struct range *tag_range;
> + int i, ret;
> +
> + ret = of_scan_flat_dt(fdt_init_tag_storage, NULL);
> + if (ret) {
> + for (i = 0; i < num_tag_regions; i++) {
> + tag_range = &tag_regions[i].tag_range;
> + memblock_remove(PFN_PHYS(tag_range->start), PFN_PHYS(range_len(tag_range)));
> + }
> + num_tag_regions = 0;
> + pr_info("MTE tag storage region management disabled");
> + }
> +}
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> index 417a8a86b2db..1b77138c1aa5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
> #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
> #include <asm/cpu_ops.h>
> #include <asm/kasan.h>
> +#include <asm/mte_tag_storage.h>
> #include <asm/numa.h>
> #include <asm/scs.h>
> #include <asm/sections.h>
> @@ -342,6 +343,12 @@ void __init __no_sanitize_address setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
> FW_BUG "Booted with MMU enabled!");
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Must be called before memory limits are enforced by
> + * arm64_memblock_init().
> + */
> + mte_tag_storage_init();
> +
> arm64_memblock_init();
>
> paging_init();
> --
> 2.42.1
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-29 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-19 16:56 [PATCH RFC v2 00/27] Add support for arm64 MTE dynamic tag storage reuse Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-19 16:56 ` [PATCH RFC v2 01/27] arm64: mte: Rework naming for tag manipulation functions Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-19 16:56 ` [PATCH RFC v2 02/27] arm64: mte: Rename __GFP_ZEROTAGS to __GFP_TAGGED Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-19 16:56 ` [PATCH RFC v2 03/27] mm: cma: Make CMA_ALLOC_SUCCESS/FAIL count the number of pages Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-19 16:56 ` [PATCH RFC v2 04/27] mm: migrate/mempolicy: Add hook to modify migration target gfp Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-25 10:03 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-11-27 11:52 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-28 6:49 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-11-28 17:21 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-19 16:56 ` [PATCH RFC v2 05/27] mm: page_alloc: Add an arch hook to allow prep_new_page() to fail Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-24 19:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-27 12:09 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-28 16:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-28 17:17 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-19 16:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 06/27] mm: page_alloc: Allow an arch to hook early into free_pages_prepare() Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-24 19:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-27 13:03 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-28 16:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-28 17:17 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-19 16:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 07/27] mm: page_alloc: Add an arch hook to filter MIGRATE_CMA allocations Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-19 16:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 08/27] mm: page_alloc: Partially revert "mm: page_alloc: remove stale CMA guard code" Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-19 16:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 09/27] mm: Allow an arch to hook into folio allocation when VMA is known Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-19 16:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 10/27] mm: Call arch_swap_prepare_to_restore() before arch_swap_restore() Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-19 16:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 11/27] arm64: mte: Reserve tag storage memory Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-29 8:44 ` Hyesoo Yu [this message]
2023-11-30 11:56 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-12-03 12:14 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-12-08 5:03 ` Hyesoo Yu
2023-12-11 14:45 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-12-11 17:29 ` Rob Herring
2023-12-12 16:38 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-12-12 18:44 ` Rob Herring
2023-12-13 13:04 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-12-13 14:06 ` Rob Herring
2023-12-13 14:51 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-12-13 17:22 ` Rob Herring
2023-12-13 17:44 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-12-13 20:30 ` Rob Herring
2023-12-14 15:45 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-12-14 18:55 ` Rob Herring
2023-12-18 10:59 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-19 16:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 12/27] arm64: mte: Add tag storage pages to the MIGRATE_CMA migratetype Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-24 19:40 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-27 15:01 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-28 17:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-29 10:44 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-19 16:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 13/27] arm64: mte: Make tag storage depend on ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-24 19:51 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-27 15:04 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-28 17:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-29 10:46 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-19 16:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 14/27] arm64: mte: Disable dynamic tag storage management if HW KASAN is enabled Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-24 19:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-27 15:07 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-28 17:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-19 16:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 15/27] arm64: mte: Check that tag storage blocks are in the same zone Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-24 19:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-27 15:10 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-29 8:57 ` Hyesoo Yu
2023-11-30 12:00 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-12-08 5:27 ` Hyesoo Yu
2023-12-11 14:21 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-19 16:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 16/27] arm64: mte: Manage tag storage on page allocation Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-29 9:10 ` Hyesoo Yu
2023-11-29 13:33 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-12-08 5:29 ` Hyesoo Yu
2023-11-19 16:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 17/27] arm64: mte: Perform CMOs for tag blocks on tagged page allocation/free Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-19 16:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 18/27] arm64: mte: Reserve tag block for the zero page Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-28 17:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-29 11:30 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-29 13:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-29 13:41 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-19 16:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 19/27] mm: mprotect: Introduce PAGE_FAULT_ON_ACCESS for mprotect(PROT_MTE) Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-28 17:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-28 18:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-29 11:55 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-29 12:48 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-29 9:27 ` Hyesoo Yu
2023-11-30 12:06 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-30 12:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-30 13:32 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-30 13:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-30 14:33 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-30 14:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-19 16:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 20/27] mm: hugepage: Handle huge page fault on access Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-22 1:28 ` Peter Collingbourne
2023-11-22 9:22 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-28 17:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-29 11:56 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-19 16:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 21/27] mm: arm64: Handle tag storage pages mapped before mprotect(PROT_MTE) Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-28 5:39 ` Peter Collingbourne
2023-11-30 17:43 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-19 16:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 22/27] arm64: mte: swap: Handle tag restoring when missing tag storage Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-19 16:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 23/27] arm64: mte: copypage: " Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-19 16:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 24/27] arm64: mte: Handle fatal signal in reserve_tag_storage() Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-19 16:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 25/27] KVM: arm64: Disable MTE if tag storage is enabled Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-19 16:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 26/27] arm64: mte: Fast track reserving tag storage when the block is free Alexandru Elisei
2023-11-19 16:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 27/27] arm64: mte: Enable dynamic tag storage reuse Alexandru Elisei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231129084424.GA2988384@tiffany \
--to=hyesoo.yu@samsung.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=eugenis@google.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kcc@google.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pcc@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).