From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C20517E788 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 13:27:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708694847; cv=none; b=S8SiLAFFt58ShaNhK48J9rcXqcHrEj5u67BHfXTLf/WdAsWDdbW2fxyyb61GmR6lBuiMguB3IIcjDb64oRT1eswBtKIAbCbRtO4zweM6109J0IV2qdBw8G5SAGvf6d9OJoF/gr7tJvKHqKAF98rHHjpon/k/oaGZLy60QgddHnc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708694847; c=relaxed/simple; bh=oGqMY1QzHsfZ2rW04EC1oAsZEi4EEsHzezK3272dm/U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=LQXJObUfbVEcXICrNC7uT8xEh4yePkVh0oha7rDaYnfMlA7mWqakeXsPZ04wrWhGTeFrZdVp6kIjUYisgCU3Bf8faiOnrlzTgQoK9tF+buE8nOndjZS7gf2tQNt0GJKLzK9yquqKkrLG8dTevIhoIM6K/myIZpS5r1K2DrzSCGE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=tqEF6FKZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="tqEF6FKZ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8DCAC433F1; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 13:27:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1708694847; bh=oGqMY1QzHsfZ2rW04EC1oAsZEi4EEsHzezK3272dm/U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=tqEF6FKZzU26Vb3jjyEVaS/CQlqgDSrEmImSGeHyWN7X4PpoGxdcFj6uC9M42DQ82 dbw8EEDqOG86ybHVGLV3NbIXG+rDJ+ps0docyAr7DhXXikaq1pyeYD5eJy3APnEgQ6 GicQy2O+gMN2sftWuRASJbqgoNzlmVBDlCNygQdCRQsc5Sw418Mxdi1V3OGMTkNvi9 j4a9PpRTHHzwS2aMqlQyxCSjATzlH8ugJaBNfEljZUeKMgJYcLbzsO+MqffNLPlINU +DdZe1vGvsupvkoutQ20J4kCuTZkOpQmyTiBi1RcPWF1KYNf48E/iw2yPkt0nimbO2 CuBH7Q1NnCUUg== Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 14:27:23 +0100 From: Christian Brauner To: Heiko Carstens Cc: Nathan Chancellor , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Alexander Viro , Seth Forshee , Tycho Andersen Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pidfd: add pidfdfs Message-ID: <20240223-ansammeln-raven-df0ae086ff4a@brauner> References: <20240213-vfs-pidfd_fs-v1-0-f863f58cfce1@kernel.org> <20240213-vfs-pidfd_fs-v1-2-f863f58cfce1@kernel.org> <20240222190334.GA412503@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> <20240223-delfin-achtlos-e03fd4276a34@brauner> <20240223125706.23760-A-hca@linux.ibm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240223125706.23760-A-hca@linux.ibm.com> > So you are basically saying that for now it is ok to break everybody's > system who tries linux-next and let them bisect, just to figure out they > have to disable a config option? Let me fix that suggestive phrasing for you. You seem to struggle a bit: > I think we should flip the default because this is breaking people who > are trying linux-next and making them bisect which can be annoying. Yes, that was the intent. I probably should've made that clear. What I was trying to do is to flip the default to N and fix the policy. When that is done we should aim to flip back to y.