From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63CB763D9; Sun, 28 Jan 2024 04:30:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.55.52.88 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706416219; cv=none; b=uFBU9PmOzpayJ/rX2EnCrWASkFn9nVeGGRk5Y+4BUxSLALK6hindrNuwTJxfhIaEvjDi6Lpsv+g9bhpYFsvVGgIvLENxVS5vtWPBTMHFQgwYiXPXXsQNTw2v3u3bWDzEdgu0pAcHb5MxIC8Ok7JIL6jIfYXJGWkt2TEpYuxUhwc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706416219; c=relaxed/simple; bh=82WJ+QojB1cPxyI/Ym5sbW8tqYYq8qJcoOqZ+Ywj8As=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=C5z6BMoF7PTVOxl5IIcOJ5BObOuUePKWipPwoIpUs8ZbTwYpEH60xLok6FQeyhPMdHigvsjiu0ssGu8aHL28h6oB1mngL/YHIvsH2bfYh1s7eteZMSXlr8Sw/L8+nfKIvw6C2GqUgRVVswEYClTEfDyn27NhzHR4mzexHjGwh04= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=JXPyK6MX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.55.52.88 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="JXPyK6MX" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1706416217; x=1737952217; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=82WJ+QojB1cPxyI/Ym5sbW8tqYYq8qJcoOqZ+Ywj8As=; b=JXPyK6MXcFSbRkff/npSvwudKlAen/NhuwS+1rNkF4JEY3Anu1nwCkFY zkM4sQouM/peuRgupTufnptLboml/BIpqIQ0LAWNrqArv2Zn4x+OfkAbx A40wi4Y79WXxuPtTiqK4TqiODwBl8Z2bZ9SJPxLKH2vuwrkoRPbF3L8jr oKUAubU/ZZNhlTCKLh2tpBUtskIBlAELrMvQZLqi8M3LkLTDCFTGz1n5J hQCi5db5GVe1931s5MwHXOAPhLaj5BB7TftbbTD5kXiStG6dfk1wLUawq 0v9QnaiJTToPfaSNkoiTdUwc8p66qcz+It9TmuKaIMkxarueS6ILzkKYm w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10966"; a="433900316" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,220,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="433900316" Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Jan 2024 20:30:16 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10966"; a="910718820" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,220,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="910718820" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 370188f8dc87) ([10.239.97.150]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Jan 2024 20:30:13 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 370188f8dc87 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rTwo7-00034i-1R; Sun, 28 Jan 2024 04:30:11 +0000 Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2024 12:29:51 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Kent Overstreet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Kent Overstreet , peterz@infradead.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] pktcdvd: kill mutex_lock_nested() usage Message-ID: <202401281210.ZqZ0bZlb-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240127020833.487907-3-kent.overstreet@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240127020833.487907-3-kent.overstreet@linux.dev> Hi Kent, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on tip/locking/core] [also build test ERROR on net/main net-next/main linus/master v6.8-rc1 next-20240125] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Kent-Overstreet/fs-pipe-Convert-to-lockdep_cmp_fn/20240127-101832 base: tip/locking/core patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240127020833.487907-3-kent.overstreet%40linux.dev patch subject: [PATCH 2/4] pktcdvd: kill mutex_lock_nested() usage config: mips-randconfig-r063-20240127 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240128/202401281210.ZqZ0bZlb-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 15.0.7 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 8dfdcc7b7bf66834a761bd8de445840ef68e4d1a) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240128/202401281210.ZqZ0bZlb-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401281210.ZqZ0bZlb-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4925:9: error: call to undeclared function 'cmp_int'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] return cmp_int((unsigned long) a, (unsigned long) b); ^ kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4925:9: note: did you mean 'smp_init'? include/linux/smp.h:225:20: note: 'smp_init' declared here static inline void smp_init(void) { } ^ 1 error generated. vim +/cmp_int +4925 kernel/locking/lockdep.c 4920 4921 #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING 4922 int lockdep_ptr_order_cmp_fn(const struct lockdep_map *a, 4923 const struct lockdep_map *b) 4924 { > 4925 return cmp_int((unsigned long) a, (unsigned long) b); 4926 } 4927 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki