From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45A9D1E49D; Mon, 20 May 2024 15:17:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716218255; cv=none; b=pw8u+axqL1z8n/x55FcavwuN5Y7YNtjCPp4V5DNK6XaUEV6bjAI213C5+4khwUTTl1SoQb3GNCHT7k/BkkaVpZG804gBVqWxRKqaoNq/zus0TnG/y9+oL8eedI7Kamnd+oEVqT6FzXWUb9BaKmDulsvYhS2ezhgX5HVQSlOAZC8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716218255; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Fk3TdpMwWcq77n1yGGGEGm8bSTFyy93wDKKzCOOfQP0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ZoZQfEyp8j1IjBvlk0+JhzSs2xd87lt15SII0EvYctXjqGh6zfx1ENE8Cof6rdYMiuLn/jPANGtFJRe2cW6eZABsZ17JFt+dVsjXDoN+/ZaJwOFci4SW4z+valVapS/afrsulNUfjAW3otRBl9UE08rsXdr6FprOcLRxy9YI+I8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=QVCTz/TH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="QVCTz/TH" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1716218254; x=1747754254; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Fk3TdpMwWcq77n1yGGGEGm8bSTFyy93wDKKzCOOfQP0=; b=QVCTz/THGhdokdkri6Mp4tLTPCiC3fpstT4B2cMHJSDfQDjK6W22uW20 rsriwbwL2VBxdhPXld3yter1sIY2rEBZPbI5Y8XkrnDi5fWAWcIuwDYF/ F7Jn12kevu+y9NArVF2M57IT7CX4xcmnHmnmvH4tEglEuYU38IGaZO9/E mJhzE3wJA4wo8Uj7stCoLkfcx92wiEGLZC7rm9O3O4YsLUezM50LUGfp2 lBx0Ec8nnwpG5M9jmReDMNLmEzfUeVv21Eriit5u8s5x2nITtr2GJHmEs T0/DO78bPNi1js80ZrVEL3uafr+jZSGNC3xyKr0TT9nY/7YLcC2JYytsH A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: EArVxg4RS5a90X9d4ac5Ww== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Pq4/yApeT66LDxyrBBV/yg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11078"; a="29863067" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,175,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="29863067" Received: from orviesa001.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.141]) by orvoesa102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 May 2024 08:17:33 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ay76jzxJRpSklShU4H633w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 0zYvbH3sTda2dVjmleOTIA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,175,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="69996880" Received: from unknown (HELO 108735ec233b) ([10.239.97.151]) by orviesa001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 May 2024 08:17:29 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 108735ec233b with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1s94lT-0004vQ-1l; Mon, 20 May 2024 15:17:27 +0000 Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 23:17:03 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Kees Cook , Eric Biederman Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Kees Cook , Justin Stitt , Alexander Viro , Christian Brauner , Jan Kara , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] exec: Add KUnit test for bprm_stack_limits() Message-ID: <202405202231.3Q9gWCar-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240520021615.741800-1-keescook@chromium.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240520021615.741800-1-keescook@chromium.org> Hi Kees, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on kees/for-next/execve] [also build test ERROR on kees/for-next/pstore kees/for-next/kspp brauner-vfs/vfs.all linus/master vfs-idmapping/for-next v6.9 next-20240520] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Kees-Cook/exec-Avoid-pathological-argc-envc-and-bprm-p-values/20240520-101851 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git for-next/execve patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240520021615.741800-1-keescook%40chromium.org patch subject: [PATCH 1/2] exec: Add KUnit test for bprm_stack_limits() config: nios2-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240520/202405202231.3Q9gWCar-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: nios2-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240520/202405202231.3Q9gWCar-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202405202231.3Q9gWCar-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): nios2-linux-ld: fs/exec.o: in function `exec_test_bprm_stack_limits': exec.c:(.text+0x1904): undefined reference to `kunit_binary_assert_format' >> nios2-linux-ld: exec.c:(.text+0x192c): undefined reference to `kunit_binary_assert_format' >> nios2-linux-ld: exec.c:(.text+0x19e8): undefined reference to `__kunit_do_failed_assertion' >> exec.c:(.text+0x19e8): relocation truncated to fit: R_NIOS2_CALL26 against `__kunit_do_failed_assertion' nios2-linux-ld: exec.c:(.text+0x1a28): undefined reference to `__kunit_do_failed_assertion' exec.c:(.text+0x1a28): relocation truncated to fit: R_NIOS2_CALL26 against `__kunit_do_failed_assertion' -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki