linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: libaokun@huaweicloud.com
To: netfs@lists.linux.dev, dhowells@redhat.com, jlayton@kernel.org
Cc: hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com, jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com,
	zhujia.zj@bytedance.com, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	libaokun@huaweicloud.com, yangerkun@huawei.com,
	houtao1@huawei.com, yukuai3@huawei.com, wozizhi@huawei.com,
	Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] cachefiles: flush ondemand_object_worker during clean object
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 20:51:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240515125136.3714580-4-libaokun@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240515125136.3714580-1-libaokun@huaweicloud.com>

From: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>

When queuing ondemand_object_worker() to re-open the object,
cachefiles_object is not pinned. The cachefiles_object may be freed when
the pending read request is completed intentionally and the related
erofs is umounted. If ondemand_object_worker() runs after the object is
freed, it will incur use-after-free problem as shown below.

process A  processs B  process C  process D

cachefiles_ondemand_send_req()
// send a read req X
// wait for its completion

           // close ondemand fd
           cachefiles_ondemand_fd_release()
           // set object as CLOSE

                       cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read()
                       // set object as REOPENING
                       queue_work(fscache_wq, &info->ondemand_work)

                                // close /dev/cachefiles
                                cachefiles_daemon_release
                                cachefiles_flush_reqs
                                complete(&req->done)

// read req X is completed
// umount the erofs fs
cachefiles_put_object()
// object will be freed
cachefiles_ondemand_deinit_obj_info()
kmem_cache_free(object)
                       // both info and object are freed
                       ondemand_object_worker()

When dropping an object, it is no longer necessary to reopen the object,
so use cancel_work_sync() to cancel or wait for ondemand_object_worker()
to complete.

Fixes: 0a7e54c1959c ("cachefiles: resend an open request if the read request's object is closed")
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@bytedance.com>
---
 fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c b/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c
index d24bff43499b..f6440b3e7368 100644
--- a/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c
+++ b/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c
@@ -589,6 +589,9 @@ void cachefiles_ondemand_clean_object(struct cachefiles_object *object)
 		}
 	}
 	xa_unlock(&cache->reqs);
+
+	/* Wait for ondemand_object_worker() to finish to avoid UAF. */
+	cancel_work_sync(&object->ondemand->ondemand_work);
 }
 
 int cachefiles_ondemand_init_obj_info(struct cachefiles_object *object,
-- 
2.39.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-15 13:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-15 12:51 [PATCH v2 0/5] cachefiles: some bugfixes for clean object/send req/poll libaokun
2024-05-15 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] cachefiles: stop sending new request when dropping object libaokun
2024-05-15 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] cachefiles: flush all requests for the object that is being dropped libaokun
2024-06-27 11:01   ` Jeff Layton
2024-06-27 11:20     ` Baokun Li
2024-06-27 15:18       ` Christian Brauner
2024-06-28  1:09         ` Baokun Li
2024-05-15 12:51 ` libaokun [this message]
2024-05-15 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] cachefiles: cyclic allocation of msg_id to avoid reuse libaokun
2024-05-19 11:11   ` Jeff Layton
2024-05-20  4:06     ` Baokun Li
2024-05-20 10:04       ` Jeff Layton
2024-05-20 12:42         ` Baokun Li
2024-05-20 12:54           ` Gao Xiang
2024-05-20 13:24             ` Baokun Li
2024-05-20 14:56               ` Gao Xiang
2024-05-21  2:36                 ` Baokun Li
2024-05-21  2:53                   ` Gao Xiang
2024-05-20 13:24           ` Jeff Layton
2024-05-15 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] cachefiles: add missing lock protection when polling libaokun
2024-06-26  3:04 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] cachefiles: some bugfixes for clean object/send req/poll Baokun Li
2024-06-26  3:28   ` Gao Xiang
2024-06-27  1:49     ` Baokun Li
2024-06-27  2:08       ` Gao Xiang
2024-06-27  2:18         ` Baokun Li
2024-06-27 11:03 ` Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240515125136.3714580-4-libaokun@huaweicloud.com \
    --to=libaokun@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=libaokun1@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=wozizhi@huawei.com \
    --cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhujia.zj@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).