From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A811E3D76; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 03:43:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712115811; cv=none; b=XsQNAfHeCInc/u3BIb13vFz2Nt85AUpqPHNdD+Uh8kWNHgHtFbEKtxdYSTGzaEYOETU9eEXLrYFhrJrBahEe637nLQlLOop8St9efyivQtoIhWxannpK+becknDEpWDph76Ssy7e28uFh6BVm791yHxvRkm50o0mOAJiuS8spto= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712115811; c=relaxed/simple; bh=s7/TSFoZCTujo5clr5oMUi2k1rXwU6wxmLVEFWWgRkU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=EC0h8Pks3C9v0ESh/DebaedOJVTLYf90CsMQsAm5tHnV0+n2DJwXuesY6riFS0x7K7+KM70r6ZghxHfmtUl/5Ycx0kKHwvCriiAzdgnG4DyEKfrEe25pSpGOMcG8NxZsUhCfDg2QRSoZc5V+qqY0c738pBUtkX2KE/HV+4hjTHU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=jD8RoC2u; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="jD8RoC2u" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 18160C433C7; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 03:43:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1712115810; bh=s7/TSFoZCTujo5clr5oMUi2k1rXwU6wxmLVEFWWgRkU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=jD8RoC2uZ8BxQS36zgcM+wnGfDSCz+IKoBlYePPxOpmJryZaes5zDeCrR8XuwJo/B 25sX34qXV3vezh48cN8ekUsylZNy64OPcySwmhAkpgHO5UKfBygdNACIisiWY1OS5+ +9Bx/+pbzINpirerZ0r+gT9v43p1QKpvyTNuvZb1dV5xS0ycAGbqhjSZ01XsvmuUuN WvmDmekhQwtePz21O+1I6WGLUAJM55WxvdNOFjAXDf9hSNnmUpt0ZiZlqxFE0XFtcZ Y8UH1+q2ZHxaSXArEUOPgZF16XUqJc/PQnH50BcDWcj7v8DxQl9JvWAz58mrIACq1j tXJ9UEz9f+VaA== Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 20:43:28 -0700 From: Eric Biggers To: Eugen Hristev Cc: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, jaegeuk@kernel.org, chao@kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@collabora.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, krisman@suse.de, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 4/9] ext4: Reuse generic_ci_match for ci comparisons Message-ID: <20240403034328.GF2576@sol.localdomain> References: <20240402154842.508032-1-eugen.hristev@collabora.com> <20240402154842.508032-5-eugen.hristev@collabora.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240402154842.508032-5-eugen.hristev@collabora.com> On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 06:48:37PM +0300, Eugen Hristev wrote: > + ret = generic_ci_match(parent, fname->usr_fname, > + &fname->cf_name, de->name, > + de->name_len); > + if (ret < 0) { > + /* > + * Treat comparison errors as not a match. The > + * only case where it happens is on a disk > + * corruption or ENOMEM. > + */ > + return false; > } > - return !ext4_ci_compare(parent, fname->usr_fname, de->name, > - de->name_len, false); > + return ret; Maybe write this as simply 'return ret > 0;'? - Eric