From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@suse.de>
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jaegeuk@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu,
amir73il@gmail.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/12] fscrypt: Drop d_revalidate for valid dentries during lookup
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 16:47:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240131004724.GC2020@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240129204330.32346-5-krisman@suse.de>
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 05:43:22PM -0300, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> Unencrypted and encrypted-dentries where the key is available don't need
> to be revalidated with regards to fscrypt, since they don't go stale
> from under VFS and the key cannot be removed for the encrypted case
> without evicting the dentry. Mark them with d_set_always_valid, to
"d_set_always_valid" doesn't appear in the diff itself.
> diff --git a/include/linux/fscrypt.h b/include/linux/fscrypt.h
> index 4aaf847955c0..a22997b9f35c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fscrypt.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fscrypt.h
> @@ -942,11 +942,22 @@ static inline int fscrypt_prepare_rename(struct inode *old_dir,
> static inline void fscrypt_prepare_lookup_dentry(struct dentry *dentry,
> bool is_nokey_name)
> {
> - if (is_nokey_name) {
> - spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
> + spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
> +
> + if (is_nokey_name)
> dentry->d_flags |= DCACHE_NOKEY_NAME;
> - spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
> + else if (dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_OP_REVALIDATE &&
> + dentry->d_op->d_revalidate == fscrypt_d_revalidate) {
> + /*
> + * Unencrypted dentries and encrypted dentries where the
> + * key is available are always valid from fscrypt
> + * perspective. Avoid the cost of calling
> + * fscrypt_d_revalidate unnecessarily.
> + */
> + dentry->d_flags &= ~DCACHE_OP_REVALIDATE;
> }
> +
> + spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
This makes lookups in unencrypted directories start doing the
spin_lock/spin_unlock pair. Is that really necessary?
These changes also make the inline function fscrypt_prepare_lookup() very long
(when including the fscrypt_prepare_lookup_dentry() that's inlined into it).
The rule that I'm trying to follow is that to the extent that the fscrypt helper
functions are inlined, the inline part should be a fast path for unencrypted
directories. Encrypted directories should be handled out-of-line.
So looking at the original fscrypt_prepare_lookup():
static inline int fscrypt_prepare_lookup(struct inode *dir,
struct dentry *dentry,
struct fscrypt_name *fname)
{
if (IS_ENCRYPTED(dir))
return __fscrypt_prepare_lookup(dir, dentry, fname);
memset(fname, 0, sizeof(*fname));
fname->usr_fname = &dentry->d_name;
fname->disk_name.name = (unsigned char *)dentry->d_name.name;
fname->disk_name.len = dentry->d_name.len;
return 0;
}
If you could just add the DCACHE_OP_REVALIDATE clearing for dentries in
unencrypted directories just before the "return 0;", hopefully without the
spinlock, that would be good. Yes, that does mean that
__fscrypt_prepare_lookup() will have to handle it too, for the case of dentries
in encrypted directories, but that seems okay.
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-31 0:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-29 20:43 [PATCH v5 00/12] Set casefold/fscrypt dentry operations through sb->s_d_op Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-01-29 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] ovl: Reject mounting over case-insensitive directories Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-01-31 0:22 ` Eric Biggers
2024-01-31 0:31 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-01-29 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] fscrypt: Factor out a helper to configure the lookup dentry Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-01-31 0:29 ` Eric Biggers
2024-01-29 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] fscrypt: Call fscrypt_prepare_lookup_dentry on unencrypted dentries Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-01-29 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] fscrypt: Drop d_revalidate for valid dentries during lookup Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-01-31 0:47 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2024-01-31 18:35 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-02-01 3:24 ` Eric Biggers
2024-02-02 14:50 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-02-09 14:03 ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-09 14:46 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-01-29 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] fscrypt: Drop d_revalidate once the key is added Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-01-29 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] fscrypt: Ignore plaintext dentries during d_move Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-01-31 0:55 ` Eric Biggers
2024-01-29 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] libfs: Merge encrypted_ci_dentry_ops and ci_dentry_ops Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-01-31 1:00 ` Eric Biggers
2024-01-29 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 08/12] libfs: Add helper to choose dentry operations at mount-time Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-01-29 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] ext4: Configure dentry operations at dentry-creation time Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-02-02 15:56 ` Theodore Ts'o
2024-01-29 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] f2fs: " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-01-29 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] ubifs: " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-01-29 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] libfs: Drop generic_set_encrypted_ci_d_ops Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240131004724.GC2020@sol.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=krisman@suse.de \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).