linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
To: "Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	Jeff Xu <jeffxu@google.com>,
	 Jorge Lucangeli Obes <jorgelo@chromium.org>,
	Allen Webb <allenwebb@google.com>,
	 Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@google.com>,
	Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	 Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com>,
	Matt Bobrowski <repnop@google.com>,
	 linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/9] landlock: Optimize the number of calls to get_access_mask slightly
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 10:38:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240105.He4eiLae7phu@digikod.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231208155121.1943775-4-gnoack@google.com>

I'll send these first three patches for the next merge window (next
week). You can remove them in the next series.

Thanks!

On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 04:51:15PM +0100, Günther Noack wrote:
> This call is now going through a function pointer,
> and it is not as obvious any more that it will be inlined.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com>
> ---
>  security/landlock/ruleset.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/landlock/ruleset.c b/security/landlock/ruleset.c
> index 789c81b26a50..e0a5fbf9201a 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/ruleset.c
> +++ b/security/landlock/ruleset.c
> @@ -723,11 +723,12 @@ landlock_init_layer_masks(const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain,
>  	/* Saves all handled accesses per layer. */
>  	for (layer_level = 0; layer_level < domain->num_layers; layer_level++) {
>  		const unsigned long access_req = access_request;
> +		const access_mask_t access_mask =
> +			get_access_mask(domain, layer_level);
>  		unsigned long access_bit;
>  
>  		for_each_set_bit(access_bit, &access_req, num_access) {
> -			if (BIT_ULL(access_bit) &
> -			    get_access_mask(domain, layer_level)) {
> +			if (BIT_ULL(access_bit) & access_mask) {
>  				(*layer_masks)[access_bit] |=
>  					BIT_ULL(layer_level);
>  				handled_accesses |= BIT_ULL(access_bit);
> -- 
> 2.43.0.472.g3155946c3a-goog
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-05  9:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-08 15:51 [PATCH v8 0/9] Landlock: IOCTL support Günther Noack
2023-12-08 15:51 ` [PATCH v8 1/9] landlock: Remove remaining "inline" modifiers in .c files Günther Noack
2023-12-08 15:51 ` [PATCH v8 2/9] selftests/landlock: Rename "permitted" to "allowed" in ftruncate tests Günther Noack
2023-12-08 15:51 ` [PATCH v8 3/9] landlock: Optimize the number of calls to get_access_mask slightly Günther Noack
2024-01-05  9:38   ` Mickaël Salaün [this message]
2023-12-08 15:51 ` [PATCH v8 4/9] landlock: Add IOCTL access right Günther Noack
2023-12-14  9:26   ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-12-14 10:14     ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-12-14 14:28       ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-01-30 18:13         ` Günther Noack
2024-01-31 16:52           ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-12-08 15:51 ` [PATCH v8 5/9] selftests/landlock: Test IOCTL support Günther Noack
2023-12-15 12:52   ` Aishwarya TCV
2024-01-12 17:31     ` Günther Noack
2024-01-12 18:59       ` Mark Brown
2024-01-15 14:20     ` Günther Noack
2023-12-08 15:51 ` [PATCH v8 6/9] selftests/landlock: Test IOCTL with memfds Günther Noack
2023-12-08 15:51 ` [PATCH v8 7/9] selftests/landlock: Test ioctl(2) and ftruncate(2) with open(O_PATH) Günther Noack
2023-12-08 15:51 ` [PATCH v8 8/9] samples/landlock: Add support for LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_IOCTL Günther Noack
2023-12-08 15:51 ` [PATCH v8 9/9] landlock: Document IOCTL support Günther Noack
2023-12-11  7:04   ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-12-11  8:49     ` Günther Noack
2023-12-13 11:21       ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-12-13 11:25   ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-01-12 11:51     ` Günther Noack

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240105.He4eiLae7phu@digikod.net \
    --to=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=allenwebb@google.com \
    --cc=dtor@google.com \
    --cc=gnoack@google.com \
    --cc=jeffxu@google.com \
    --cc=jorgelo@chromium.org \
    --cc=konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=repnop@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).