linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org,
	hch@infradead.org, brauner@kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com,
	chandanbabu@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, willy@infradead.org,
	yi.zhang@huawei.com, yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com,
	chengzhihao1@huawei.com, yukuai3@huawei.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 6/8] xfs: correct the truncate blocksize of realtime inode
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 17:52:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240529095206.2568162-7-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240529095206.2568162-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>

From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>

When unaligned truncating down a realtime file which sb_rextsize is
bigger than one block, xfs_truncate_page() only zeros out the tail EOF
block, this could expose stale data since commit '943bc0882ceb ("iomap:
don't increase i_size if it's not a write operation")'.

If we truncate file that contains a large enough written extent:

     |<    rxext    >|<    rtext    >|
  ...WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
        ^ (new EOF)      ^ old EOF

Since we only zeros out the tail of the EOF block, and
xfs_itruncate_extents() unmap the whole ailgned extents, it becomes
this state:

     |<    rxext    >|
  ...WWWzWWWWWWWWWWWWW
        ^ new EOF

Then if we do an extending write like this, the blocks in the previous
tail extent becomes stale:

     |<    rxext    >|
  ...WWWzSSSSSSSSSSSSS..........WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
        ^ old EOF               ^ append start  ^ new EOF

Fix this by zeroing out the tail allocation uint and also make sure
xfs_itruncate_extents() unmap rtextsize aligned extents.

Fixes: 943bc0882ceb ("iomap: don't increase i_size if it's not a write operation")
Reported-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanbabu@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/0b92a215-9d9b-3788-4504-a520778953c2@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 3 +++
 fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c  | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
index 58fb7a5062e1..db35167acef6 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
 #include "xfs_trans_priv.h"
 #include "xfs_log.h"
 #include "xfs_bmap_btree.h"
+#include "xfs_rtbitmap.h"
 #include "xfs_reflink.h"
 #include "xfs_ag.h"
 #include "xfs_log_priv.h"
@@ -1512,6 +1513,8 @@ xfs_itruncate_extents_flags(
 	 * the page cache can't scale that far.
 	 */
 	first_unmap_block = XFS_B_TO_FSB(mp, (xfs_ufsize_t)new_size);
+	if (xfs_inode_has_bigrtalloc(ip))
+		first_unmap_block = xfs_rtb_roundup_rtx(mp, first_unmap_block);
 	if (!xfs_verify_fileoff(mp, first_unmap_block)) {
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(first_unmap_block > XFS_MAX_FILEOFF);
 		return 0;
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
index d24927075022..ec7b7bdf8825 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
@@ -865,7 +865,7 @@ xfs_setattr_size(
 	 */
 	write_back = newsize > ip->i_disk_size && oldsize != ip->i_disk_size;
 	if (newsize < oldsize) {
-		unsigned int blocksize = i_blocksize(inode);
+		unsigned int blocksize = xfs_inode_alloc_unitsize(ip);
 
 		/*
 		 * Zeroing out the partial EOF block and the rest of the extra
-- 
2.39.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-29  1:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-29  9:51 [RFC PATCH v4 0/8] iomap/xfs: fix stale data exposure when truncating realtime inodes Zhang Yi
2024-05-29  9:51 ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/8] iomap: zeroing needs to be pagecache aware Zhang Yi
2024-05-31 13:11   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-31 14:03     ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-05-31 14:05       ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-31 15:44         ` Brian Foster
2024-05-31 15:43       ` Brian Foster
2024-06-02 22:22     ` Dave Chinner
2024-06-02 11:04   ` Brian Foster
2024-06-03  9:07     ` Zhang Yi
2024-06-03 14:37       ` Brian Foster
2024-06-04 23:38         ` Dave Chinner
2024-05-29  9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v4 2/8] math64: add rem_u64() to just return the remainder Zhang Yi
2024-05-31 12:35   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-31 14:04   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-05-29  9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v4 3/8] iomap: pass blocksize to iomap_truncate_page() Zhang Yi
2024-05-31 12:39   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-02 11:16     ` Brian Foster
2024-06-03 13:23     ` Zhang Yi
2024-05-29  9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v4 4/8] fsdax: pass blocksize to dax_truncate_page() Zhang Yi
2024-05-29  9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v4 5/8] xfs: refactor the truncating order Zhang Yi
2024-05-31 13:31   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-31 15:27     ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-05-31 16:17       ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-03 13:51       ` Zhang Yi
2024-05-31 15:44   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-03 14:15     ` Zhang Yi
2024-06-02 22:46   ` Dave Chinner
2024-06-03 14:18     ` Zhang Yi
2024-05-29  9:52 ` Zhang Yi [this message]
2024-05-31 13:36   ` [RFC PATCH v4 6/8] xfs: correct the truncate blocksize of realtime inode Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-03 14:35     ` Zhang Yi
2024-05-29  9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v4 7/8] xfs: reserve blocks for truncating " Zhang Yi
2024-05-31 12:42   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-31 14:10     ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-05-31 14:13       ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-31 15:29         ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-05-31 16:17           ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-29  9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v4 8/8] xfs: improve truncate on a realtime inode with huge extsize Zhang Yi
2024-05-31 13:46   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-31 14:12     ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-05-31 14:15       ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-31 15:00         ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-04  7:09           ` Zhang Yi
2024-05-31 12:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 0/8] iomap/xfs: fix stale data exposure when truncating realtime inodes Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-01  7:38   ` Zhang Yi
2024-06-01  7:40     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240529095206.2568162-7-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
    --to=yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=chandanbabu@kernel.org \
    --cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).