From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB14E33CFC; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 11:19:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.158.5 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707823163; cv=none; b=P5HWe+HAZtaEzB7MP5UduBL12fCj7ovmG/7oe/LO5aM6kIpRXSAvQZf5zUsX2vcs5CuC7AbU2cdmPLF3apVjINWHyGKpq/52GBF4fyG/VArFJAS7RJU0qYjfoeDh9oSAgK12DPW7POAKEHjRSASSnJ4CD6rlL+C7U1oKJt0SyYY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707823163; c=relaxed/simple; bh=U7WN3EXjdjDY+WOk1krQTvyOnm0+62Jv90SPNEBQJN4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=iqNbBaSbLvDe9ahW9FsMtV4RD4+epPL3xLvkbY87LLLoL0RBwjU9jVUpBTMDJlUlQqcz18h6ZGKcDE4zwt1ThCuPQARR9eKjT0VsSynJoK0LxlKTIHukEqhOHkTWILNFd9zQwnPDw8zs0D3IScGtCLPjVkbzptM6H5QObPEE7Z4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b=ZZEg/ZnC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.158.5 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="ZZEg/ZnC" Received: from pps.filterd (m0353724.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 41DAI2V3018656; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 11:18:56 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=pp1; bh=kRixhbN6Ym1Zmusnenh11GI105dw0bqQnIm1JeLCSK8=; b=ZZEg/ZnCZtXf+0rAXEh14DIZ8Sye5Nhv5T7O/GHGqhe/UlUBxyyIjoPTy+kciAagGdPa GN5A8rXGjLKKzQq5azUSEepMOhG1uAfv2MPHyLvkEPgkJVSEpKyMUoV+o6akZPot8bgZ rQxFMy5cJURaY3EA+zCymd6cySK6yRVWgj83u6aX9PqjCXSbHQSP+a3F9lVtAQU03W7Z cNVAbaZ5MibgX3c9/TPRO+DvscRxn4PXsP2cu6rx6BmYvr6JcXO2Kf3VfGBOeM6ixewH ViLcLfXfoS/DiZeOOHY7DyW3aHWKQk7MwYu4CJoSHcMD61K/mv1ztVb85syzviIuF7VA cw== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3w86hts9w4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 13 Feb 2024 11:18:56 +0000 Received: from m0353724.ppops.net (m0353724.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 41DB1fNm022081; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 11:18:55 GMT Received: from ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5d.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.93]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3w86hts9vm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 13 Feb 2024 11:18:55 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 41D8P7Jh016479; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 11:18:54 GMT Received: from smtprelay04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.228]) by ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3w6mymeuwd-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 13 Feb 2024 11:18:54 +0000 Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.105]) by smtprelay04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 41DBIpXF45809942 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 13 Feb 2024 11:18:53 GMT Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A7F120040; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 11:18:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C362004D; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 11:18:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from osiris (unknown [9.152.212.60]) by smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 11:18:50 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 12:18:49 +0100 From: Heiko Carstens To: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: Dan Williams , Arnd Bergmann , Dave Chinner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Vishal Verma , Dave Jiang , Matthew Wilcox , Russell King , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Alasdair Kergon , Mike Snitzer , Mikulas Patocka Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/8] dcssblk: Handle alloc_dax() -EOPNOTSUPP failure Message-ID: <20240213111849.6534-A-hca@linux.ibm.com> References: <20240212163101.19614-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <20240212163101.19614-5-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240212163101.19614-5-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: v7etkd58sOZye-tw7r45w1hzzfW55uLg X-Proofpoint-GUID: ex2g2pAdh4h8FGNj8JP3P_9xuvlIPkmS X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.272,Aquarius:18.0.1011,Hydra:6.0.619,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2024-02-13_06,2024-02-12_03,2023-05-22_02 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=800 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2311290000 definitions=main-2402130089 On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 11:30:57AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > In preparation for checking whether the architecture has data cache > aliasing within alloc_dax(), modify the error handling of dcssblk > dcssblk_add_store() to handle alloc_dax() -EOPNOTSUPP failures. > > Considering that s390 is not a data cache aliasing architecture, > and considering that DCSSBLK selects DAX, a return value of -EOPNOTSUPP > from alloc_dax() should make dcssblk_add_store() fail. > > Fixes: d92576f1167c ("dax: does not work correctly with virtual aliasing caches") > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers > Reviewed-by: Dan Williams ... > --- > drivers/s390/block/dcssblk.c | 11 ++++++----- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Acked-by: Heiko Carstens