From: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <kernel@pankajraghav.com>
To: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] buffer: Add kernel-doc for block_dirty_folio()
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 14:31:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240108133117.xtkbzeiqq6dtesm5@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240104163652.3705753-3-willy@infradead.org>
> + * If the folio has buffers, the uptodate buffers are set dirty, to
> + * preserve dirty-state coherency between the folio and the buffers.
> + * It the folio does not have buffers then when they are later attached
s/It the folio/If the folio
> + * they will all be set dirty.
Is it better to rephrase it slightly as follows:
If the folio does not have buffers, they will all be set dirty when they
are later attached.
> + *
> + * The buffers are dirtied before the folio is dirtied. There's a small
> + * race window in which writeback may see the folio cleanness but not the
> + * buffer dirtiness. That's fine. If this code were to set the folio
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-08 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-04 16:36 [PATCH 0/5] Improve buffer head documentation Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2024-01-04 16:36 ` [PATCH 1/5] doc: Improve the description of __folio_mark_dirty Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2024-01-04 21:08 ` Randy Dunlap
2024-01-04 16:36 ` [PATCH 2/5] buffer: Add kernel-doc for block_dirty_folio() Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2024-01-04 21:06 ` Randy Dunlap
2024-01-04 22:41 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-01-08 13:31 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) [this message]
2024-01-08 13:35 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-01-08 16:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-01-08 17:47 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-01-04 16:36 ` [PATCH 3/5] buffer: Add kernel-doc for try_to_free_buffers() Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2024-01-04 16:36 ` [PATCH 4/5] buffer: Fix __bread() kernel-doc Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2024-01-08 14:58 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-01-08 16:09 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-01-08 18:53 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-01-04 16:36 ` [PATCH 5/5] doc: Split buffer.rst out of api-summary.rst Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240108133117.xtkbzeiqq6dtesm5@localhost \
--to=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).