From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linux.org.uk header.i=@linux.org.uk header.b="cee1Opee" Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [IPv6:2a03:a000:7:0:5054:ff:fe1c:15ff]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26612110; Wed, 6 Dec 2023 19:15:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.org.uk; s=zeniv-20220401; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=ikyQNDZSs7x392fCLkxFtZ8cjqbTuYZcw0JdF/jOx7Q=; b=cee1OpeemiJOyTxllx1VHwGK5e gmWahVa18cIhmTsUgG64nYuTzCmSPxOJvru3ApiVKKGcg67Mtz3q5aTSbzS/4Un+LjGjUng7u+iLY 5PwKROUYBZ4p9SA3TGUQK+skkWDdO2xCsmZbDhsDLX73TSTEOdy7/083iPTO4WEvJtOPXXuU8ZXwm fdC25rldwh5Ug9yeRrINMkPFoJpA+mKmiu3+KSQypdhyKl757SbbFYnzj7eOENNFRdqAfLPrxKWeY PYQs8e+3J0bkxANfUcogshBBc4+XLdsC1t2RNjFi2cAIt9jHKvaptc/nEQoDM+B2SyjPPEsoaRx7t CjsSE29g==; Received: from viro by zeniv.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rB4r3-0083zj-0A; Thu, 07 Dec 2023 03:15:13 +0000 Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 03:15:13 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Dave Chinner Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-cachefs@redhat.com, dhowells@redhat.com, gfs2@lists.linux.dev, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] hash-bl: explicitly initialise hash-bl heads Message-ID: <20231207031513.GX1674809@ZenIV> References: <20231206060629.2827226-1-david@fromorbit.com> <20231206060629.2827226-10-david@fromorbit.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231206060629.2827226-10-david@fromorbit.com> Sender: Al Viro On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 05:05:38PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner > > Because we are going to change how the structure is laid out to > support RTPREEMPT and LOCKDEP, just assuming that the hash table is > allocated as zeroed memory is no longer sufficient to initialise > a hash-bl table. static inline void init_bl_hash(struct hlist_bl *table, int shift)?