From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 855AE7868B; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 12:08:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708085332; cv=none; b=gxdq8YoqFz9AzoU9t7mnrHUzssYDRfcItWZCJLMPGXrYAKpONWa9W/PgleGrIMJsXhO/H4DFYtKVT+d1Gdi2fPA5rCG2JODMT4KhrQaHokzRRVoaWBi+JalT00X891N7LIpk67X+FjEr5uluvwyIo4RSiV4CuvnwNcnoFMpuG1w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708085332; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qHbNI6yjXVOhnzBKZKp8fMbmEhmZPZ09P4nge02k6Dk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ih0J5S8Mf995lkiIKb6IS6vBQ+duLud1iiS7wFamq69Ou/i39d2b3D7wMyARLkA+la/0CEoU/Owa0p+ZGi/KyXwBXpJdu2v8XRVy8OzcyVM8KjR4Aq+u0B0HaXqdZ2aFwWFFgDCwq7gvK17irqPOfeKm1x4hFvSSDrjfP2nEW38= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=XxI1BODy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="XxI1BODy" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 729D9C433C7; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 12:08:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1708085332; bh=qHbNI6yjXVOhnzBKZKp8fMbmEhmZPZ09P4nge02k6Dk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=XxI1BODy2yDyI6e5+XT6VS8r7iZTCMgzBVMu2qqochReSXck1H8Dknd1lZBnu94vC eAL9wZCds9Fe8MonS9U1Z+LHhG6ckD7LwUQGCzOZO+/XjAQEgqTxZnKLMRyuJFhY5R XGnW4MSJRGJ42wgpxv43vGS5b2bZ9oqYEE3eM8QmAjd1rxnk2tA6lzzYGbNvXAKSAu JiW6IN4jNwCV8qZ/CP1sdAs6IrDm4AsNOFF5nIJt9pnplYwIS+LR0WCquNRUI0d+U0 FM5pkYYAplhVpsLloKQ5Gp9hR1tTgrOazacb59+IWigI1es+m8VoH8YIboXwN5zBNV GuueJLIgbeo4A== Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 13:08:46 +0100 From: Christian Brauner To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Bart Van Assche , Alexander Viro , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Avi Kivity , Sandeep Dhavale , Jens Axboe , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Kent Overstreet , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] fs/aio: Make io_cancel() generate completions again Message-ID: <20240216-wolle-lektor-105fecc77d6b@brauner> References: <20240215204739.2677806-1-bvanassche@acm.org> <20240215204739.2677806-3-bvanassche@acm.org> <20240216071325.GA10830@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240216071325.GA10830@lst.de> On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 08:13:25AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 12:47:39PM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote: > > The following patch accidentally removed the code for delivering > > completions for cancelled reads and writes to user space: "[PATCH 04/33] > > aio: remove retry-based AIO" > > (https://lore.kernel.org/all/1363883754-27966-5-git-send-email-koverstreet@google.com/) > > Umm, that was more than 10 years ago. What code do you have that > is this old, and only noticed that it needs the completions now? > > I'd much prefer your older patch to simply always fail the cancelations. Hm, if no one noticed for that long then I agree that we should probably try and get rid of this.