From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
chuck.lever@oracle.com, jlayton@kernel.org,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org,
edumazet@google.com, davem@davemloft.net,
alexander.duyck@gmail.com, sridhar.samudrala@intel.com,
willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, weiwan@google.com,
David.Laight@ACULAB.COM, arnd@arndb.de, sdf@google.com,
amritha.nambiar@intel.com,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org (open list:FILESYSTEMS (VFS and
infrastructure))
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 1/4] eventpoll: support busy poll per epoll instance
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 11:04:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240207110413.0cfedc37@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240205210453.11301-2-jdamato@fastly.com>
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 21:04:46 +0000 Joe Damato wrote:
> Allow busy polling on a per-epoll context basis. The per-epoll context
> usec timeout value is preferred, but the pre-existing system wide sysctl
> value is still supported if it specified.
Why do we need u64 for usecs? I think u16 would do, and u32 would give
a very solid "engineering margin". If it was discussed in previous
versions I think it's worth explaining in the commit message.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-07 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-05 21:04 [PATCH net-next v6 0/4] Per epoll context busy poll support Joe Damato
2024-02-05 21:04 ` [PATCH net-next v6 1/4] eventpoll: support busy poll per epoll instance Joe Damato
2024-02-07 19:04 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-02-07 19:14 ` Joe Damato
2024-02-07 20:11 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-07 20:23 ` Joe Damato
2024-02-07 20:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-08 17:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-02-08 18:06 ` Joe Damato
2024-02-05 21:04 ` [PATCH net-next v6 2/4] eventpoll: Add per-epoll busy poll packet budget Joe Damato
2024-02-07 19:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-08 17:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-02-05 21:04 ` [PATCH net-next v6 3/4] eventpoll: Add per-epoll prefer busy poll option Joe Damato
2024-02-07 19:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-08 17:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-02-05 21:04 ` [PATCH net-next v6 4/4] eventpoll: Add epoll ioctl for epoll_params Joe Damato
2024-02-07 8:37 ` Jiri Slaby
2024-02-07 18:50 ` Joe Damato
2024-02-07 19:07 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-07 19:16 ` Joe Damato
2024-02-07 20:18 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-06 18:51 ` [PATCH net-next v6 0/4] Per epoll context busy poll support Stanislav Fomichev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240207110413.0cfedc37@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=amritha.nambiar@intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jdamato@fastly.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=weiwan@google.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).