From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 896634644E; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 15:13:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711120394; cv=none; b=CHvFy7hlx7QJgJArJVvScXpWQELZdf0hYqVJsm2iYhR09bQsMCGpcsPyKjjrOjxkfd56+0Eb4yPxNu9ciCvCFaKv+R3k538650yUpRaAjDfb/25EkCpkGP4nGH5VY+ldnbasaGf5BuQ63RXJ7nmutY7vZ9xAMuQToio5Rmg845M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711120394; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Dw4ByjZkVEzsc9Sp+TM4v9hJZ71PCSuq7eO3NUfsKAw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=awOZx7uyrTfoR1bSv8CpTtouug+uc4n6llZ9VKHFYIxqAy63rpEr50kZb5ZL0KIBORTHYlyg145J4+jdc+B08slWFuFvdQ5HYmp+pDgtJ5ykUID6UETDKhdbNgt4fngWVDuVtkQk8e1wZq181be+SuNrVnqTKp3LI3DzMUf43iA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=I2jc6i1b; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="I2jc6i1b" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 87098C433C7; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 15:13:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1711120394; bh=Dw4ByjZkVEzsc9Sp+TM4v9hJZ71PCSuq7eO3NUfsKAw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=I2jc6i1bQ/VajU1sWOLiT0eFC2kaIA4tkdniovHcHkCqFBL5vMWNDVpw93VXj9mNh 52uhqqog+uOD5WMT/FEQ/8oGDu1dImC7Tx/EM1gWbE33a9oEdPfC+p2Wwf1wwG+fzl cJ9LB75vZiTF9uL7m8zMob9vSzaPWeu/4ntQzF7NBnch0DSkRumV+W/9+sAc1FHb68 rWaXn3/4rDQVguPMIcQySdmxw3QW5TmX/TMbfjUPc1gNlJ/hSjcxnI70yrXsftknM6 LQVcLvLlkJ75xKHwdyCXQvOzNDvDbUAdHQE7IqbAS5YcPyP0P/lw8LfYyXDBLGDrmC 4zyzl0fwZa6Mw== Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 08:13:12 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: "Eric Van Hensbergen" Cc: asmadeus@codewreck.org, "Lizhi Xu" , syzbot+7a3d75905ea1a830dbe5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux_oss@crudebyte.com, lucho@ionkov.net, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, v9fs@lists.linux.dev, regressions@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH next] fs/9p: fix uaf in in v9fs_stat2inode_dotl Message-ID: <20240322081312.2a8a4908@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <00000000000055ecb906105ed669@google.com> <20240202121531.2550018-1-lizhi.xu@windriver.com> <20240321182824.6f303e38@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 14:26:07 +0000 Eric Van Hensbergen wrote: > Patch is in the unapplied portion of my for-next tree along with > another one. I was hoping to hear some feedback on the other one > before i did a pull request and was torn on whether or not I wait on > -rc1 to send since we are so close. My guess would be that quite a few folks use 9p for in-VM kernel testing. Real question is how many actually update their work tree before -rc1 or even -rc2, given the anticipated merge window code instability.. so maybe there's no extreme urgency? =46rom netdev's perspective, FWIW, it'd be great if the fix reached Linux before Thursday, which is when we will forward our tree again.