From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 579E6153BC8; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:29:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706542177; cv=none; b=bfhnLE8sJPn+owqkvjMsVK+GnsivZAEL7TAGQJpYnJuo3VfXBG5RLCcRV8CoecS9AnojuCZQGQo1baDkxRZWkIZgzl3aEqnwqc66h4UGYSR8mD9cIHuLfwsR1HFq9eBeore1lyJh9y3vgirW2Vcy4AyffZSuxCoWvdyC+ArlDks= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706542177; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DVIU5f/0s1xTiAVYDUxFxNiL/wgdqiW6RWz3Yy0N6eU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=uOrGSQK0qs21H7i+ASNLvtsnpZK1nVhSPO+N/9dbnDm2p/C7HfRXVRGhhBe0p5kzuiR6+hLSQyobnfSUE/7WYy6f2LTpcHg9MpavNAsdkhLho84NL/VyBiXG7ZnlDz5GfCIP2f/y2SWo2bvpwHuWrWXE7gtzvcZd+Q9iPkTV7Bw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=q0HvbDS2; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="q0HvbDS2" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D487CC433C7; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:29:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1706542176; bh=DVIU5f/0s1xTiAVYDUxFxNiL/wgdqiW6RWz3Yy0N6eU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=q0HvbDS2WMAky5P9/vveAhYlGLOY+CahQsZIvtb6Ud2FsikTNX82J4dfO5ND4IpgR aURHZFgtAr/5F2yAaNHj95PCQ0aVjZjPCQbdHQuj2U+TP8hCc9F7VkSF8ss2NLZF3Q 2xrTAAj9MX1BRDE6cmn1U8gtslnO1eK9XCGYlboBIDDQTVrp+uRbkWJG7GokGBqcN7 bhuoGIDdZW81jxKQaQSTf72Mzmg9k7LlxrIYQ3Aa2M/LdrcPFXaFnkR1sVsXHUKTBi nSyBMZOSa/jblbtpW2FMRpK6jU6snEm21SWUcMGe4CL4HMCxp05UXMLIrvAUMoVUgY la0VMUhyNIJuQ== Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 16:29:32 +0100 From: Christian Brauner To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Jan Kara , Jens Axboe , "Darrick J. Wong" , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] fs,drivers: remove bdev_inode() usage outside of block layer and drivers Message-ID: <20240129-lobpreisen-arterien-e300ee15dba8@brauner> References: <20240129-vfs-bdev-file-bd_inode-v1-0-42eb9eea96cf@kernel.org> <20240129-vfs-bdev-file-bd_inode-v1-2-42eb9eea96cf@kernel.org> <20240129143709.GA568@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240129143709.GA568@lst.de> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 03:37:09PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Most of these really should be using proper high level APIs. The > last round of work on this is here: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nilfs/4b11a311-c121-1f44-0ccf-a3966a396994@huaweicloud.com/ Are you saying that I should just drop this patch here?