From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, laoar.shao@gmail.com,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, longman@redhat.com,
walters@verbum.org, wangkai86@huawei.com, willy@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: move dentry shrinking outside the inode lock in 'rmdir()'
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 17:33:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240513163332.GK2118490@ZenIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wgZU=TFEeiLoBjki1DJZEBWUb00oqJdddTCJxsMZrJUfQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 08:58:33AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> We *could* strive for a hybrid approach, where we handle the common
> case ("not a ton of child dentries") differently, and just get rid of
> them synchronously, and handle the "millions of children" case by
> unhashing the directory and dealing with shrinking the children async.
try_to_shrink_children()? Doable, and not even that hard to do, but
as for shrinking async... We can easily move it out of inode_lock
on parent, but doing that really async would either need to be
tied into e.g. remount r/o logics or we'd get userland regressions.
I mean, "I have an opened unlinked file, can't remount r/o" is one
thing, but "I've done rm -rf ~luser, can't remount r/o for a while"
when all luser's processes had been killed and nothing is holding
any of that opened... ouch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-13 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-11 2:27 [RFC PATCH] fs: dcache: Delete the associated dentry when deleting a file Yafang Shao
2024-05-11 2:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-11 3:35 ` Yafang Shao
2024-05-11 4:54 ` Waiman Long
2024-05-11 15:58 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-05-11 16:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-11 16:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-11 18:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-11 18:26 ` [PATCH] vfs: move dentry shrinking outside the inode lock in 'rmdir()' Linus Torvalds
2024-05-11 18:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-11 19:28 ` Al Viro
2024-05-11 19:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-11 20:31 ` Al Viro
2024-05-11 21:17 ` Al Viro
2024-05-12 15:45 ` James Bottomley
2024-05-12 16:16 ` Al Viro
2024-05-12 19:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-12 20:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-13 5:31 ` Al Viro
2024-05-13 15:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-13 16:33 ` Al Viro [this message]
2024-05-13 16:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-23 7:18 ` Dave Chinner
2024-05-11 20:02 ` [PATCH v2] " Linus Torvalds
2024-05-12 3:06 ` Yafang Shao
2024-05-12 3:30 ` Al Viro
2024-05-12 3:36 ` Yafang Shao
2024-05-11 19:24 ` [PATCH] " Al Viro
2024-05-15 2:18 ` [RFC PATCH] fs: dcache: Delete the associated dentry when deleting a file Yafang Shao
2024-05-15 2:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-15 9:17 ` [PATCH] vfs: " Yafang Shao
2024-05-15 16:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-16 13:44 ` Oliver Sang
2024-05-22 8:51 ` Oliver Sang
2024-05-23 2:21 ` Yafang Shao
2024-05-22 8:11 ` kernel test robot
2024-05-22 16:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-22 17:13 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-05-22 18:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-11 3:36 ` [RFC PATCH] fs: dcache: " Al Viro
2024-05-11 3:51 ` Yafang Shao
2024-05-11 5:18 ` Al Viro
2024-05-11 5:32 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240513163332.GK2118490@ZenIV \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=walters@verbum.org \
--cc=wangkai86@huawei.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox