From: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
To: "Björn Töpel" <bjorn@kernel.org>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>
Subject: Re: riscv32 EXT4 splat, 6.8 regression?
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 18:19:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240416181944.23af44ee@namcao> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87v84h2tee.fsf@all.your.base.are.belong.to.us>
On 2024-04-16 Björn Töpel wrote:
> Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> writes:
>
> > Fixed version:
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> > index fa34cf55037b..af4192bc51d0 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> > @@ -245,6 +245,7 @@ static void __init setup_bootmem(void)
> > * be done as soon as the kernel mapping base address is determined.
> > */
> > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT)) {
> > + memblock_reserve(__pa(-PAGE_SIZE), PAGE_SIZE);
> > max_mapped_addr = __pa(~(ulong)0);
> > if (max_mapped_addr == (phys_ram_end - 1))
> > memblock_set_current_limit(max_mapped_addr - 4096);
>
> Nice!
>
> Can't we get rid of the if-statement, and max_mapped_address as well?
I don't see why not :D
Best regards,
Nam
diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
index fa34cf55037b..f600cfee0aef 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
@@ -197,7 +197,6 @@ early_param("mem", early_mem);
static void __init setup_bootmem(void)
{
phys_addr_t vmlinux_end = __pa_symbol(&_end);
- phys_addr_t max_mapped_addr;
phys_addr_t phys_ram_end, vmlinux_start;
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL))
@@ -238,17 +237,9 @@ static void __init setup_bootmem(void)
/*
* memblock allocator is not aware of the fact that last 4K bytes of
* the addressable memory can not be mapped because of IS_ERR_VALUE
- * macro. Make sure that last 4k bytes are not usable by memblock
- * if end of dram is equal to maximum addressable memory. For 64-bit
- * kernel, this problem can't happen here as the end of the virtual
- * address space is occupied by the kernel mapping then this check must
- * be done as soon as the kernel mapping base address is determined.
+ * macro. Make sure that last 4k bytes are not usable by memblock.
*/
- if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT)) {
- max_mapped_addr = __pa(~(ulong)0);
- if (max_mapped_addr == (phys_ram_end - 1))
- memblock_set_current_limit(max_mapped_addr - 4096);
- }
+ memblock_reserve(__pa(-PAGE_SIZE), PAGE_SIZE);
min_low_pfn = PFN_UP(phys_ram_base);
max_low_pfn = max_pfn = PFN_DOWN(phys_ram_end);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-16 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-12 14:57 riscv32 EXT4 splat, 6.8 regression? Björn Töpel
2024-04-12 15:43 ` Theodore Ts'o
2024-04-12 16:59 ` Björn Töpel
2024-04-13 4:35 ` Theodore Ts'o
2024-04-13 10:01 ` Conor Dooley
2024-04-13 14:43 ` Nam Cao
2024-04-14 0:24 ` Theodore Ts'o
2024-04-14 1:46 ` Andreas Dilger
2024-04-14 2:04 ` Theodore Ts'o
2024-04-14 2:18 ` Al Viro
2024-04-14 2:15 ` Al Viro
2024-04-14 4:16 ` Andreas Dilger
2024-04-14 14:08 ` Björn Töpel
2024-04-15 13:04 ` Christian Brauner
2024-04-15 16:04 ` Björn Töpel
2024-04-16 6:44 ` Nam Cao
2024-04-16 8:25 ` Christian Brauner
2024-04-16 11:02 ` Björn Töpel
2024-04-16 14:24 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-16 15:17 ` Nam Cao
2024-04-16 15:30 ` Nam Cao
2024-04-16 15:56 ` Björn Töpel
2024-04-16 16:19 ` Nam Cao [this message]
2024-04-16 16:31 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-16 17:00 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-04-16 18:34 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-16 22:36 ` Nam Cao
2024-04-17 15:31 ` Theodore Ts'o
2024-04-17 18:06 ` Nam Cao
2024-04-17 19:34 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-17 22:09 ` Andreas Dilger
2024-04-18 9:17 ` Nam Cao
2024-04-16 18:05 ` Björn Töpel
2024-04-16 18:09 ` Nam Cao
2024-04-16 16:19 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-16 16:31 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-04-16 18:18 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240416181944.23af44ee@namcao \
--to=namcao@linutronix.de \
--cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=anders.roxell@linaro.org \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).