From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 08/19] writeback: Factor folio_prepare_writeback() out of write_cache_pages()
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 09:57:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240125085758.2393327-9-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240125085758.2393327-1-hch@lst.de>
From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>
Reduce write_cache_pages() by about 30 lines; much of it is commentary,
but it all bundles nicely into an obvious function.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
[hch: rename should_writeback_folio to folio_prepare_writeback based on
a comment from Jan Kara]
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
---
mm/page-writeback.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index 426d929741e46e..cec683c7217d2e 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -2397,6 +2397,38 @@ static pgoff_t wbc_end(struct writeback_control *wbc)
return wbc->range_end >> PAGE_SHIFT;
}
+static bool folio_prepare_writeback(struct address_space *mapping,
+ struct writeback_control *wbc, struct folio *folio)
+{
+ /*
+ * Folio truncated or invalidated. We can freely skip it then,
+ * even for data integrity operations: the folio has disappeared
+ * concurrently, so there could be no real expectation of this
+ * data integrity operation even if there is now a new, dirty
+ * folio at the same pagecache index.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(folio->mapping != mapping))
+ return false;
+
+ /*
+ * Did somebody else write it for us?
+ */
+ if (!folio_test_dirty(folio))
+ return false;
+
+ if (folio_test_writeback(folio)) {
+ if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE)
+ return false;
+ folio_wait_writeback(folio);
+ }
+ BUG_ON(folio_test_writeback(folio));
+
+ if (!folio_clear_dirty_for_io(folio))
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
static void writeback_get_batch(struct address_space *mapping,
struct writeback_control *wbc)
{
@@ -2470,38 +2502,13 @@ int write_cache_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
unsigned long nr;
folio_lock(folio);
-
- /*
- * Page truncated or invalidated. We can freely skip it
- * then, even for data integrity operations: the page
- * has disappeared concurrently, so there could be no
- * real expectation of this data integrity operation
- * even if there is now a new, dirty page at the same
- * pagecache address.
- */
- if (unlikely(folio->mapping != mapping)) {
-continue_unlock:
+ if (!folio_prepare_writeback(mapping, wbc, folio)) {
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
- if (!folio_test_dirty(folio)) {
- /* someone wrote it for us */
- goto continue_unlock;
- }
-
- if (folio_test_writeback(folio)) {
- if (wbc->sync_mode != WB_SYNC_NONE)
- folio_wait_writeback(folio);
- else
- goto continue_unlock;
- }
-
- BUG_ON(folio_test_writeback(folio));
- if (!folio_clear_dirty_for_io(folio))
- goto continue_unlock;
-
trace_wbc_writepage(wbc, inode_to_bdi(mapping->host));
+
error = writepage(folio, wbc, data);
nr = folio_nr_pages(folio);
wbc->nr_to_write -= nr;
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-25 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-25 8:57 Convert write_cache_pages() to an iterator v5 Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 01/19] writeback: fix done_index when hitting the wbc->nr_to_write Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 02/19] writeback: also update wbc->nr_to_write on writeback failure Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 03/19] writeback: rework the loop termination condition in write_cache_pages Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 04/19] writeback: only update ->writeback_index for range_cyclic writeback Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 05/19] writeback: remove a duplicate prototype for tag_pages_for_writeback Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 06/19] writeback: Factor out writeback_finish() Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-29 20:13 ` Brian Foster
2024-01-30 14:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-30 14:28 ` Brian Foster
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 07/19] writeback: Factor writeback_get_batch() out of write_cache_pages() Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 8:57 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 09/19] writeback: Simplify the loops in write_cache_pages() Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 10/19] pagevec: Add ability to iterate a queue Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 11/19] writeback: Use the folio_batch queue iterator Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 12/19] writeback: Factor writeback_iter_init() out of write_cache_pages() Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 13/19] writeback: Move the folio_prepare_writeback loop " Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 14/19] writeback: Factor writeback_iter_next() " Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 15/19] writeback: Add for_each_writeback_folio() Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 16/19] writeback: Remove a use of write_cache_pages() from do_writepages() Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 17/19] writeback: update the kerneldoc comment for tag_pages_for_writeback Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 18/19] iomap: Convert iomap_writepages() to use for_each_writeback_folio() Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-30 10:03 ` Jan Kara
2024-01-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 19/19] writeback: simplify writeback iteration Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-30 10:46 ` Jan Kara
2024-01-30 14:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-30 14:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-30 14:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-30 21:50 ` Jan Kara
2024-01-31 7:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-31 10:40 ` Jan Kara
2024-01-31 10:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-31 12:50 ` Brian Foster
2024-01-31 13:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240125085758.2393327-9-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).