From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [62.89.141.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D06A11B7E0 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 22:22:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=zeniv.linux.org.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ftp.linux.org.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linux.org.uk header.i=@linux.org.uk header.b="CtGckjyW" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.org.uk; s=zeniv-20220401; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=QiGKtmgcE8jzkuRaruVyoA8kGC+xawHe1zvf8F3VIFE=; b=CtGckjyWPR83vmNWxm+0loi4/N vEPZDV4dRdG5ullRCAKvExs8coIprvxH7yWnm7EXHw6V4MOoZXn6dpNvv4D2ySeWOj+RcjA0zYESK BRKkS4RRqMrJDzpTSAclNa3KqVFeCxOkf7PU+CwiMOhsHaBC/rrbaSOl4LFqtYrx8Ml7i7iHj7IqI qhXUA8JM4HCKQCnNxtXpvrbTMwC56SoCaRWaxjFn+SwlFOxbIAhqCqegbHOFuDt+AXFHz2b2zJeMs Fc55WIe63Xi+aIf4i7CB+Y3ShlabidzmlBG9d8CLccHks9fXTwlauHQwseAbBr97YnsF8NoTFS2FC T7hMmVPw==; Received: from viro by zeniv.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rPVLY-003Vrs-2M; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 22:22:20 +0000 Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 22:22:20 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Bruno Haible Cc: Evgeniy Dushistov , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ufs filesystem cannot mount NetBSD/arm64 partition Message-ID: <20240115222220.GH1674809@ZenIV> References: <4014963.3daJWjYHZt@nimes> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4014963.3daJWjYHZt@nimes> Sender: Al Viro On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 11:05:51PM +0100, Bruno Haible wrote: > Whereas this partition can be mounted fine on FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD. > FreeBSD 11: > # mount -r -t ufs /dev/ada1s2 /mnt > NetBSD 9.3: > # mount -r -t ffs /dev/wd1a /mnt > OpenBSD 7.4: > # mount -r -t ffs /dev/wd1j /mnt > > The source code line which emits the > ufs: ufs_fill_super(): fragment size 8192 is too large > error is obviously linux/fs/ufs/super.c:1083. Lovely... Does it really have 8Kb fragments? That would be painful to deal with - a plenty of places in there assume that fragment fits into a page...