From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 09/19] writeback: Simplify the loops in write_cache_pages()
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 09:57:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240125085758.2393327-10-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240125085758.2393327-1-hch@lst.de>
From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>
Collapse the two nested loops into one. This is needed as a step
towards turning this into an iterator.
Note that this drops the "index <= end" check in the previous outer loop
and just relies on filemap_get_folios_tag() to return 0 entries when
index > end. This actually has a subtle implication when end == -1
because then the returned index will be -1 as well and thus if there is
page present on index -1, we could be looping indefinitely. But as the
comment in filemap_get_folios_tag documents this as already broken anyway
we should not worry about it here either. The fix for that would
probably a change to the filemap_get_folios_tag() calling convention.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
[hch: updated the commit log based on feedback from Jan Kara]
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
---
mm/page-writeback.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index cec683c7217d2e..d6ac414ddce9ca 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -2475,6 +2475,7 @@ int write_cache_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
{
int error;
pgoff_t end; /* Inclusive */
+ int i = 0;
if (wbc->range_cyclic) {
wbc->index = mapping->writeback_index; /* prev offset */
@@ -2489,63 +2490,60 @@ int write_cache_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
folio_batch_init(&wbc->fbatch);
wbc->err = 0;
- while (wbc->index <= end) {
- int i;
-
- writeback_get_batch(mapping, wbc);
+ for (;;) {
+ struct folio *folio;
+ unsigned long nr;
+ if (i == wbc->fbatch.nr) {
+ writeback_get_batch(mapping, wbc);
+ i = 0;
+ }
if (wbc->fbatch.nr == 0)
break;
- for (i = 0; i < wbc->fbatch.nr; i++) {
- struct folio *folio = wbc->fbatch.folios[i];
- unsigned long nr;
+ folio = wbc->fbatch.folios[i++];
- folio_lock(folio);
- if (!folio_prepare_writeback(mapping, wbc, folio)) {
- folio_unlock(folio);
- continue;
- }
+ folio_lock(folio);
+ if (!folio_prepare_writeback(mapping, wbc, folio)) {
+ folio_unlock(folio);
+ continue;
+ }
- trace_wbc_writepage(wbc, inode_to_bdi(mapping->host));
+ trace_wbc_writepage(wbc, inode_to_bdi(mapping->host));
- error = writepage(folio, wbc, data);
- nr = folio_nr_pages(folio);
- wbc->nr_to_write -= nr;
+ error = writepage(folio, wbc, data);
+ nr = folio_nr_pages(folio);
+ wbc->nr_to_write -= nr;
- /*
- * Handle the legacy AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE magic return
- * value. Eventually all instances should just unlock
- * the folio themselves and return 0;
- */
- if (error == AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE) {
- folio_unlock(folio);
- error = 0;
- }
-
- if (error && !wbc->err)
- wbc->err = error;
+ /*
+ * Handle the legacy AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE magic return value.
+ * Eventually all instances should just unlock the folio
+ * themselves and return 0;
+ */
+ if (error == AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE) {
+ folio_unlock(folio);
+ error = 0;
+ }
- /*
- * For integrity sync we have to keep going until we
- * have written all the folios we tagged for writeback
- * prior to entering this loop, even if we run past
- * wbc->nr_to_write or encounter errors. This is
- * because the file system may still have state to clear
- * for each folio. We'll eventually return the first
- * error encountered.
- *
- * For background writeback just push done_index past
- * this folio so that we can just restart where we left
- * off and media errors won't choke writeout for the
- * entire file.
- */
- if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE &&
- (wbc->err || wbc->nr_to_write <= 0)) {
- writeback_finish(mapping, wbc,
- folio->index + nr);
- return error;
- }
+ if (error && !wbc->err)
+ wbc->err = error;
+
+ /*
+ * For integrity sync we have to keep going until we have
+ * written all the folios we tagged for writeback prior to
+ * entering this loop, even if we run past wbc->nr_to_write or
+ * encounter errors. This is because the file system may still
+ * have state to clear for each folio. We'll eventually return
+ * the first error encountered.
+ *
+ * For background writeback just push done_index past this folio
+ * so that we can just restart where we left off and media
+ * errors won't choke writeout for the entire file.
+ */
+ if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE &&
+ (wbc->err || wbc->nr_to_write <= 0)) {
+ writeback_finish(mapping, wbc, folio->index + nr);
+ return error;
}
}
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-25 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-25 8:57 Convert write_cache_pages() to an iterator v5 Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 01/19] writeback: fix done_index when hitting the wbc->nr_to_write Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 02/19] writeback: also update wbc->nr_to_write on writeback failure Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 03/19] writeback: rework the loop termination condition in write_cache_pages Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 04/19] writeback: only update ->writeback_index for range_cyclic writeback Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 05/19] writeback: remove a duplicate prototype for tag_pages_for_writeback Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 06/19] writeback: Factor out writeback_finish() Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-29 20:13 ` Brian Foster
2024-01-30 14:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-30 14:28 ` Brian Foster
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 07/19] writeback: Factor writeback_get_batch() out of write_cache_pages() Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 08/19] writeback: Factor folio_prepare_writeback() " Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 8:57 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 10/19] pagevec: Add ability to iterate a queue Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 11/19] writeback: Use the folio_batch queue iterator Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 12/19] writeback: Factor writeback_iter_init() out of write_cache_pages() Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 13/19] writeback: Move the folio_prepare_writeback loop " Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 14/19] writeback: Factor writeback_iter_next() " Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 15/19] writeback: Add for_each_writeback_folio() Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 16/19] writeback: Remove a use of write_cache_pages() from do_writepages() Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 17/19] writeback: update the kerneldoc comment for tag_pages_for_writeback Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 18/19] iomap: Convert iomap_writepages() to use for_each_writeback_folio() Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-30 10:03 ` Jan Kara
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 19/19] writeback: simplify writeback iteration Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-30 10:46 ` Jan Kara
2024-01-30 14:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-30 14:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-30 14:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-30 21:50 ` Jan Kara
2024-01-31 7:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-31 10:40 ` Jan Kara
2024-01-31 10:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-31 12:50 ` Brian Foster
2024-01-31 13:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240125085758.2393327-10-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).