From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Adrian Vovk <adrianvovk@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Dropping page cache of individual fs
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 14:57:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240215135709.4zmfb7qlerztbq6b@quack3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3107a023-3173-4b3d-9623-71812b1e7eb6@gmail.com>
On Mon 29-01-24 19:13:17, Adrian Vovk wrote:
> Hello! I'm the "GNOME people" who Christian is referring to
Got back to thinking about this after a while...
> On 1/17/24 09:52, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > I feel like we're in an XY trap [1]. What Christian actually wants is
> > to not be able to access the contents of a file while the device it's
> > on is suspended, and we've gone from there to "must drop the page cache".
>
> What we really want is for the plaintext contents of the files to be gone
> from memory while the dm-crypt device backing them is suspended.
>
> Ultimately my goal is to limit the chance that an attacker with access to a
> user's suspended laptop will be able to access the user's encrypted data. I
> need to achieve this without forcing the user to completely log out/power
> off/etc their system; it must be invisible to the user. The key word here is
> limit; if we can remove _most_ files from memory _most_ of the time Ithink
> luksSuspend would be a lot more useful against cold boot than it is today.
Well, but if your attack vector are cold-boot attacks, then how does
freeing pages from the page cache help you? I mean sure the page allocator
will start tracking those pages with potentially sensitive content as free
but unless you also zero all of them, this doesn't help anything against
cold-boot attacks? The sensitive memory content is still there...
So you would also have to enable something like zero-on-page-free and
generally the cost of this is going to be pretty big?
> I understand that perfectly wiping all the files out of memory without
> completely unmounting the filesystem isn't feasible, and that's probably OK
> for our use-case. As long as most files can be removed from memory most of
> the time, anyway...
OK, understood. I guess in that case something like BLKFLSBUF ioctl on
steroids (to also evict filesystem caches, not only the block device) could
be useful for you.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-15 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-16 10:50 [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Dropping page cache of individual fs Christian Brauner
2024-01-16 11:45 ` Jan Kara
2024-01-17 12:53 ` Christian Brauner
2024-01-17 14:35 ` Jan Kara
2024-01-17 14:52 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-01-17 20:51 ` Phillip Susi
2024-01-17 20:58 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-01-18 14:26 ` Christian Brauner
2024-01-30 0:13 ` Adrian Vovk
2024-02-15 13:57 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2024-02-15 19:46 ` Adrian Vovk
2024-02-15 23:17 ` Dave Chinner
2024-02-16 1:14 ` Adrian Vovk
2024-02-16 20:38 ` init_on_alloc digression: " John Hubbard
2024-02-16 21:11 ` Adrian Vovk
2024-02-16 21:19 ` John Hubbard
2024-01-16 15:25 ` James Bottomley
2024-01-16 15:40 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-01-16 15:54 ` James Bottomley
2024-01-16 20:56 ` Dave Chinner
2024-01-17 6:17 ` Theodore Ts'o
2024-01-30 1:14 ` Adrian Vovk
2024-01-17 13:19 ` Christian Brauner
2024-01-17 22:26 ` Dave Chinner
2024-01-18 14:09 ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-05 17:39 ` Russell Haley
2024-02-17 4:04 ` Kent Overstreet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240215135709.4zmfb7qlerztbq6b@quack3 \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=adrianvovk@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).