linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: hch@lst.de, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org,
	dchinner@redhat.com, jack@suse.cz, chandan.babu@oracle.com,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	tytso@mit.edu, jbongio@google.com, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] fs: Add FS_XFLAG_ATOMICWRITES flag
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 09:08:00 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240213170800.GZ6184@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <28399201-e99f-4b03-b2c0-b66cc0d21ce6@oracle.com>

On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 12:58:30PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> On 02/02/2024 17:57, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 02:26:41PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> > > Add a flag indicating that a regular file is enabled for atomic writes.
> > 
> > This is a file attribute that mirrors an ondisk inode flag.  Actual
> > support for untorn file writes (for now) depends on both the iflag and
> > the underlying storage devices, which we can only really check at statx
> > and pwrite time.  This is the same story as FS_XFLAG_DAX, which signals
> > to the fs that we should try to enable the fsdax IO path on the file
> > (instead of the regular page cache), but applications have to query
> > STAT_ATTR_DAX to find out if they really got that IO path.
> 
> To be clear, are you suggesting to add this info to the commit message?

That and a S_ATOMICW flag for the inode that triggers the proposed
STAT_ATTR_ATOMICWRITES flag.

> > "try to enable atomic writes", perhaps? >
> > (and the comment for FS_XFLAG_DAX ought to read "try to use DAX for IO")
> 
> To me that sounds like "try to use DAX for IO, and, if not possible, fall
> back on some other method" - is that reality of what that flag does?

As hch said, yes.

--D

> Thanks,
> John
> 
> > 
> > --D
> > 
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
> > > ---
> > >   include/uapi/linux/fs.h | 1 +
> > >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/fs.h b/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
> > > index a0975ae81e64..b5b4e1db9576 100644
> > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
> > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
> > > @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ struct fsxattr {
> > >   #define FS_XFLAG_FILESTREAM	0x00004000	/* use filestream allocator */
> > >   #define FS_XFLAG_DAX		0x00008000	/* use DAX for IO */
> > >   #define FS_XFLAG_COWEXTSIZE	0x00010000	/* CoW extent size allocator hint */
> > > +#define FS_XFLAG_ATOMICWRITES	0x00020000	/* atomic writes enabled */
> > >   #define FS_XFLAG_HASATTR	0x80000000	/* no DIFLAG for this	*/
> > >   /* the read-only stuff doesn't really belong here, but any other place is
> > > -- 
> > > 2.31.1
> > > 
> > > 
> 
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-13 17:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-24 14:26 [PATCH 0/6] block atomic writes for XFS John Garry
2024-01-24 14:26 ` [PATCH 1/6] fs: iomap: Atomic write support John Garry
2024-02-02 17:25   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-05 11:29     ` John Garry
2024-02-13  6:55       ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-13  8:20         ` John Garry
2024-02-15 11:08           ` John Garry
2024-02-13 18:08       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-05 15:20   ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-05 15:41     ` John Garry
2024-01-24 14:26 ` [PATCH 2/6] fs: Add FS_XFLAG_ATOMICWRITES flag John Garry
2024-02-02 17:57   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-05 12:58     ` John Garry
2024-02-13  6:56       ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-13 17:08       ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-01-24 14:26 ` [PATCH 3/6] fs: xfs: Support FS_XFLAG_ATOMICWRITES for rtvol John Garry
2024-02-02 17:52   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-03  7:40     ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2024-02-05 12:51     ` John Garry
2024-02-13 17:22       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-14 12:19         ` John Garry
2024-01-24 14:26 ` [PATCH 4/6] fs: xfs: Support atomic write for statx John Garry
2024-02-02 18:05   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-05 13:10     ` John Garry
2024-02-13 17:37       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-14 12:26         ` John Garry
2024-02-09  7:00   ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2024-02-09 17:30     ` John Garry
2024-02-12 11:48       ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2024-02-12 12:05       ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2024-01-24 14:26 ` [PATCH RFC 5/6] fs: xfs: iomap atomic write support John Garry
2024-02-02 18:47   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-05 13:36     ` John Garry
2024-02-06  1:15       ` Dave Chinner
2024-02-06  9:53         ` John Garry
2024-02-07  0:06           ` Dave Chinner
2024-02-07 14:13             ` John Garry
2024-02-09  1:40               ` Dave Chinner
2024-02-09 12:47                 ` John Garry
2024-02-13 23:41                   ` Dave Chinner
2024-02-14 11:06                     ` John Garry
2024-02-14 23:03                       ` Dave Chinner
2024-02-15  9:53                         ` John Garry
2024-02-13 17:50       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-14 12:13         ` John Garry
2024-01-24 14:26 ` [PATCH 6/6] fs: xfs: Set FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE for FS_XFLAG_ATOMICWRITES set John Garry
2024-02-02 18:06   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-05 10:26     ` John Garry
2024-02-13 17:59       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-14 12:36         ` John Garry
2024-02-21 17:00           ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-21 17:38             ` John Garry
2024-02-24  4:18               ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-09  7:14 ` [PATCH 0/6] block atomic writes for XFS Ojaswin Mujoo
2024-02-09  9:22   ` John Garry
2024-02-12 12:06     ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2024-02-13  7:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-13 17:55   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-14  7:45     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-21 16:56       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23  6:57         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-13 23:50   ` Dave Chinner
2024-02-14  7:38     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-13  7:45 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-02-13  8:41   ` John Garry
2024-02-13  9:10     ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-02-13 22:49     ` Dave Chinner
2024-02-14 10:10       ` John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240213170800.GZ6184@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jbongio@google.com \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).